[Reduction in the need for glucocorticoids on the background of therapy with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from real clinical practice].

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend reducing the use of glucocorticoids (GCs) due to the high risk of associated complications. AIM: To determine the frequency of GC cancellations and dose reductions in real clinical practice, while taking into account active RA therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 303 patients with RA reliable according to ACR/EULAR criteria (women 79.9%, age 52.8±13.3, disease duration 9 [4; 16] years, DAS-28-CRP 4.9±1.0, RF seropositivity 77.4%, ACPA seropositivity 70.3%), who were prescribed or changed therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or Janus kinase inhibitors (iJAK) due to disease exacerbation and ineffectiveness of previous treatment. All patients initially received GC (7.7±3.8 mg/day equivalent of prednisolone). After adjustment of therapy, 42.9% of patients received methotrexate, 27.6% leflunomide, 2.5% sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, or a combination with an Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 63.7% bDMARDs, and 7.2% iJAK. The need for GC intake was assessed by a telephone survey conducted 6 months after the start of follow-up. RESULTS: Telephone survey was possible in 274 (90.4%) persons. There was a significant decrease in pain intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS 0-10) from 6.3±1.4 to 4.3±2.4 (p<0.001), fatigue (NRS) from 6.7±2.3 to 5.2±2.1 (p<0.001), and functional impairment (NRS) from 5.4±2.1 to 3.9±2.0 (p<0.001). A positive PASS index (symptom status acceptable to patients) was noted in 139 (50.7%) patients. GC cancellation was noted in 19.7%, dose reduction in 25.9%, maintaining the same dose in 42.7%, and dose increase in 11.7%. CONCLUSION: Against the background of intensive RA therapy, including combination of DMARDs with bDMARDs or iJAK, complete withdrawal or reduction of GC dose was achieved in less than half (45.6%) of patients after 6 months.

Are the Goals of Therapy Achievable in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Upadacitinib in Real Clinical Practice?

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of UPA in RA patients in real clinical practice after 3 and 6 months of therapy. The study included 63 RA patients with high activity of the disease. Activity was assessed according to the DAS28(ESR), DAS28(CRP), SDAI, CDAI; functional ability to HAQ; quality of life to the EQ-5D; disease activity according to the patient's RAPID-3 index; the level of depression and anxiety to the HADS scale. The effectiveness of therapy was evaluated after 3 (n = 45) and 6 (n = 31) months of UPA therapy. Remission or low activity of the disease by 3 months of therapy was achieved by most patients: remission of 69.8% of patients, low activity of the disease-16.3% of patients. Moderate or high activity persisted in 13.9% of patients. By the 6th month of UPA therapy, the number of remissions reached 90%, low activity 3.3%, moderate activity persisted in 6.7% of patients, high activity of the disease was not in any patient. 20% improvement in function was achieved in 71.8% of patients by the 3rd month of therapy and in 77.8% by the 6th month of treatment; the difference in average HAQ values by the 3rd month of therapy was 0.38 points, by the 6th month-0.58 points. After 3 months of follow-up, 31.1% of patients continued taking GC, by 6 months-24.2%. The dose of GC was reduced from an average of 7.23 to 5.6 mg/s. The percentage of patients requiring NSAIDs decreased from 95.2 to 35.6% and 33.3%, respectively. DMARDs continued to be received by 75.6% of patients by 3 months and 69.7% by 6 months of follow-up. Achieving remission or low activity of the disease in patients with RA receiving UPA in real clinical practice is possible in most patients. A rapid decrease in inflammatory activity is accompanied by a significant improvement in the functional state and quality of life of patients. UPA therapy reduces the need for the use of NSAIDs and reduces the dose of GC in a third of patients.

[Endogenous estrogen deficiency and the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain: A review].

