Efficacy and Pain Tolerance of Alexandrite Laser Hair Removal at Different Stages of the Menstrual Cycle.

BACKGROUND: Several different parameters play a role in the transition of hair follicles to the anagen phase, with the role of androgens, progesterone, and estrogen hormones and receptors being significant. OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of laser hair removal (LHR) and pain tolerance during procedure were investigated during 3 different phases of the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Forty-eight axillae were randomly divided into 3 groups: menstruation, ovulation, and luteal. Three laser sessions were performed on each axilla at a 1-month interval. Blood hormone levels were measured in the patients. An alexandrite laser was applied during LHR sessions. Before each LHR session and 1 month after the third session, hair follicles in 4-cm2 areas in the center of the axillae were counted. Patients self-assessed the pain they felt during the laser application in each session with a visual pain scale. RESULTS: The average values for hair counting in the groups were as follows (M, menstruation; O, ovulation; L, luteinization): M0 = 47.6, M1 = 27.4, M2 = 16.1, M3 = 9.9; O0 = 41.8, O1 = 21.1, O2 = 13.8, O3 = 8.6; and L0 = 49.4, L1 = 27.1, L2 = 15.1, L3 = 9.8. The average values on the visual analog scale scores in the groups were: M1 = 3.94, M2 = 3.06, M3 = 1.94; O1 = 3.50, O2 = 3.06, O3 = 1.69; and L1 = 3.63, L2 = 2.50, L3 = 1.56. Statistical analysis was conducted with Tukey post hoc analysis after analysis of variance. CONCLUSIONS: The results of LHR are not affected by changes in hormone levels during the menstrual cycle in females. Although not statistically significant, it has been observed that pain tolerance during laser application is lower during the menstruation cycle.

Reply: Comparison of Two Anticoagulants for Pain Associated with Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections.

We read the letter titled "Comparison of Two Anticoagulants for Pain Associated with Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections" authored by Pensato et al. in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. The authors emphasized an important point. PRP treatments have a lot of variables; preparation method, application, amount of PRP injections, and content (such as number of platelet concentration, presence of leucocytes, and pH). However, in our study, we focused on the pain of injections. We showed that there is a pain difference by using different anticoagulants during PRP preparation, but we did not investigate for possible reason of this pain difference. The use of different anticoagulants may have caused changes in the content, and these alterations could be responsible for the variation in pain. Researches could be done to investigate the reason and the physiology of this effect.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The measurement of wound tensile strength and the effect of PRP on wound tensile force: an experimental investigation on rabbits.

Platelets in PRP are used for their functions in the initiation and regulation of the wound healing process and are used for the repair of injured tissues and the rejuvenation of healthy tissues. In this study, we evaluated the effect of a single dose platelet-rich plasma on skin wound healing and we demonstrated the effect of platelet-rich plasma on skin wound healing by measuring changes in the wound tensile strength.Material and methods: A total of 8 incisions, each 3 cm long, were made on the back skin on both sides of the vertebral column of 12 rabbits. After suturing their backs with staples, platelet rich plasma (PRP) was injected into the edges of the wounds on the left side and saline solution (saline) was injected into the edges of the wounds on the right side. The tensile force that causes wounds to rupture by applying tension was measured on the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days with the help of a special home-designed device.Results: The mean PRP enrichment was 3.19 fold over peripheral blood. The saline to PRP tensile strength ratios on the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days were calculated as 75.7%, 104.0%, 105.3% and 86.5%, respectively. Overall, the difference in the tensile strength for wounds that had received saline or PRP was in-significant.Conclusion: The application of PRP increases the tensile strength of the wound in the early period. It is possible to measure the tensile strength precisely in in vivo studies with economical home-designed devices.

Does the use of Dermojet affect the concentration of platelet-rich plasma? An in vitro experimental investigation.

Needle-free injection systems with high jet pressure have been used for seven decades for drug or vaccine administration via intradermal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular routes. These systems are used for the application of mesotherapy drugs in plastic surgery and dermatology. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) tissue regeneration is applied intradermally by a needle for different indications, such as wound healing and scar revision. To prevent complaints such as pain, erythema, and ecchymosis by patients during this application, PRP was applied using Dermojet, a jet injector system with a spring-loaded system. In this study, after measuring the average platelet count in PRP preparations obtained from 18 volunteers, a 2.5 cc PRP shot into an empty tube was performed with Dermojet. The mean platelet count was measured in a homogenized tube. The same procedures were performed for platelet-poor plasma (PPP). The platelet loss rates for PRP and PPP were compared. In addition, the amount of PRP in each shot of the Dermojet was calculated. When PRP and PPP were applied using the Dermojet, platelet loss was 8.41% and 8.33%, respectively. The difference in the number of platelets formed in PRP and PPP when applied with Dermojet was not statistically significant. PRP application with needle-free injection systems, such as Dermojet, may be an alternative because of patient comfort and the negligible platelet loss compared with the PRP application with the standard needle injection.

