Evaluation of the therapeutic and the chemical effects of balneological treatment on clinical and laboratory parameters in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic and the chemical effects of balneological treatment (peloidotherapy + hydrotherapy), and its effects on serum levels of interleukin-1beta (IL-1ß), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Sixty-four (64) knee OA patients were randomly divided into study and control groups. Balneological treatment, consisting of hydrotherapy, and peloidotherapy were given to both groups. Unlike the study group, in the control group, the peloid was applied over a stretch film cover, preventing any contact between the skin and peloid. Clinical outcome measures of the study were pain degree, patient's and investigator's global assessment on visual analog scale (VAS-pain, VAS-PGA, VAS-IGA), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (pain, stiffness, and physical function). Patients were evaluated at baseline, post-treatment (after 10th session), and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Blood samples were taken at baseline, post- treatment, and 6 months after treatment for analysis of IL-1ß, TNF-α, and IGF-1 serum levels. When compared with the baseline, VAS measurements decreased significantly in almost all evaluation periods in both groups, and no difference was observed between the groups. In the study group, WOMAC scores showed significant improvement in all assessments. In the control group, pain and physical function subscores of WOMAC significantly decreased at post-treatment and 3 months after treatment. In group comparison, pain and stiffness subscores showed a significant difference in favor of the study group at 6 months after treatment. No clinically significant improvement was seen in levels of IL-1ß and IGF-1 in both groups during the whole assessment period. Because of TNF-α kit failure, we could not evaluate the measurements. In conclusion, balneological treatment is an effective treatment option to improve the pain and functional capacity of patients with knee OA. The application of peloid by contact with the skin is superior in the long-term period, which means that in addition to the thermal effect, the chemical content of peloid can also contribute to the therapeutic effect.

Effects of balneological outpatient treatment on clinical parameters and serum cytokine levels in patients with chronic low back pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of balneological outpatient treatment (hydrotherapy and peloidotherapy) on clinical status and serum cytokine levels in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Seventy-four patients with CLBP who accepted to participate to the study were randomly divided into two groups. The study group was given ten sessions (in 2 weeks) of hydrotherapy, peloidotherapy, and home exercise, while the control group was given only home exercise. All patients were assessed before and at the end of therapy, at the 1st and 3rd months. The primary outcomes were pain intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS) (VAS-pain, VAS-rest, VAS-exercise) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcome measures included patient's and physician's global assessment (VAS-PGA), (VAS-DGA), finger-to-floor distance (FFD), modified Schober test, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and the use of analgesic drug. Venous blood samples were drawn from all patients before/1st day and after therapy/12th day to measure serum interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 levels. Significant improvement was observed in the study group in VAS-pain, VAS-rest, VAS-exercise, VAS-PGA, VAS-DGA, ODI, and SF-36 parameters after treatment and improvement maintained for 3 months. In the control group, significant improvement was observed in VAS-pain, VAS-exercise, VAS-PGA, VAS-DGA, and ODI scores on the 12th day and continued for 3 months. Decrease in pain, pain during rest and exercise, modified Schober test, VAS-PGA, VAS-DGA, ODI scores, and the increase in SF-36 pain and general health scores showed superiority in favor of the study group in all evaluations. There was a significant increase in IL-10 values from baseline at the end of treatment in the study group. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was significantly lower in the study group compared with the use of NSAID in the control group in the 3rd month. Balneological outpatient treatment improved clinical status in CLBP patients. Although no significant correlation was clearly determined between IL-10 levels and pain score, this effect might be related to the observed increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 levels that was observed only in the study group.

Spa therapy for generalized osteoarthritis: an open, observational, preliminary study.

OBJECTIVES: Open, prospective study to evaluate the effect of spa therapy on generalized osteoarthritis (GOA). METHODS: Patients diagnosed as GOA were recruited from a private outpatient clinic. The treatment protocol was designed with 6 different spa modalities, 3 for each consecutive day, during 18 days. Interventions were Berthollet's technique (local mineral water cloud application), peloidotherapy, hydrotherapy, under water /standard (dry) massage, supervised water exercise, bath in hydro-massage pool, bath in tub with hydro-jets, free immersion in mineral water pool. The primary outcome was a clinically relevant improvement in 50% of patients at the end of the treatment. Statistical analyses were based on intention-to-treat method. Health care providers were blinded to the study. RESULTS: Ninety nine patients were included between March 7th-April 29th 2011 and all were analyzed for the primary outcome. Clinically relevant improvement was observed in 61% of the patients at the end of the treatment, and 68% at the 8th month. Patient acceptable symptom state was achieved in 33% of the patients at the 3rd week and 75% at the 8th month and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International Criteria (OMERACT-OARSI criteria) response in 41% of the patients at the 3rd week and 19% at the 8th month. Improvement was also observed in other judgment criteria evaluating pain, function and quality of life and continued until the 8th month for some of the parameters. No serious adverse effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Spa treatment may improve the clinical status of patients with GOA and seems to be well tolerated.

Balneotherapy in fibromyalgia: a single blind randomized controlled clinical study.

