The real world experience of pediatric primary hyperoxaluria patients in the PEDSnet clinical research network.

The rarity of primary hyperoxaluria (PH) challenges our understanding of the disease. The purpose of our study was to describe the course of clinical care in a United States cohort of PH pediatric patients, highlighting health service utilization. We performed a retrospective cohort study of PH patients < 18 years old in the PEDSnet clinical research network from 2009 to 2021. Outcomes queried included diagnostic imaging and testing related to known organ involvement of PH, surgical and medical interventions specific to PH-related renal disease, and select PH-related hospital service utilization. Outcomes were evaluated relative to cohort entrance date (CED), defined as date of first PH-related diagnostic code. Thirty-three patients were identified: 23 with PH type 1; 4 with PH type 2; 6 with PH type 3. Median age at CED was 5.0 years (IQR 1.4, 9.3 years) with the majority being non-Hispanic white (73%) males (70%). Median follow-up between CED and most recent encounter was 5.1 years (IQR 1.2, 6.8). Nephrology and Urology were the most common specialties involved in care, with low utilization of other sub-specialties (12%-36%). Most patients (82%) had diagnostic imaging used to evaluate kidney stones; 11 (33%) had studies of extra-renal involvement. Stone surgery was performed in 15 (46%) patients. Four patients (12%) required dialysis, begun in all prior to CED; four patients required renal or renal/liver transplant.    Conclusion: In this large cohort of U.S. PH children, patients required heavy health care utilization with room for improvement in involving multi-disciplinary specialists. What is Known: • Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is rare with significant implications on patient health. Typical involvement includes the kidneys; however, extra-renal manifestations occur. • Most large population studies describe clinical manifestations and involve registries. What is New: • We report the clinical journey, particularly related to diagnostic studies, interventions, multispecialty involvement, and hospital utilization, of a large cohort of PH pediatric patients in the PEDSnet clinical research network. • There are missed opportunities, particularly in that of specialty care, that could help in the diagnosis, treatment, and even prevention of known clinical manifestations.

Healthcare utilization, quality of life, and work productivity associated with primary hyperoxaluria: a cross-sectional web-based US survey.

Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a family of ultra-rare, autosomal recessive, metabolic disorders associated with frequent kidney stones, chronic kidney disease and kidney failure, and serious complications due to systemic oxalosis, resulting in significant morbidity. We investigated the burden of PH among affected patients and caregivers. This cross-sectional, web-based survey was used to quantify the burden of PH, in terms of healthcare resource utilization, health-related quality of life, and work productivity and activity impairment among adults (≥ 18 years) with PH and caregivers of children (≤ 17 years) with PH in the US. Among the 20 respondents, there were 7 adults with PH and 13 caregivers of children with PH. Adherence to hyperhydration was noted as the most, or one of the most, difficult aspects of PH by 56% of respondents. Most patients (95%) had experienced painful kidney stone events, one-third had visited the emergency room, and 29% were hospitalized for complications due to PH. Of the 24% of patients on dialysis, all found the procedure burdensome. Adult patients' quality of life was negatively affected across several domains. Most respondents (81%) reported that PH had a negative effect on their finances. Employed adult patients and caregivers, and children with PH, had moderate impairment in work productivity, school attendance, and activity. Anxiety about future PH-related sequelae was moderate to high. These findings highlight the need for improvements in PH medical management. A plain language summary is available in the supplementary information.

Diagnostic Code-Based Screening for Identifying Children with Primary Hyperoxaluria.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the utility of diagnostic codes to screen for patients with primary hyperoxaluria (PH) and evaluate their positive predictive value (PPV) in identifying children with this rare condition in PEDSnet, a clinical research network of pediatric health systems that shares electronic health records data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of children who received care at 7 PEDSnet institutions from January 2009 through January 2021. We developed and applied screening criteria using diagnostic codes that generated 3 categories of the hypothesized probability of PH. Tier 1 had specific diagnostic codes for PH; tier 2 had codes for hyperoxaluria, oxalate nephropathy, or oxalosis; and tier 3 had a combination of ≥2 codes for disorder of carbohydrate metabolism and ≥1 code for kidney stones. We reviewed the electronic health records of patients with possible PH to confirm PH diagnosis and evaluate the accuracy and timing of diagnostic codes. The PPV of the codes was compared across tiers, time, PH type, and site. RESULTS: We identified 341 patients in the screen; 33 had confirmed PH (9.7%). Tier 1 had the highest proportion of PH; however, the PPV was only 20%. The degree to which an institution accurately represented point of care diagnoses in the data extraction process was predictive of higher PPV. The PPV of diagnostic codes was highest for PH3 (100%) and lowest for PH1 (22.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic codes for PH have poor PPV. Findings suggest that one should be careful in research using large databases in which source validation is not possible.

