ABSTRACT
AIM: The analysis of experience of nelarabine use in refractory/relapsed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) depending on the immunophenotype and the line of therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the patients with relapsed or refractory T-ALL aged from 0 to 18 years who received treatment with nelarabine as a part of the therapeutic element R6 were included in the study. For all patients a detailed immunological analysis of leukemia cells with discrimination of immunological variants TI, TII, TIII or TIV was performed. Patients administered with nelarabine as a first therapeutic element were referred to the first-line therapy group, other patients were referred to the second-line therapy group. Nelarabine was ad- ministered as intravenous infusion at a dose of 650 mg/m2, on days 1-5. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (allo-HSCT) was considered for all patients. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2017, 54 patients with refractory/relapsed T-ALL were treated with nelarabine. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was 28% for all patients, cumulative risk of relapse (CIR) was 27%. EFS was significantly higher in nelarabine first-line therapy group in comparison with second-line therapy group (34±8% vs 8±8%, p=0,05). In patients after allo-HSCT EFS, OS and CIR were 51±10%, 50±10% and 39,1±9,5% accordingly. The best results were achieved in patients with TI immunophenotype. No toxicity-related mortality as well as severe neurologic complications or discontinuation of therapy associated with use of nelarabine were reported. CONCLUSION: The use of nelarabine is an effective strategy for the treatment of relapsed and refractory T-ALL. The best treatment outcomes were obtained in patients with TI immunophenotype and in the first-line therapy group. Optimal dosage regimens can be established dur- ing controlled clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Arabinonucleosides/therapeutic use , Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Prodrugs/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Arabinonucleosides/adverse effects , Arabinonucleosides/pharmacokinetics , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/mortality , Prodrugs/adverse effects , Prodrugs/pharmacokinetics , Progression-Free Survival , RecurrenceSubject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Humans , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Methylprednisolone/adverse effects , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Russia , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Until 1990, the survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in Russia was below 10%. To establish a protocol feasible under conditions there, ALL-MB 91 was designed to avoid prolonged bone marrow aplasia, thereby reducing needs for extensive supportive care, blood transfusions, long-lasting hospitalization and costs. High-dose therapies were avoided, anthracycline use was limited and CNS radiation therapy only foreseen in high-risk patients (about 30%). This was randomized against a modified BFM protocol. From 1995 to 2002, 834 patients of age up to 18 years were registered in 10 centres and 713 received after central randomization the allocated risk-stratified treatment. After a median follow-up of 7 years, the event-free survival (EFS) was 67+/-3% on ALL-MB 91 (N=358) vs 68+/-3% on ALL-BFM 90m (N=355). The overall survival (OS) was 71+/-3% vs 74+/-2%, respectively. Anaemia, thrombocytopenia, agranulocytosis >10 days and hospitalization (median 35 vs 68 days) were lower on ALL-MB 91 (P<0.01, N=197). While EFS and OS were similar with both protocols, ALL-MB 91 significantly incurred fewer toxicity and resource requirements and, therefore, has been increasingly used across Russia.