Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Iran Med ; 11(1): 90-3, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18154427

ABSTRACT

The exact etiology of alopecia areata is still unknown, and no completely effective treatment has been established. The use of oral steroids for treating this disorder is controversial and may have potential side effects. Relapses are also common upon withdrawal of the medication. The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic and side effects of pulse-therapy with methylprednisolone combined with oral cyclosporine in severe alopecia areata, defined as alopecia totalis and universalis. Six patients with alopecia totalis and 12 patients with alopecia universalis were referred to our center. The patients were treated with monthly intravenous methylprednisolone in doses of 500 mg for three days and oral cyclosporine (2.5 mg/kg/day) for five to eight months. Responses were categorized as: "adequate" (i.e., hair regrowth on > or =70% of the affected area) and "inadequate" (i.e., hair regrowth on <70% of the affected area). Adequate response was observed in six (33%) patients: three with alopecia totalis and 3 with alopecia universalis. Responses were better in patients with alopecia totalis, age >20 years, negative history of atopy, negative family history of alopecia areata, presence of nail pitting, and pruritus in the affected area. No cases of relapses and no severe side effects were observed. Patients with severe and resistant alopecia areata, if properly selected, may benefit from intravenous methylprednisolone pulse-therapy plus oral cyclosporine.


Subject(s)
Alopecia/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Male , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Pulse Therapy, Drug , Treatment Outcome
2.
Arch Iran Med ; 10(1): 1-6, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17198445

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although corticosteroids have dramatically altered the prognosis of patients with pemphigus vulgaris, morbidity and mortality from systemic corticosteroid side-effects remains high. High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone has been used successfully in blistering diseases to avoid the complications of long-term orally-administered glucocorticoids. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and side-effects of oral and pulse steroid therapy in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-three patients with pemphigus vulgaris were categorized into two groups of study and control according to the disease severity and patient's preferred method of treatment. The study group included 36 males and 36 females. The control group included 26 males and 25 females. The mean +/- SD age of the two groups was 42.6 +/- 11.9 and 46.9 +/- 12.8 years, respectively. The mean +/- SD duration of the disease was 6.8 +/- 1.1 months in new cases (n = 45) and 25.9 +/- 26.0 months overally in the study group; it was 7.2 +/- 1.8 months in new cases (n = 30) and 28.4 +/- 24.6 months overally in the control group. During the induction phase, we performed pulse therapy with methylprednisolone in three consecutive monthly courses. Each course included 1000 mg intravenous methylprednisolone for 4 days plus 500 mg intravenous cyclophosphamide for 1 day. In this phase, the control group received 1 - 2 mg/kg/day oral prednisolone for 28 days plus 1.5 mg/kg/day azathioprine. All patients were followed for at least 12 months during which period, clinical response, relapse rate, and side-effects were evaluated. RESULTS: Pulse intravenous methylprednisolone with cyclophosphamide was generally safe and well-tolerated. Therapeutic responses of skin and mucosal lesions, rates of complete remission and relapse, and major organ-specific complications were similar in both groups. Significant statistical differences existed in total orally-administered prednisolone in one year, admission duration, and annual weight increments between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the side-effects of long-term oral steroids, hazards of obesity, and complications of long-term hospitalization, pulse methylprednisolone could be considered in patients who have problems with long-term admissions or with high-dose oral steroid usage, and also in obese patients.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Pemphigus/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Pemphigus/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...