Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 25(7): 1078-82, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20381287

ABSTRACT

This is a prospective randomized study comparing cefuroxime to 2 antistaphylococal agents (fusidic acid and vancomycin), for prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an institute, where methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) prevalence exceeds 25% of orthopedic infections. There were 3 patient groups. Group A included the patients who received cefuroxime, group B those who received fusidic acid, and group C those who received vancomycin. Patients were evaluated for the presence of superficial and/or deep infection at the surgical site. Statistical analysis did not reveal any substantial difference between the 3 groups. We do not recommend the use of specific antistaphylococcal agents for prophylactic use in primary THA and TKA, even in institution where MRSA and MRSE exceed 25% of orthopedic infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Cefuroxime/therapeutic use , Fusidic Acid/therapeutic use , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hip Prosthesis/microbiology , Humans , Incidence , Knee Prosthesis/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolation & purification , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...