Effect of Body Composition on Graft Function and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Normotensive Renal Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effects of body composition on graft function and cardiovascular outcomes in normotensive renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data from 136 renal transplant recipients with stable allograft function after living related donor transplant. We enrolled 87 normotensive recipients. We analyzed left ventricular mass index, renal resistive index, and body composition of recipients. We divided recipients into 2 groups according to mean lean body mass, defined by bioimpedance analysis, with 38 in group 1 (lean body mass <47 kg) and 49 in group 2 (lean body mass ≥47 kg). RESULTS: Mean time posttransplant was 35.0 ± 23.3 months. Mean renal resistive index, left ventricular mass index, lean body mass, body mass index, and fat mass were 0.67 ± 0.1, 195.0 ± 118.5 g/m2, 47.3 ± 9.1 kg, 25.9 ± 5.0 kg, and 44.6±10.5 kg,respectively. Lean body mass was positively correlated to sex (r = 0.36, P = .03), body mass index (r = 0.04, P = .416),renalresistive index (r = 0.495, P = .01), and left ventricular mass index (r = 0.713, P = .02) but negatively correlated to serum albumin levels (r=-0.343, P=0.04). Lean body mass was significantly higher in males than in females (P = .03). Patients in group 2 had significantly higher left ventricular mass index (P = .01) and renal resistive index (P = .03). In multiple regression analysis, lean body mass (P = .01) and left ventricular mass index (P = .01) were predictors of renal resistive index. CONCLUSIONS: Lean body mass significantly influences left ventricular mass index and renal resistive index. Hence, body composition analysis could be an early predictor of graft function and cardiovascular outcomes in normotensive renal transplant recipients.

Do Lifestyle Changes of Renal Transplant Recipients During the Pandemic Reduce the Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019?

INTRODUCTION: There is no published study regarding the effects of preventive measures on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) frequency in renal transplantation recipients. The aim of this study is to reveal the preventive measures taken by renal transplant recipients during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether these measures influence the prevalence of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After detecting the first COVID-19 case in Turkey, we briefed all of our renal transplant recipients on preventive measures regarding COVID-19. Two months afterward, a questionnaire was prepared regarding the preventive measures practiced by renal transplant recipients, and patients were asked whether they had any COVID-19 symptoms or had received a COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 132 patients, 68 were surveyed through telephone calls. During this time, 95.5% of patients were in isolation at home except for when seeing to their essential needs. Two (2.9%) patients were hospitalized due to increases in creatinine level and urinary tract infection. All patients have worn masks when going out and stated that they washed their hands more frequently. There was a decrease in the frequency of hospital controls in 79.4% of patients. Although 2 (2.9%) patients had complaints of dysuria and fever, they did not apply to the hospital because they thought hospitals carried risk during the pandemic. One patient had a cough with fever and was admitted to the hospital with suspicion of COVID-19 but tested negative. DISCUSSION: It was determined that renal transplant recipients in our study population meticulously complied with preventive measures and increased the use of masks and hand hygiene practices. As a result, none were infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Circulating Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 is Associated with Cardiovascular Prognosis and Graft Function in Renal Transplant Recipients.

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 (FGF23) serum levels and cardiovascular disease and early graft failure in renal transplant recipients.  Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted on renal transplant recipients followed by our adult kidney transplant clinic. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mean FGF23 levels (mean FGF23 level=71.2 ± 34.6pg/mL). The patients included in the study were classified as Group 1 (FGF23 <71 pg/mL, n= 42) and Group 2 (FGF23 ≥ 71pg/mL, n= 46) and the data was analyzed as a statistical significance between the two groups. The presence of atherosclerosis was determined by a Doppler ultrasound for evaluate the carotid artery intima-media thickness (CA-IMT). Intrarenal Doppler spectra were obtained with same Doppler ultrasound to determine the renal resistivity index (RRI) for evaluate graft renal failure. Results A total of 88 kidney transplantation recipients were included in the study. In the multivariate analysis adjusted for age and gender, the eGFR (ß =-0.217, p=0.048), CA-IMT (ß =0.318, p=0.009) and RRI (ß =0.246, p=0.019) parameters were statistically significant, while the remaining parameters were not statistically significant. In the group analysis, Ca (9.6 ± 0.3 vs. 8.8 ± 0,2, p< 0.05), CA-IMT (0.9 ± 0.2, vs. 0.6 ± 0.3, p< 0.05) and RRI (0.69 ± 0.04 vs. 0.60 ± 0.01, p< 0.05) were significantly higher in the patients in group 2 than the patients in group 1.  Conclusion According to our results, FGF23 can be considered as a descriptive biomarker for cardiovascular prognosis and graft function for patients with kidney transplantation.

Does neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio demonstrate deterioration in renal function?

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major health issue worldwide, which leads to end-stage renal failure and cardiovascular events. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a surrogate marker of inflammation and has been widely studied in malignancies, hypertension, heart diseases, and vascular diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate if NLR represents renal reserve and function after partial or radical nephrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study consists of patients who had undergone radical/partial nephrectomy in our hospital and/or who admitted to urology and nephrology clinics as an outpatient. Patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 (n = 46): Healthy controls; Group 2 (n = 50): Patients who had undergone unilateral partial nephrectomy; Group 3 (n = 46): Patients who had gone unilateral nephrectomy; Group 4 (n = 82): Patients who had CKD. RESULTS: The mean NLR of each group was as follows: Group 1: 2.14 ± 0.73; Group 2: 3.52 ± 3.74; Group 3: 3.64 ± 3.52, and Group 4: 3.53 ± 2.30. NLR was lower in Group 1 compared to other groups but statistically significant difference was observed only between Group 1 (control) and Group 4 (CKD), 2.14 ± 0.73 versus 3.53 ± 2.30 (p = .005). In non-parametric correlation analysis NLR was found negatively correlated with GFR and positively correlated CKD stage (p = .028 for both correlations). CONCLUSIONS: The NLR may constitute a practical predictor of CKD besides Cr in patients who had undergone partial or radical nephrectomy.