No Waning of Pneumococcal Vaccine Responses over Time in People with Inflammatory Arthritis: Findings from a Single Centre Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against pneumococcus reduces the risk of infective events, hospitalisation, and death in individual with inflammatory arthritis, particularly in those on immunomodulating therapy who are at risk of worse outcomes from pneumococcal disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the serological protection following vaccination against pneumococcal serovars over time. Methods: This was a single centre, retrospective cohort study of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondylarthritis who had previously received the PPSV23 polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax). Data were retrieved between January 2021 to August 2023. Dates of previous pneumococcal vaccination were identified using linked primary care records. Serum serotype levels were collected. The primary outcome was serological response defined as a titre ≥0.35 mcg/mL in at least five from a total of 12 evaluated pneumococcal serovars, examined using a Luminex platform. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, co-morbidities, and the use of prednisolone, conventional synthetic and biological DMARDs were used to determine the odds of a sustained serological response according to time categorised into ≤5 years, 5-10 years, and ≥10 years since vaccination. Results: Serological response was measured in 296 individuals with inflammatory arthritis, with rheumatoid arthritis the most common diagnosis (74% of patients). The median time between pneumococcal vaccine administration and serological assessment was 6 years (interquartile range 2.4 to 9.9). A positive serological response to at least 5 serovars was present in 195/296 (66%) of patients. Time since vaccination did not significantly associate with serological protection compared with those vaccinated <5 years, the adjusted ORs of vaccine response was 1.15 (95% CI 0.64 to 2.07) in those 5-10 years and 1.26 (95% CI: 0.64 to 2.48) in those vaccinated over 10 years ago. No individual variable from the multivariate model reached statistical significance as an independent predictor of vaccine response, although steroid use at the time of vaccine had a consistent detrimental impact on serological immunity. Conclusions: We demonstrated that antibody titres following vaccination against pneumococcal serovars do not appear to wane over time. It appears more critical to focus on maximising the initial vaccine response, which is known to be diminished in this patient population.

Intentional overdose with tinzaparin: management dilemmas.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is increasingly being prescribed for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Despite the fact that its therapeutic use is considered to be safe, it can be complicated by major hemorrhage and, in contrast to unfractionated heparin, it can only partially be neutralized by protamine. Recent reports of LMWH overdose illustrate the need for a consensus on its management. OBJECTIVES: To describe a case of self-poisoning with a very large dose of tinzaparin and discuss management options in patients with LMWH overdose. CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old woman was brought to the Emergency Department 2 h after injecting herself with 280,000 IU of tinzaparin subcutaneously in an attempt to commit suicide. Despite an unrecordable activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT > 180 s) and prolonged prothrombin time, there was no evidence of active bleeding. She was given an intravenous infusion of 100 mg protamine sulfate and was admitted to the intensive care unit, where further infusions of protamine were administered. Normalization of the APTT occurred 40-50 h post admission, reflecting normal tinzaparin clearance rather than neutralization by protamine. No hemorrhagic complications occurred during her hospitalization except for prolonged bleeding from venipuncture sites. CONCLUSION: In this case of massive tinzaparin overdose, conventional doses of protamine failed to rapidly normalize the deranged coagulation parameters. The favorable clinical outcome suggests that, regardless of the LMWH amount injected, no active treatment is needed in the absence of hemorrhage. This is in accordance with the limited published data concerning cases of overdose with other LMWHs.