Parenting styles and psychological effects on children with alopecia areata: exploring family dynamics, anxiety, and depression.

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease that develops due to inflammation and causes sudden hair loss. Ithas been observed that family circumstances may contribute to the development of AA. This study aims to assessthe relationship between the development of alopecia areata in children, family functions, and depression andanxiety levels in their parents.Thirty-nine participants diagnosed with AA and 41 healthy controls (HC), agedbetween 8 and 18 years, and their parents participated in the study. The assessment of the children included thecompletion of a socio-demographic data form, the Parenting Style Scale (PSS), and the Revised Children's Anxietyand Depression Scale (RCADS). The parents provided information on a sociodemographic form, the BeckDepression Inventory (BDI), and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The children in the control group scoredsignificantly higher on the PSS acceptance/ involvement subscale than those with AA. In the AA group, the numberof authoritative and indulgent (PSS) families was statistically significantly lower than that of the families in the HC,and the number of neglectful families was statistically significantly higher than those of the control group. Totalanxiety and depression t scores (RCADS) were statistically significantly higher in the AA children than in theHC. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering familial factors and parental mental health tounderstand and address alopecia areata in children. Our findings support the psychosomatic component of AA.Implementing comprehensive treatment strategies that target psychological well-being and family dynamics couldprove crucial.

Psychosocial outcomes six months after epilepsy surgery: A perspective on coping strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy negatively affects the social functioning of patients. Epilepsy surgery is a treatment with superior rates of seizure freedom. The psychosocial outcomes after epilepsy surgery depend on several factors, including the patient's coping style. It is important to identify the patients who are at risk of experiencing psychosocial difficulties after epilepsy surgery and consult them for psychiatric interventions. This study aimed to assess changes in social adaptation, felt stigma, self-esteem, and self-efficacy after epilepsy surgery, and the effect of coping strategies, sociodemographic and epilepsy-related variables, and post-surgical seizure outcomes on these results. METHODS: Thirty adult patients with temporal lobe epilepsy who were candidates for surgery were included in the study (mean age: 33.07, mean seizure onset age: 17.2, mean duration of epilepsy: 15.8). The patients were assessed before and 6 months after epilepsy surgery using the Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale, Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Felt Stigma Scale, and Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory. RESULTS: The patients' self-efficacy levels were increased after surgery (p = 0.005). Postsurgical social adaptation levels were associated with higher positive reinterpretation and growth, active coping, and planning (p = 0.016, p = 0.005, p = 0.002, respectively). Postsurgical self-efficacy levels were positively associated with active coping and planning (p = 0.003, p = 0.035, respectively). Postsurgical self-esteem (p = 0.012, p = 0.049, p = 0.034, respectively) and stigma (p = 0.029, p = 0.014, p = 0.027, respectively) were negatively associated with positive reinterpretation and growth, active coping, and planning. Furthermore, being employed presurgical period was associated with better postsurgical social adaptation (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The psychosocial outcomes after epilepsy surgery depend not only on seizure outcomes. Understanding the factors beyond seizure freedom, allows healthcare professionals to have a pivotal role in exploring and managing patients' expectations, fostering a more comprehensive and realistic dialogue about potential outcomes. Considering employed patients had better psychosocial outcomes, we suggest patients' families, healthcare professionals, and epilepsy support organizations should work collaboratively to support people with epilepsy in terms of providing job opportunities.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on emergency psychiatry department admissions.

This study aimed to explore the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and lockdown period measures on patients' visits to the psychiatric emergency department (PED) of a University Hospital in Istanbul. We compared the number and characteristics of patients during the initial lockdown with visits in the pre- and post-lockdown months. We also investigated the number of monthly PED visits and hospitalizations between March 11, 2020 and 2021 and compared it to the same period in 2019 and between March 2021 and 2022. PED visits in the initial lockdown period in our university increased by 109% compared to the prelockdown months in the previous year. Anxiety and depressive disorders were responsible for most of this increase. The decline in PED visits was 3.1% and 42% during the first and second year of the pandemic, respectively; however, among the major diagnostic categories, we found that the rates of anxiety, depressive disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder increased significantly in the first year, while psychotic disorders declined and bipolar disorders remained the same. In the second year, there was a trend toward prepandemic year ratios. These findings show that the pandemic affects PED admissions in different ways at different periods. These data may also help shaping the public policies necessary to meet the evolving needs in the field of mental health of society at different public crises in the future.

