ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with pelvic floor disorders (PFD). Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most effective weight loss methods. Although SG has been found to improve urinary incontinence (UI) and overactive bladder (OAB), its impact on fecal incontinence (FI) remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized study involved 60 female patients with severe obesity who were randomly assigned to two groups: the SG group and the diet group. The SG group underwent SG, while the diet group received a low-calorie, low-lipid diet for 6 months. The patients' condition was assessed before and after the study using three questionnaires: the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS), the Overactive Bladder 8-Question Awareness Tool (OAB-V8), and the Wexner Score (CCIS). RESULTS: After 6 months, the SG group had a significantly higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) compared to the diet group (p<0.01). Both groups showed a decrease in the ICIQ-FLUTS, OAB-V8, and CCIS scores (p<0.05). UI, OAB, and FI improved significantly in the SG group (p<0.05), but no improvement was observed in the diet group (p>0.05). The correlation between %TWL and PFD was statistically significant but weak, with the strongest correlation between %TWL and ICIQ-FLUTS score and the weakest correlation between %TWL and CCIS score (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend bariatric surgery for the treatment of PFD. However, given the weak correlation between %TWL and PFD after SG, further research should explore factors other than %TWL that are effective in recovery, particularly in relation to FI.
Subject(s)
Fecal Incontinence , Obesity, Morbid , Pelvic Floor Disorders , Urinary Bladder, Overactive , Urinary Incontinence , Humans , Female , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Pelvic Floor Disorders/surgery , Pelvic Floor Disorders/complications , Prospective Studies , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/surgery , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/complications , Obesity/surgery , Urinary Incontinence/complications , Weight Loss , Gastrectomy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Fecal Incontinence/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A stress ball is a simple and effective distraction method during painful procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using a stress ball during endoscopy on patients' pain, anxiety, and satisfaction levels. The randomized controlled study included 60 patients who underwent endoscopy in a training and research hospital in Istanbul. Patients were randomly assigned to the stress ball group or the control group. Patients in the stress ball group ( n = 30) squeezed a stress ball during endoscopy, whereas the control group ( n = 30) received no intervention during endoscopy. Data were collected using a sociodemographic form, a postendoscopy questionnaire, the Visual Analog Scale to assess pain and satisfaction, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Pain scores did not differ significantly between the groups before ( p = .925) or during ( p = .149) the endoscopy procedure but were significantly lower in the stress ball group after the procedure ( p = .008). Similarly, preprocedure anxiety scores were comparable ( p = .743), whereas postprocedure anxiety scores were significantly lower in the stress ball group ( p < .001). The satisfaction score after endoscopy was higher in the stress ball group, but the difference was not statistically significant ( p = .166). This study suggests that use of a stress ball during endoscopy reduces patients' pain and anxiety levels.