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of balneotherapy in fibromyalgia management. Fifty women with fibromyalgia under pharmacological treatment were randomly assigned to either the balneotherapy (25) or the control (25) group. Four patients from the balneotherapy group and one patient from the control group left the study after randomization. The patients in the balneotherapy group (21) had 2 thermomineral water baths daily for 2 weeks in Tuzla Spa Center. The patients in the control group (24) continued to have their medical treatment and routine daily life. An investigator who was blinded to the study arms assessed the patients. All patients were assessed four times; at the beginning of the study, at the end of the 2nd week, the 1st month, and the 3rd month after balneotherapy. Outcome measures of the study were pain intensity, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), patient's global assessment, investigator's global assessment, SF-36 scores, and tender point count. Balneotherapy was found to be superior at the end of the cure period in terms of pain intensity, FIQ, Beck Depression Inventory, patient's global assessment, investigator's global assessment scores, and tender point count as compared to the control group. The superiority of balneotherapy lasted up to the end of the 3rd month, except for the Beck Depression Inventory score and the investigator's global assessment score. Significant improvements were observed in PF, GH, and MH subscales of SF-36 during the study period in the balneotherapy group; however, no such improvement was observed in the control group. Balneotherapy was superior only in VT subscale at the end of therapy and at the end of the third month after the therapy as compared to the controls. It was concluded that balneotherapy provides beneficial effects in patients with fibromyalgia.

Spa therapy and balneotherapy for treating low back pain: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is a major public health concern and complementary treatments are frequently used for this condition. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the evidence for or against the effectiveness of spa therapy and balneotherapy for treating low back pain. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted on Medline, Embase, Amed Cochrane Central, the UK National Research Register and ClincalTrials.gov (all until July 2005). Hand searches were performed and experts contacted. Methodological quality was assessed using a standard scale. RESULTS: Five randomized clinical trials met all inclusion criteria. Quantitative data synthesis was performed. The data for spa therapy, assessed on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), suggest significant beneficial effects compared with waiting list control groups (weighted mean difference 26.6 mm, 95% confidence interval 20.4-32.8, n=442) for patients with chronic low back pain. For balneotherapy the data, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, also suggest beneficial effects compared with control groups (weighted mean difference 18.8 mm, 95% confidence interval 10.3-27.3, n=138). CONCLUSIONS: Even though the data are scarce, there is encouraging evidence suggesting that spa therapy and balneotherapy may be effective for treating patients with low back pain. These data are not compelling but warrant rigorous large-scale trials.

SPA therapy in fibromyalgia: a randomised controlled clinic study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of spa therapy in the management of fibromyalgia. METHODS: Thirty women with fibromyalgia were randomly assigned to either a spa therapy group or a control group. The spa therapy group (n = 16) had spa treatment for 2 weeks in addition to their medical treatment. The control group (n = 14) continued to have their medical treatment and/or daily exercises. An investigator who was blinded for the intervention assessed all the patients for 9 months. Improvements in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), pain and number of tender points were primary outcomes. Secondary outcome measures were improvement in sleep disturbance, fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, Beck Depression Inventory and patient's global evaluation. RESULTS: the spa group was found to be superior to the control group at the end of intervention in terms of FIQ, pain, tender point count, fatigue and patients' global assessment. This superiority remained for 6 months in FIQ, 1 month in pain and tender point count. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the addition of spa therapy to medical therapy has both short- and long-term beneficial effects in female patients with fibromyalgia.

[Balneotherapy and spa therapy of rheumatic diseases in Turkey: a systematic review]. / Balneotherapie und Kurorttherapie rheumatischer Erkrankungen in der Türkei: Ein systematischer Review.

AIM: Turkey has a lot of thermal and mineral springs and is looking back on a still vivid tradition of spa therapy and balneotherapy, applied especially for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. This tradition is predominantly empiric and intuitive, however, it has assumed some important aspects of modern balneotherapeutic methods as well. This article is aimed at presenting the characteristics of traditional and modern balneological and spa therapy forms in Turkey. METHOD: The studies which have been conducted between 1990 and 2000 in different spas in Turkey on the efficacy and effectiveness of spa therapy and balneotherapy for rheumatic diseases have been searched and analyzed independent of their design. A descriptive evaluation of the studies was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 15 published studies have been found and analyzed. The investigations have been carried out in 8 different spa resorts in Turkey. In these studies the effectiveness and efficacy of different balneological and spa therapies on a variety of rheumatic diseases (from osteoarthritis to fibromyalgia and from rheumatoid arthritis to low back pain) could be shown. Nearly all studied balneotherapeutic modalities were applied as bathing cures. Only in one study peloid therapy was applied. Balneotherapeutic therapy was applied in a modern and traditional way, and both open and stationary spa therapy forms were used at the same time. CONCLUSIONS: The review has shown the effectiveness of the investigated spa therapy and balneotherapy forms. It could be concluded that nearly all forms of spa therapy and balneotherapy used for the treatment of rheumatic diseases in Turkey are effective. A definitive conclusion, however, is not possible because of the heterogeneity of the study designs, methodological flaws, and the publication bias. In future good quality randomized controlled trials are needed.