Factors Affecting Topical Treatment Success in Pediatric Scabies Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Scabies is a common disease that affects the pediatric population. Treatment failure and relapse occur frequently in children. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify the factors that affect topical treatment success in pediatric scabies patients. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2022 to December 2022. Pediatric scabies cases were classified as belonging to either the treatment failure (TF) group or the treatment success (TS) group. RESULTS: We enrolled 170 patients for the study. In the TF group, the presence of symptomatic household members and referrals from physicians other than dermatologists were more common (both P < 0.001), and relapse rates and total symptom duration were higher (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, respectively). Regarding treatment agents, 5% permethrin was more commonly used in the TF group (71.1% versus 25%; P < 0.001). The proportion of patients treated with sulfur preparations was significantly higher in the TS group (60.7% versus 16.9%; P < 0.001). Misapplication of topical therapy was significantly more common in the TF group (P < 0.001), with statistically significant errors being (i) lack of treatment of close contacts (p<0,001), (ii) single application (P < 0.001), and (iii) local application (P = 0.027). A multivariate analysis revealed that TS was mainly associated with (i) the presence of atopy (odds ratio [OR] 6.12, 95% CI: 1.39-27.04), (ii) the absence of symptomatic household members (OR 6.31, 95% CI: 2.14-18.63), and (iii) presentation to a dermatologist rather than another specialist (OR 6.51, 95% CI: 2.11-20.13). The use of permethrin negatively affected treatment success (OR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric scabies patients should be treated before other family members become infested and with topicals other than permethrin. In addition, awareness of scabies needs to be increased among non-dermatologists.

Posterior transversus abdominis plane block versus lateral quadratus lumborum block in children undergoing open orchiopexy: a randomized clinical trial☆.

BACKGROUND: Due to the complex innervation of the testicle and spermatic cord, analgesic management can be challenging in orchiopexy. We aimed to compare the effects of posterior Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) and lateral Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) on analgesic use, pain, and parent satisfaction in unilateral orchiopexy. METHODS: ASA I-III, aged 6 months -to 12 years children undergoing unilateral orchiopexy were included to this double-blinded randomized trial. Patients were randomized into two groups with the closed envelope method before the surgery. Lateral QLB or posterior TAP block was applied under ultrasonography with 0.4 ml.kg-1 0.25% bupivacaine for both groups. The primary outcome was the assessment of additional analgesic usage in the peri-postoperative period. Evaluation of postoperative pain until 24 hours after surgery and parental satisfaction were also assessed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included in the analysis (45 patients in each group). The number of patients needing remifentanil was significantly higher in the TAP group (p < 0.001). The average FLACC (TAP: 2.74 ± 1.8, QLB: 0.7 ± 0.84) and Wong-Baker scores (TAP: 3.13 ± 2.42, QLB: 0.53 ± 1.12) were significantly higher for TAP (p < 0.001). Additional analgesic consumption at the 10th, 20th minutes, 6th, 16th, and 24th hours, especially after the 6th hour, were significantly higher for TAP. Parent satisfaction was significantly higher in the QLB group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Lateral QLB provided more effective analgesia than posterior TAP block in children undergoing elective open unilateral orchiopexy. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT03969316.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Healthcare Personnel: A University Hospital Experience.

Healthcare workers are among risk groups in the COVID-19. Even if they are not infected with the disease, they witness the effects of the pandemic. The aim of the study is to determine the factors affecting COVID-19 vaccination status and reasons for vaccine hesitancy of healthcare personnel in our hospital. Firstly, the vaccination status and demographic characteristics of all healthcare personnel was evaluated. After that, a survey was applied to 408 vaccinated and 297 nonvaccinated personnel. Within the first month after the beginning of vaccination, 66% of 3937 healthcare personnel received a COVID-19 vaccine. The number of vaccinated personnel was higher among doctors, master graduates or higher educational levels and basic science-laboratory unit workers. In the surveyed group, being under the age of 50 (OR:1.85), being nondoctor healthcare personnel (nurse/midwife OR:1.78, administrative personnel OR:3.42, patient attendant/cleaning staff OR:4.11, security guard/other OR:2.96), having had the disease before (OR:2.36), not having the flu vaccine (OR:3.24) and hesitancy about other vaccines (OR:6.61) were found to be independent risk factors for not having a COVID-19 vaccine or having it late. The three most common reasons for not getting vaccinated were doubt on the efficacy of the vaccine, distrust of its content, and fear of side effects. Taking steps by considering the main factors of hesitancy among healthcare personnel will increase the vaccine acceptance.