Sexual dimorphism of chronic diseases is a phenomenon determined by differences in the hormonal status of men and women. In this regard, estrogens, which have a complex effect on the body, are of great interest. In particular, estrogens play an important role in the natural control of pain and inflammation. A decrease in estrogen levels associated with menopause or iatrogenic effects (hysterectomy, use of aromotase inhibitors), as well as mutations of genes responsible for the synthesis of structural components of membrane estrogen receptors (ESR1 and ESR2), can significantly reduce the positive effects of these hormones. Deficiency of estrogen can become one of the reasons for the development of serious pathological changes in particular, the formation of chronic pain associated with the pathology of the musculoskeletal system.

[Epithelial protective therapy in comorbid diseases. Practical Guidelines for Physicians].

This document was produced with the support of the National Medical Association for the Study of Comorbidities (NASС). In 2021 the first multidisciplinary National Consensus on the pathophysiological and clinical aspects of Increased Epithelial Permeability Syndrome was published. The proposed guidelines are developed on the basis of this Consensus, by the same team of experts. Twenty-eight Practical Guidelines for Physicians statements were adopted by the Expert Council using the "delphic" method. Such main groups of epithelial protective drugs as proton pump inhibitors, bismuth drugs and probiotics are discussed in these Guidelines from the positions of evidence-based medicine. The clinical and pharmacological characteristics of such a universal epithelial protector as rebamipide, acting at the preepithelial, epithelial and subepithelial levels, throughout gastrointestinal tract, are presented in detail.

[Efficacy of combined use of glycosaminoglycan peptide complex for intramuscular administration and oral diacerein in osteoarthritis: evaluation according to an observational multicenter clinical trial].

BACKGROUND: The combined use of intramuscular injection glycosaminoglycan peptide complex (GPC) and oral diacerein can increase the effectiveness of treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). AIM: Compare the effectiveness of combination GPC + diacerein and GPC monotherapy in the treatment of OA in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of the results of a 12-week multicenter observational non-interventional study of the effectiveness of GPC (Rumalon, a course of intramuscular injections 3 times a week, №25) in patients with moderate/severe OA (n=2955) requiring regular administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The analysis identified a group of patients (n=414) who received GPC in combination with diacerein 100 mg/day (Diaflex Rompharm). The therapeutic effect was compared in the groups of GPC monotherapy (n=2541) and the combination of GPC with diacerein. These groups did not differ in average age (61.411.8 and 61.911.3 years), both were dominated by women (76.3 and 70.3%), there was approximately equal intensity of pain during movement and impaired joint function: 6.11.8/6.01.6 and 4.92.1/5.11.8 (according to the numerical rating scale 010). The dynamics of pain intensity, the need for NSAIDs, and the frequency of adverse events (AE) were compared 12 weeks after the start of treatment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the majority of patients with OA both on the background of GPC monotherapy and combined use of GPC and diacerein, there was a significant improvement. The number of patients with pain reduction 50% was 54.3 and 62.8% (p0.001), NSAID administration was completely stopped in 66.7 and 77.5% (p0.001), respectively. The effectiveness of the combination of GPC and diacerein was significantly higher than that of GPC monotherapy in OA of the knee joint, hip joint, and generalized OA. AE from the gastrointestinal tract was observed in 7.8 and 8.9%, arterial hypertension in 6.3 and 4.6%, allergic reactions in 0.3 and 0.5% of patients (not significant). CONCLUSION: The application of the code of civil procedure is an effective treatment for OA. The combination of GPC and diacerein provides a more significant improvement than GPC monotherapy. GPC and diacerein (including in combination) are well tolerated and rarely cause AE.

[Control of pain in the early post-traumatic period in the outpatient practice. Results of the multi-center observational study RAPTOR (Rational Analgesia PostTraumatic: an Observational Research)].

