Management of Biliary Complications in Liver Transplant Recipients with Duct-To-Duct Anastomosis: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate biliary complications in liver transplant recipients with choledochocholedocho stomy anastomosis, to identify the risk factors for the development of such complications, and to evaluate the success of endoscopic approaches in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Between January 2013 and May 2021, a total of 238 patients with liver diseases underwent liver transplantation: 174 recipients undergoing choledochocholedochostomy anastomosis were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Their median age was 54.0 years. The median posttransplant follow-up period was 29 months. Hepatitis B virus infection (33%) was the most common indication for liver transplantation. Most patients (87%) received living donor liver transplantation. The overall prevalence of posttransplant biliary complications was 31%. Anastomotic biliary strictures were the most common biliary complications (72%), followed by biliary leakage (13%). The median time between endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and liver transplantation was 4 months, with a mean of 3 ± 1.6 sessions. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography-guided drainage and balloon dilation with or without stent placement was the most common treatment modalities for recipients with biliary strictures. The overall success rate of endoscopic treatment modalities was 83.3%, with 65% of the recipients exhibiting complete biochemical and endoscopic responses. The response did not differ significantly between living donor liver transplantation and cadaveric donor liver transplant recipients (P > .05). Three recipients required revision surgery for biliary complication repair. Six patients died due to biliary sepsis. CONCLUSION: Biliary stricture and leakages were the most common biliary complications after liver transplantation. Endoscopic treatment was successful in most recipients.

High-dose dual therapy is effective as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although many regimens, including quadruple, sequential, and concomitant treatment, are used and recommended as first-line or rescue therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection, eradication rates are still below 90% in intention-to-treat analyses. Treatment protocols with substantially high eradication rates and low antibiotic resistance are needed. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of high-dose dual therapy as first-line treatment in a Turkish population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the initial H. pylori status because of dyspeptic symptoms. All patients received a 14-day, high-dose dual therapy comprising rabeprazole (20 mg t.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g t.i.d.) for H. pylori eradication. H. pylori stool antigen tests of eradication were administered to all participants at least 4 weeks after the completion of the treatment. RESULTS: The high-dose dual therapy demonstrated a 91.3% rate of successful eradication of H. pylori infection. Per-protocol success was 94.4% among female patients (n=51) and 89.6% among male patients (n=86); in terms of gender, the differences were not significant (p=0.310). No side effects were observed during the study in any patient. Six other patients did not take adequate doses of the treatment protocol. CONCLUSION: High-dose dual therapy with rabeprazole and amoxicillin was highly effective and well tolerated as a first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication.