How Dialysis Patients Cope with a Curfew? A Comparison of Psychological Status between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: There are many differences between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatments, including their impact on the psychological status of the patients. In this study, our aim was to compare the psychological statuses of HD and PD patients during the social isolation period due to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted this cross-sectional study on adult HD and PD patients when the curfew measures were in effect. We used an electronic form composed of 3 sections to collect data. In the first section, we collected data on the demographics and clinical and laboratory parameters of the patients. The second and third sections consisted of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) questionnaires, respectively. RESULTS: The HD (n = 116) and PD (n = 130) groups were similar regarding age and sex, and they had similar HADS anxiety scores. HADS depression scores were higher in PD patients (p = 0.052). IES-R scores were significantly higher in PD patients in comparison to HD patients (p = 0.001). Frequencies of abnormal HADS-anxiety (p = 0.035) and severe psychological impact (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in PD patients. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: During the social isolation period due to the COVID-19 pandemic, HD patients had better mood profiles than PD patients. A more stable daily routine, an uninterrupted face-to-face contact with health-care workers, and social support among patients in the in-center dialysis environment might be the cause of the favorable mood status. PD patients might need additional psychological support during those periods.

How the I1307K adenomatous polyposis coli gene variant contributes in the assessment of risk of colorectal cancer, but not stomach cancer, in a Turkish population.

Germline and somatic truncating mutations of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC) are thought to initiate colorectal tumor formation in familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome and sporadic colorectal carcinogenesis, respectively. Recently, an isoleucine-lysine polymorphism at codon 1307 (I1307K) of the APC gene has been identified in 6-7% of the Ashkenazi Jewish population. To assess the risk of this common APC allelic variant in colorectal carcinogenesis, a cohort of unselected Turkish subjects with stomach or colorectal cancer (or both) was analyzed for the APC I1307K polymorphism. Genomic DNA was extracted from patients by obtaining all stomach and colon malign polipose tissues using nuclei lysis methods. Detection of the I1307K mutation was performed using the commercial Pronto APC kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. The APC I1307K allele was identified in 7 of 57 stomach carcinoma patients (12.3%; P > 0.05) and 30 of 56 colon carcinoma patients (53.6%; P < 0.05) using antigen-anticor interaction methods. Comparing the frequencies of the two separate population control groups, the APC I1307K allele is associated with an estimated relative risk of 1.9 for colorectal neoplasia. Furthermore, APC I1307K carriers had greater numbers of adenomas and colorectal cancers per patient than noncarriers. The conclusion is that the APC I1307K variant leads to increased adenoma formation and colorectal cancer. The estimated relative risk for carriers may justify specific clinical screening for Turkish people expected to harbor this allele, and genetic testing in the long term may significantly promote colorectal cancer prevention in this population.