AIM: Evaluate the frequency, nature and course of PTP, as well as the effectiveness and safety of NSAIDs in PTP in real clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The assessment of the condition and need for NSAIDs (original meloxicam) in 1115 outpatient patients who suffered a fracture of the radius (32.2%), injury to the knee (35.2%) or ligaments of the ankle (32.6%); women/men 51.5 and 48.5%, average age 46.915.5 years. We evaluated the dynamics of pain intensity (on a numerical rating scale NRS 010) at rest and during movement, the preservation of moderate and severe pain, as well as the development of adverse drugs reactions (ADR) to NSAIDs 48 weeks after injury. RESULTS: The average intensity of pain during movement decreased from 7.031.66 to 2.211.38 (p0.001), at rest from 4.462.07 to 0.710.989 (p0.001). The number of people with pain severity 4 in the NRS in 48 weeks after the radius fracture, injury of the knee and ligaments of ankle was 21.0, 16.9 and 11.9%, with moderate or severe impairment of the injured limb 40.4, 26.2 and 16.3%, respectively. The need for taking NSAIDs up to 7 days was noted in 43.3%, 714 days-in 41.8%, more than 2 weeks or constantly in 14.9% of patients. Weak or moderate ADR were observed in 20.8% of patients, mainly dyspepsia and hypertension. Discontinuation of NSAIDs due to ADR was required in only 2.6% of patients. Pain retention 4 in NRS was associated with initially expressed pain (7 in NRS) OR 2.75 (95% CI 0.834.13; p0.001) and the presence of osteoarthritis of knee and/or hip OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.032.34; p=0.039). CONCLUSION: PTP decreases rapidly in most patients after a radius fracture, injury of the knee, and ankle ligament injury while taking the original meloxicam. However, in a significant part of patients, moderate or severe PTP persists after 48 weeks, which requires prolonged analgesic therapy and active rehabilitation.

[Damage to periarticular soft tissues in real clinical practice: frequency, nature, effectiveness of non - steroidal anti - inflammatory drugs].

Damage to periarticular soft tissues is a common pathology that causes severe pain and impaired function of the musculoskeletal system. AIM: To determine the frequency, nature and clinical features of damage to periarticular soft tissues in real clinical practice, as well as the effectiveness of non - steroidal anti - inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the debut of treatment of this pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the observational study, the frequency of defeat of the periarticular soft tissues in the structure of visits to 68 outpatient orthopedic surgeons in different cities of Russia for 1 month was estimated. Assessed the nature and dynamics of clinical manifestations during treatment in 1227 patients with defeat of the periarticular soft tissues. NSAIDs, mainly the original meloxicam, were used as a "first line" treatment for damage of the periarticular soft tissues. The results of treatment were evaluated after 10-14 days at a repeat visit of patients. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with damage of the periarticular soft tissues was 15.8% of the total number of people who applied for outpatient care. Among 1227 patients (men 57.5%, average age 51.3±15.5 years) who were observed in the dynamics, prevailed were those with damage of the periarticular soft tissues of the knee joint area (knee joint enthesopathy, prepatellar bursitis, tendonitis/ bursitis of the goose foot area) - 21.2%, feet (plantar fasciitis, calcaneal spur) - 16.9%, shoulder (tendonitis of the muscles of the shoulder rotators) - 16.4% and the elbow (lateral and medial epicondylitis) - 15.3%. During treatment, there was a significant decrease in the total severity of pain - from 6.58±1.61 to 2.48±1.60 points on an 11-point numerical rating scale (p.

[What factors affect the effectiveness of long - term analgesic therapy for osteoarthritis? Data analysis of the multi - center 3-month PARACELSUS study].

There are factors that can affect the effectiveness of treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). Aim to identify factors affecting the effectiveness of long - term analgesic therapy in OA. Materials and methods. The study included 6448 patients (70.9% female and 29.1% male), middle age 57.8±10.2 years, with severe pain [≥40 mm on the visual analog scale]. All patients received the preparation of avocado - soybean unsaponifiables (ASU) 300 mg/day. For pain relief at the beginning and during the study, the drug Ketoprofen lysine salt (KLS) 320 mg/day was used. The efficiency criterion was pain reduction ≥50% and satisfaction with treatment ≥4 on a 5-point scale. The influence of a number of factors on the result of treatment was evaluated. Results. For 3 months of treatment, the pain decreased from 63.7±12.0 to 14.2±11.7 mm VAS. The result was evaluated as "good" or "excellent" 81.7% of patients. Adverse reactions were rare. In total, a good response to therapy was noted in 87.4% of patients. Gender, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, type 2 diabetes mellitus, poor effect of non - steroidal anti - inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Symptomatic Slow-Acting Drugs in Osteoarthritis (SYSADOA) in history did not affect the result. The effect was lower in persons >65 years [odds ratio (OR) 0.418; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.342-0.509, p2 by Kellgren-Lawrence (OR 0.556; 95% CI 0.298-0.738, p.