What Is the Adequate PRP Dose for an Effective Treatment? An In Vitro Experimental Study on the Skin.

BACKGROUND: The clinical results of many studies on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) differ due to a lack of standardization in PRP preparation and administration as well as many variables such as PRP preparation methods, platelet concentration, and platelet activation. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate a different variable that will affect PRP application results. How much PRP should be injected into the unit area of tissue for an effective PRP treatment? METHODS: The study was performed on fresh surplus tissues of 20 patients that were discarded in abdominoplasty and mammoplasty operations. Nine areas of 4 cm2 were marked on the skin. Fluorescein-stained PRP was injected intradermally with 3 different gauge needles at 3 different doses (0.01, 0.03, and 0.05 mL). After injections, spreads of the fluorescent dye-covered areas in horizontal and vertical planes were measured and compared. For the horizontal plane measurements, the dye spread was measured first from the surface of the skin and second from the dermal surface of the skin. In addition, the width and depth of the dye spread in the dermis were measured from vertical sections. RESULTS: Changing the needle diameter does not affect the width or depth (thickness) of the PRP spread in the dermis. Increasing the applied dose to 0.03 mL increases the spread to the width and depth (thickness). CONCLUSIONS: In research evaluating the effectiveness of PRP treatments, it is necessary to report the volume of PRP to be applied per unit of tissue.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Skin Graft Storage: An Experimental Study Using Rabbit Ears.

BACKGROUND: Storage of surplus grafts for later use is one of the standard procedures used in plastic surgery. For the delayed use of skin grafts, various methods and media have been investigated for short-term storage. This study aimed to investigate the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) skin graft storage on the survival of skin grafts obtained from rabbit ears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve rabbits were used in this study. A total of 12 skin grafts measuring 1 × 1 cm were obtained from the inner surfaces of the rabbits' ears. The grafts were stored at +4°C in saline, Hartmann's, and PRP media. On days 3, 7, 10, and 14, the grafts were implanted into the ears in areas measuring 1 × 1 cm where the skin, cartilage, and perichondria were excised. After the implantation of the grafts, the survival rates were evaluated by measuring the graft areas on day 0, day 10, and day 30. RESULTS: The graft survival rate decreased as the storage period increased in all 3 of the media. The decrease in survival rate was higher in the grafts that were stored in the Hartmann's media in comparison with the saline and PRP media, and the difference was statistically significant. The decrease in graft survival was similar between the storage in saline and PRP media; however, the differences were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Although in vitro criteria are important for evaluating graft survival, in vivo studies showing the graft take rate in the recipient area are required. When the in vivo criteria are evaluated, the use of PRP is not superior to the use of saline for graft storage. However, additional studies are required to evaluate the effects of PRP media on graft quality.

Skin graft storage in platelet rich plasma (PRP).

Storage of skin grafts for later use is one of the standard applications in surgery. It is the most preferred method to maintain at +4°C in refrigeration after wrapping the surplus grafts into sterile gauze pad moistened with saline. Although there are many studies on the storage of skin grafts, less is known about storing skin grafts with PRP. Twenty-five pieces of 1 × 1 cm2 partial thickness skin graft were harvested from 12 patients during the reduction mammoplasty operation. Twenty-four grafts were divided into 4 groups, and each group consisted of 6 grafts, 1 graft was analyzed as Day 0. Grafts in Group 1, 2, and 3 were wrapped by sterile gauze pad moistened by either saline (Group 1) or Hartman (Group 2) or PRP (Group 3). Grafts were analyzed macroscopically and microscopically. There were no significant differences between media for the first 10 days. Decrease in viability was less in saline and PRP wrapped grafts at 20 day, viability decreased significantly in all environments after 20 days. Although there was no significant difference in saline or PRP storage, it was observed macroscopically that the grafts stored in the PRP appeared better.

Effects of device variables to radiofrequency (RF) applications.

RF devices have frequency, power and duration setting options, it is important to make sure that the device meets the targeted values at the head output. This study was made to evaluate the RF device output value accuracy and the effects of different frequencies on the tissue heat levels. RF was applied to invitro tissues obtained from surgical operations, and invivo tissues during operations. Heat differences and depth were measured by laser/IR thermometer and thermal infrared camera. First, the output frequency and power values provided by the device were approved. Then, three three heads (monopolar, bipolar and tripolar) with three different frequencies (1,7, 20 MHz) were used. Depth of heat increase was evaluated in millimeters. The results showed that temperature increase varied between 10°C and 30°C at different depths using different frequencies. Heating of the skin with a radiofrequency device in a therapeutic dose is possible if the appropriate frequency and adequate power values are applied. Because the therapeutic temperature is close to the complication limit, the practitioner should be an expert using the device, well-knowledgeable about the regional skin structure and thickness, as well as be able to properly adjust the application doses in order to get therapeutic results.