Hospital readmissions following initiation of nebulized arformoterol tartrate or nebulized short-acting beta-agonists among inpatients treated for COPD.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represent a significant economic burden, accounting for over half of direct medical costs. Reducing 30-day readmissions could save health care resources while improving patient care. Recently, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act authorized reduced Medicare payments to hospitals with excess readmissions for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. Starting in October 2014, hospitals will also be penalized for excess COPD readmissions. This retrospective database study investigated whether use of arformoterol, a nebulized long-acting beta agonist, during an inpatient admission, had different 30-day all-cause readmission rates compared with treatment using nebulized short-acting beta agonists (SABAs, albuterol, or levalbuterol). METHODS: A US nationally representative hospital database was used to study adults aged ≥40 years, discharged between January, 2006 and March, 2010, and with a diagnosis of COPD. Patients receiving arformoterol on ≥80% of days following treatment initiation were compared with patients receiving a nebulized SABA during hospitalization. Arformoterol and nebulized SABA patients were matched (1:2) for age, sex, severity of inpatient admission, and primary/secondary COPD diagnosis. Logistic regression compared the odds of readmission while adjusting for age, sex, race, admission type, severity, primary/secondary diagnosis, other respiratory medication use, respiratory therapy use, oxygen use, hospital size, and teaching status. RESULTS: This retrospective study compared 812 arformoterol patients and 1,651 nebulized SABA patients who were discharged from their initial COPD hospital admission. An intensive care unit stay was more common among arformoterol patients (32.1% versus 18.4%, P<0.001), suggesting more severe symptoms during the initial admission. The observed readmission rate was significantly lower for arformoterol patients than for nebulized SABA patients (8.7% versus 11.9%, P=0.017), as were the adjusted odds of readmission (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.92). CONCLUSION: All-cause 30-day readmission rates were significantly lower for arformoterol patients than nebulized SABA patients, both before and after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.