[The efficacy of meloxicam in acute back pain: results of an observational non-interventional multicenter study]. / Éffektivnost' meloksikama pri ostroi boli v spine: dannye nabliudatel'nogo neinterventsionnogo mnogotsentrovogo issledovaniia.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (meloxicam) in acute nonspecific back pain (NSBP) depending on influence of clinical and anamnestic factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The studied group included 2078 patients presented with an acute NSBP. All study subjects received meloxicam in a dose of 15 mg/day: 86.1% were given intramuscular meloxicam injections for the first 3-5 days and then switched to an oral meloxicam and 13.9% received an oral meloxicam throughout the therapy. Skeletal muscle relaxants (SMR) and oral or intramuscular group B vitamins were also prescribed to 52.3% and 17.4% of study patients, respectively. Pain was assessed on a 10-point numerical rank scale (NRS). The study assessed the rate of complete pain relief within a 2-weeks NSAID therapy. RESULTS: Complete pain relief was achieved in 75.2% of study patients, mean period of treatment was 8.61±5.53 days. Adverse events were observed in 4.6% of patients. Age <65 years, first NSBP episode and a history of good response to NSAIDs were associated with better treatment outcomes. A severe baseline pain (NRS score ≥7), pain persistence at rest, at nights and, especially, sciatica were associated with poorer treatment outcomes. Co-administration of SMR and group B vitamins did not increase chances for pain relief compared to the NSAID monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Meloxicam in a dose of 15 mg/day is an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of acute NSBP. The analgesic effect of NSAIDs is higher in young patients, patients with the first episode of NBC and a good response to NSAIDs in history. Treatment of patients with NSBP in the presence of severe pain, maintaining pain at rest and at night, and in case of sciatica, requires special control and integrated treatment.

Do glucocorticoids affect the development of ulcers and erosions of the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients taking NSAIDs.

AIM: To assess the frequency of ulceration and erosion in patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) receiving NSAIDs, depending on the concomitant use of GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparison was made of the incidence of gastrointestinal lesions detected in patients with RD during endoscopic examination in one medical center for 2007-2016. Three groups were formed: in group 1 patients took only NSAIDs (n=4823, women 80.7%, age 51.1 + 15.4 years), in group 2 patients took NSAIDs and GC (n = 1608, women 89, 8%, age 50.4 + 14.6 years), in group 3 - only patients took GC (n=1135, women 92.7%, age 44.1 + 15.3 years). The detection of multiple erosions (>10, ME) and gastric and / or duodenal ulcers was as-sessed. RESULTS: The frequency of ME and ulcers in patients of groups 1 and 2 did not differ significantly: 10.5% and 8.5%, odds ratio 0.799 (95% confidence interval 0.546-1.169, p=0.072). Risk factors, such as age > 65 years, ulcer history and low-dose aspirin, did not affect this pattern. The incidence of ME and ulcers was significantly lower in Group 3 patients than in Groups 1 and 2: 6.3% (p<0.001, p=0.032). CONCLUSION: The use of GC does not increase the risk of erosion and ulcers of the upper GI tract when taking NSAIDs.

Factors affecting the results of analgesic therapy. Results of the Russian multicentre study of NOTE (NSAID: Open-label Trial of Efficacy).

