Ischemic changes in lead aVR is associated with left ventricular thrombus or high-grade spontaneous echocontrast in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between ischemic changes in the lead aVR and left ventricular thrombus (LVT) or high-grade spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Quantitative T wave polarity in lead aVR (TPaVR) and ST segment deviation in the lead aVR (STaVR) measured from a surface electrocardiogram (ECG), as well as the absolute numerical values, were recorded. The ST/TPaVR ratio was obtained by dividing the larger absolute value by the smaller. The presence of LVT or high-grade SEC was recorded using echocardiograpy. The SYNTAX score (SS), clinical SS (cSS), and residual SS (rSS) were calculated from angiography results. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients with LVT or high-grade SEC were included in Group 1. Group 2 comprised 170 patients who did not have any LVT or high-grade SEC. The P wave duration, V2 ST-segment elevation, TPaVR, cSS, and ST/TPaVR ratio were significantly higher in Group 1. The ejection fraction (EF) and STaVR were significantly higher in Group 2. The EF (Odds ratio [OR]: 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.833-0.973; p=0.008), TPaVR (OR: 1.454, 95% CI: 1.074-1.967; p=0.015), and ST/TPaVR ratio (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.307-1.959; p<0.001) were determined to be independent predictors for Group 1. CONCLUSION: Ischemic changes in the lead aVR are closely associated with LVT or high-grade SEC in anterior MI patients.

Association of P wave duration index with atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoballoon catheter ablation.

AIM: We aimed to investigate the relationship between the recurrence of AF and P wave duration index (PWDI) in patients with nonvalvular PAF. METHODS: We included 114 patients who underwent cryoballoon catheter ablation with the diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (55 male, 59 female; mean age 55.5±10,9years). PWDI was calculated by dividing the Pwd by the PR interval in DII lead of 12­lead ECG. Patients had regular follow-up visits with 12-lead ECG, medical history and clinical evaluation. 24h Holter ECG monitoring had been recorded at least 12months after ablation. RESULTS: AF recurrence was detected in 24 patients after 1year. Patients were divided into two groups according to the AF recurrence. All parameters were compared between the two groups. Age, DM, HT frequency, ACEI-ARB use, CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED score, HsCRP, LA diameter, LA volume, LA volume index, Pwd and PWDI were related to AF recurrence. In binary logistic regression analysis, PWDI (OR=1.143, p=0.001) and HT (OR=0.194, p=0.020) were found to be independent parameters for predicting AF recurrence. Every 0,01 unit increase in PWDI was found to be associated with 14.3% increase in the risk of AF recurrence. The cut-off value of PWDI obtained by ROC curve analysis was 59,9 for prediction of AF recurrence (sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 69.0%). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.760 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Increased PWDI may help to identify those patients in whom electrical remodeling has already occurred and who will get less benefit from cryoablation.

S-R difference in V1-V2 is a novel criterion for differentiating the left from right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias.

AIM: The correct estimation of the VA origin as RVOT or LVOT results in reduced ablation duration reduced radiation exposure and decreased number of vascular access. In our study, we aimed to detect the predictive value of S-R difference in V1-V2 for differentiating the left from right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias. METHODS: We included 123 patients with symptomatic frequent premature ventricular outflow tract contractions who underwent successful catheter ablation (70 male, 53 female; mean age 46.2 ± 13.9 years, 61 RVOT, 62 LVOT origins). S-R difference in V1-V2 was calculated with this formula on the 12-lead surface ECG: (V1S + V2S) - (V1R + V2R). Conventional ablation was performed in 101 (82.1%) patients, CARTO electroanatomic mapping system was used in 22 (17.9%) patients. RESULTS: V1-2 SRd was found to be significantly lower for LVOT origins than RVOT origins (p < .001). The cutoff value of V1-2 SRd obtained by ROC curve analysis was 1.625 mV for prediction of RVOT origin (sensitivity: 95.1%, specificity: 85.5%, positive predictive value: 86.5%, negative predictive value: 94.5%). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.929 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: S-R difference in V1-V2 is a novel and simple electrocardiographic criterion for accurately differentiating RVOT from LVOT sites of ventricular arrhythmia origins. The use of this simple ECG measurement could improve the accuracy of OTVA localization, could be beneficial for decreasing ablation duration and radiation exposure. Further studies with larger patient population are needed to verify the results of this study.