ABSTRACT
This study assesses the mechanism of action of plant-based silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. We compared AgNPs synthesized through Salvia moorcroftiana and Origanum vulgare extracts and their conjugates with the antibiotic Ceftriaxone for their capacity to cause oxidative damage through reactive oxygen species (ROS). We quantified ROS in the cells of two bacterial strains after treating them with all AgNP types and observed that AgNPs were most effective in K. pneumoniae as they resulted in the highest ChS1 count (44,675), while in P. aeruginosa, Cfx-AgNPs induced the highest levels of ROS with ChS1 count of 56,865. DNA analysis showed that both plant-based AgNPs (O-AgNPs = 0.192 and S-AgNPs = 0.152) were most effective in K. pneumoniae and S-AgNPs (abs = 0.174) and O-Cfx-AgNPs (abs = 0.261) in P. aeruginosa. We observed a significant increase in the levels of conjugated dienes (86.4 µM) and malondialdehyde (172.25 nM) in the bacterial strains after treatment with AgNPs, compared to the control (71.65 µM and 18.064 nM, respectively, in K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa). These results indicate lipid peroxidation. AgNPs also increased the levels of protein thiols (0.672 nM) compared to the control (0.441 nM) in K. pneumoniae, except for Chem-AgNPs (0.21 nM). These results suggest that plant-based AgNPs are more effective in oxidizing bacterial DNA, protein, and lipids than Chem-AgNPs. Furthermore, protein oxidation varied between AgNPs alone and AgNPs-antibiotic conjugates. The highest levels of protein thiols were found in the samples treated with O-Cfx-AgNPs (0.672 nM and 0.525 nM in K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, respectively). The results demonstrated that AgNPs kill bacteria by altering bacterial macromolecules such as DNA, lipids, and proteins.
ABSTRACT
The current pandemic has caused chaos throughout the world. While there are few vaccines available now, there is the need for better treatment alternatives in line with preventive measures against COVID-19. Along with synthetic chemical compounds, phytochemicals cannot be overlooked as candidates for drugs against severe respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The important role of secondary metabolites or phytochemical compounds against coronaviruses has been confirmed by studies that reported the anti-coronavirus role of glycyrrhizin from the roots of Glycyrrhiza glabra. The study demonstrated that glycyrrhizin is a very promising phytochemical against SARS-CoV, which caused an outbreak in 2002-2003. Similarly, many phytochemical compounds (apigenin, betulonic acid, reserpine, emodin, etc.) were isolated from different plants such as Isatis indigotica, Lindera aggregate, and Artemisia annua and were employed against SARS-CoV. However, owing to the geographical and seasonal variation, the quality of standard medicinal compounds isolated from plants varies. Furthermore, many of the important medicinal plants are either threatened or on the verge of endangerment because of overharvesting for medicinal purposes. Therefore, plant biotechnology provides a better alternative in the form of in vitro culture technology, including plant cell cultures, adventitious roots cultures, and organ and tissue cultures. In vitro cultures can serve as factories of secondary metabolites/phytochemicals that can be produced in bulk and of uniform quality in the fight against COVID-19, once tested. Similarly, environmental and molecular manipulation of these in vitro cultures could provide engineered drug candidates for testing against COVID-19. The in vitro culture-based phytochemicals have an additional benefit of consistency in terms of yield as well as quality. Nonetheless, as the traditional plant-based compounds might prove toxic in some cases, engineered production of promising phytochemicals can bypass this barrier. Our article focuses on reviewing the potential of the different in vitro plant cultures to produce medicinally important secondary metabolites that could ultimately be helpful in the fight against COVID-19.
