Evaluation of an electronic prescription platform: Clinicians' feedback on three distinct services aiming to facilitate clinical decision and safer e-prescription.

BACKGROUND: Health Care Professionals (HCPs) are the main end-users of digital clinical tools such as electronic prescription systems. For this reason, it is of high importance to include HCPs throughout the design, development and evaluation of a newly introduced system to ensure its usefulness, as well as confirm that it tends to their needs and can be integrated in their everyday clinical practice. METHODS: In the context of the PrescIT project, an electronic prescription platform with three services was developed (i.e., Prescription Check, Prescription Suggestion, Therapeutic Prescription Monitoring). To allow an iterative process of discovery through user feedback, design and implementation, a two-phase evaluation was carried out, with the participation of HCPs from three hospitals in Northern Greece. The two-phase evaluation included presentations of the platform, followed by think-aloud sessions, individual platform testing and the collection of qualitative as well as quantitative feedback, through standard questionnaires (e.g., SUS, PSSUQ). RESULTS: Twenty one HCPs (8 in the first, 18 in the second phase, and five present in both) participated in the two-phase evaluation. HCPs comprised clinicians varying in their specialty and one pharmacist. Clinicians' feedback during the first evaluation phase already deemed usability as "excellent" (with SUS scores ranging from 75 to 95/100, showing a mean value of 86.6 and SD of 9.2) but also provided additional user requirements, which further shaped and improved the services. In the second evaluation phase, clinicians explored the system's usability, and identified the services' strengths and weaknesses. Clinicians perceived the platform as useful, as it provides information on potential adverse drug reactions, drug-to-drug interactions and suggests medications that are compatible with patients' comorbidities and current medication. CONCLUSIONS: The developed PrescIT platform aims to increase overall safety and effectiveness of healthcare services. Therefore, including clinicians in a two-phase evaluation confirmed that the introduced system is useful, tends to the users' needs, does not create fatigue and can be integrated in their everyday clinical practice to support clinical decision and e-prescribing.

The clinical outcome of the Metha short hip stem: a systematic scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Short femoral stems were designed to bridge the gap between conventional straight design stems and hip resurfacing prostheses in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A number of clinical trials have been recently conducted to assess the clinical and safety profile of the cementless, colarless, tapered Metha short hip stem in young or active middle-aged individuals. METHODS: A systematic scoping review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. 4 reviewers independently conducted the search using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms "short" AND "hip" AND "stem". RESULTS: From the initial 773 studies we finally chose 12 studies after applying our inclusion-exclusion criteria. The number of operated hips that were included in these studies was 5048 (mean BMI range: 22.7-35.2, mean age range: 44.4-60.4 years, mean follow-up range: 2-9 years). The mean modified Coleman methodology score was 52.3/100, while it ranged from 31/100 to 63/100. All mean clinical outcome scores that were used in the studies illustrated significant postoperative improvement when compared with the respective initial values. The revision rate of the Metha stem for component-related reasons was 2.5%, while the rate of major complications not requiring revision of the Metha stem was 2.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The Metha stem performs well in young or active middle-aged THA patients. Further studies are required for the assessment of the long-term results.