Risk of all-cause hospitalization in COPD patients initiating long-acting or short-acting beta agonist therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective claims study investigated the rates of all-cause hospitalization among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients initiating treatment with short-acting beta agonists (SABA) or long-acting beta agonists (LABA). METHODS: Data from the 5% national sample of Medicare enrollees for 2006-2008 were used. Patients initiating COPD therapy were identified as those with no COPD therapy for ≥ 6-months prior to initiating SABA or LABA (administered via dry-powder inhalers, metered-dose inhalers, or nebulizer) treatment. All patients were continuously eligible for Medicare Parts A, B, and D for 18 months. Those enrolled in Medicare Advantage, who had asthma, or were < 65 years old were excluded. Differences in the rates of all-cause hospitalizations and time to all-cause hospitalization during the 6-month follow-up period were examined, while adjusting for demographics, clinical indicators, and health service use. RESULTS: Among 3017 COPD patients who met the inclusion criteria, 883 (30%) were LABA users and 2134 (70%) were SABA users. Overall, 21% of patients (16% [144/883] of LABA and 23% [492/2134] of SABA) had a hospitalization during the follow-up period. Mean time to hospitalization was 86 days for LABA vs 64 days for SABA patients (p < 0.05). The adjusted hazard ratio for hospitalization in a Cox proportional hazards model was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.62-0.90) for patients treated with LABA vs. SABA. LIMITATIONS: The analysis was adjusted for multiple background characteristics, but important measures of severity in COPD, such as measures of lung functioning, were not available and may have differed between patients treated with LABA or SABA. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis indicate COPD patients initiating LABA treatment had a longer time to all-cause hospitalization and a 26% lower risk of hospitalization during the 6-months follow-up period compared to those initiating SABA therapy.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of ciclesonide in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are recommended as first-line treatment for persistent asthma. This study was designed to evaluate the ability of ciclesonide (CIC) in subjects with stable asthma previously receiving another ICS or ICS/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) to maintain asthma disease control. In this 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, subjects aged > or =12 years with stable mild-to-moderate persistent asthma were switched at randomization from an ICS or ICS/LABA to CIC, 80 microg twice daily (CIC80 b.i.d.; n = 149); CIC, 160 microg once daily (CIC160 q.d.; n = 150); or placebo (n = 147). Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1); primary end point), morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), rescue albuterol use, total asthma symptom score, nighttime awakenings, and safety were evaluated. FEV(1) improved from baseline to week 12 after CIC80 b.i.d. treatment (+0.07 L; p = 0.0232), and was maintained after CIC160 q.d. (+0.01 L; p = 0.6217). FEV(1) declined from baseline after placebo (-0.12 L; p < 0.0001) and significantly versus CIC treatments (p < 0.001). At week 12, morning PEF maintained baseline values after CIC80 b.i.d. (-4.43 L/minute; p = 0.1272) and decreased after CIC160 q.d. (-5.77 L/minute; p = 0.0490) and placebo (-12.82 L/minute; p < 0.0001); the difference between CIC80 b.i.d. and placebo was significant (p = 0.035). Baseline albuterol use, total daily asthma score, and nighttime awakenings were maintained after CIC treatments (p > 0.25), but increased after placebo (p < or = 0.002); the difference between CIC80 b.i.d. and placebo was significant (p < 0.02). Incidence of adverse events was similar among treatment groups (range, 52.0-57.9%). In this study, CIC80 b.i.d. maintained asthma control in subjects with stable mild-to-moderate asthma previously treated with ICS or ICS/LABA, was well tolerated, and, in general, was better than CIC160 q.d. in maintaining disease control.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of ciclesonide in subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma not currently using inhaled corticosteroids.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are a first-line treatment for persistent asthma. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide (CIC) in subjects with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma not using an ICS. This was a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 16-week study in subjects who were > or =12 years old, had a > or =6-month history of persistent asthma, a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of > or =60 to < or =85% predicted, and who were not using an ICS < or =30 days before study entry. Subjects were randomized to CIC, 80 microg twice daily (CIC80 b.i.d.; n = 170); CIC, 160 microg once daily in the morning (CIC160 q.d. in the A.M.; n = 173); CIC80 b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by CIC160 q.d. for 12 weeks (CIC80 b.i.d./CIC160 q.d.; n = 171); or placebo (n = 177). Change in FEV(1) from baseline to the average of weeks 12 and 16 (primary end point) and to week 16, A.M. peak expiratory flow, rescue albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, asthma symptom scores, and safety were evaluated. FEV(1) improved from baseline to the average of weeks 12 and 16 for CIC80 b.i.d. (+0.30L; p < 0.0001), CIC160q.d. (+0.19L; p < 0.0001), CIC80 b.i.d./CIC160 q.d. (+0.19L; p < 0.0001), and placebo (+0.06L; p = 0.0251); improvement was greatest for CIC80 b.i.d. (p < 0.01). At week 16, all CIC treatments significantly improved FEV(1) and A.M. PEF from baseline (p < 0.0001) and compared with placebo (p < or = 0.015). All treatments reduced albuterol use and nighttime awakenings and improved asthma symptom scores (p < or = 0.05 versus baseline); these improvements were greater for CIC80 b.i.d. than for placebo (p < 0.01). The incidence of adverse events was similar among treatment groups (range, 53-58%). In this study, CIC80 b.i.d. improved disease control in subjects with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma not using an ICS and provided greater improvements than CIC160 q.d.

A new solution-based intranasal triamcinolone acetonide formulation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: how does the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile for cortisol suppression compare with an aqueous suspension-based formulation?

The present study was undertaken to describe the pharmacokinetics of a new solution-based intranasal triamcinolone acetonideformulation (Tri-Nasal) in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and to use a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) simulation approach to compare the potential effects on plasma cortisol with that of an aqueous suspension-based nasal triamcinolone acetonide formulation (Nasacort AQ). Data from an open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis receiving three doses (100, 200, and 400 microg) of a nasal solution-based triamcinolone acetonide formulation (Tri-Nasal) over 7 days were used to describe the pharmacokinetics of this formulation. Available literature data for a suspension-based aqueous triamcinolone acetonide formulation (Nasacort AQ) were used to describe its pharmacokinetic profile after similar single doses of 110, 220, and 440 microg. A PK/PD simulation approach was used to predict the anticipated cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) of these two formulations. These simulations suggested a cortisol suppression of 8% to 16% for the single and steady-state doses of the solution-based product. Similar CCS estimates were predicted for equivalent doses of the aqueous suspension-based triamcinolone acetonide formulation with no difference between both formulations. Post hoc power analysis suggested that the predicted cortisol suppression is not likely to be significant for either preparation, including the clinically recommended doses of 200 and 220 microg of the solution-based and suspension-based formulations, respectively. In summary, based on the results of this PK/PD simulation, the plasma levels observed afternasal administration of the solution or the aqueous suspension are unlikely to induce a clinically relevant cortisol suppression, especially for the recommended dosing regimens of 200 and 220 microg/day.