Effects of ureteral stent on urologic complications in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective study.

The aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of ureteral stents used in renal transplantation on urologic as well as other complications. Cases of renal transplants from living or deceased donors performed in our hospital were retrospectively evaluated. The effects of the routine use of ureteral stents on postoperative complications were investigated. All outcomes and complications encountered during the postoperative follow-up were recorded. The Lich-Gregoire technique, which is a method of extravesical ureteroneocystostomy, was performed on all patients. One hundred and twenty-two patients underwent renal transplantation between 2001 and 2007 in our hospital. Stents were placed routinely in all patients. Leakage was observed in one patient, and one patient developed an obstruction; however, none of the patients developed an infection. A lymphocele developed in one patient. All urologic complications were treated without major morbidity. Graft loss did not occur. Complications following urinary anastomosis have a high rate of morbidity in renal transplantation. Ureteral stenting in renal transplant recipients prevents early urologic complications. The data generated in the current study were compared to the literature.

Surgical approach to cases with multiple renal arteries in renal transplantation.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of multiple renal artery (MRA) presence on the success and complication rate of renal allotransplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 187 cases (128 men and 59 women) who were transplanted in our department from 1997 to 2005. 28 of these cases had MRA. Of MRA kidneys, 6 were obtained from cadavers and 22 from live donors. When the types of anastomoses for MRA cases were examined, 4 cases were anastomosed after being connected to the main polar artery with ex vivo bench surgery; the others had in vivo anastomosis. The patients were divided into two groups as single (group 1) and MRA (group 2) groups. Following the transplantation, creatinine levels, ATN ratios, development of hypertension, patient and graft survivals and vascular and urological complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival rates were compared between the two groups in the first and third post-operative years. In the first year, graft survival rates for groups 1 and 2 were 94.9 and 92.9% respectively, whereas in the third year these were calculated as 88 and 85.7%. Concerning patient survival, first year results for groups 1 and 2 were 92.5 and 89.2%, for the third year these were found to be 84.9 and 82.1%. Mean creatinine levels of both groups were compared in the first and third years. The results for groups 1 and 2 were 1.41 +/- 0.37 and 1.46 +/- 0.46 mg/dl respectively for the first year. In the third year these were found to be 1.60 +/- 0.43 and 1.69 +/- 0.49 mg/dl and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Vascular and urological complications were observed in only 6 out of 187 cases (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference has been observed between single and MRA kidneys considering the success and complication rates of renal allotransplantation.