AIM: To identify factors affecting the effectiveness of NSAIDs in patients with OA and LBP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2-week course of NSAIDs in OA and LBP in real clinical practice. The study group consisted of 3604 patients with OA and LBP (60.6% women and 39.4% men, mean age 55.0±13.4 years). According to the study design, aceclofenac (Airtal) and other NSAIDs used in the ratio 1:1. The main criterion of effectiveness was the frequency of complete pain relief after 2 weeks of therapy. In addition, the decrease of pain and general health were determined on a 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS). We compared the frequency of complete pain relief in patients who had and did not have the studied factors. The value of the studied factors was determined using OR (95% CI). RESULTS: Most patients received aceclofenac (54.9%), as well as diclofenac (2.0%), ketoprofen (1.9%), lornoxicam (2.2%), meloxicam (13.7%), naproxen (2.1%), nimesulide (5.8%), celecoxib (5.9%), ethicoxib (7.1%) and other NSAIDs (4.4%); 56.2% of patients received muscle relaxants, mainly tolperisone (74.7%), vitamin B (10.4%), and proton pump inhibitors (42.8%). Complete pain relief was achieved in 54.8% of patients. The pain decrease and general health improvement were (for NRS) 63.9±13.4% and 61.7±14.8%, respectively. The efficacy of aceclofenac was slightly higher than in the whole group: complete pain relief was in 59.9% of patients. Adverse events in aceclofenac use were observed in 2.3% of patients, other NSAIDs-from 2.4 to 14.1%. The frequency of complete pain relief was higher in men: OR 1,239 (95% CI 1.08-1.418; p=0.002), who had the first episode of pain - OR 3.341 (95% CI 2.873-3.875; p=0.000), a good" response " to NSAIDs in history - OR 1.656 (95% CI 1.385-1.980; p=0.000) and received NSAIDs in combination with muscle relaxants - OR 1.218 (95% CI 1.067-1.390; p=0.004). The effect of therapy is lower in patients 65 years and older-OR 0,378 (95% CI 0.324-0.442; p=0,000), with body mass index >30 kg/m² - OR 0.619 (95% CI 0.529-0.723; p=0.000), with severe pain (≥7 points NRS) - OR 0.662 (95% CI 0.580-0.756; p=0.002), with pain at rest, - OR 0.515 (95% CI 0.450-0,589; p=0.000), pain at night - OR 0.581 (95% CI 0.501-0.672; p=0.000) and the presence of stiffness - OR 0.501 (95% CI 0.438-0,573; p=0.000). Treatment results are significantly worse in the cases of combination of LBP and joint pain, as well as pain in the trochanter major and pes anserinus area (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: NSAIDs are the first-line medications for the pain treatment in LBP and OA. Aceclofenac is effective and safe in this conditions. When carrying out analgesic therapy should take into account factors that affect the effectiveness of treatment: old age, overweight, insufficient effect of NSAIDs in history, severe pain, signs of "inflammatory" pain, multiple sources of pain.

[Therapy for acute/subacute musculoskeletal pain: results of the ATUSA (Analgesic Treatment Using a Systemic Algorithm) observational study]. / Terapiia ostroi/podostroi skeletno-myshechnoi boli: rezul'taty nabliudatel'nogo issledovaniia ALISA (Anal'geticheskoe Lechenie s Ispol'zovaniem Sistemnogo Algoritma).

AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of therapy for acute/subacute musculoskeletal pain (MSP) by applying an individualized pathogenetic approach (an algorithm) elaborated on the basis of Russian experts' recommendations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 262 physicians treating patients with rheumatic diseases participated in the ATUSA (Analgesic Treatment Using a Systemic Algorithm) program. The study enrolled 3,304 patients (54.3% women, 45.7% men; mean age, 48.6±14.3 years) with osteoarthritis, nonspecific back pain (NBP), and rheumatic diseases of periarticular soft tissues, who had experienced MSP. Treatment was performed in accordance with the following algorithm: the first prescribed medication was nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (aceclofenac): paracetamol and/or tramadol and a topical NSAID in case of contraindications and muscle relaxants in case of indications. The results of treatment were assessed after 7, 14, and 28 days. The treatment was corrected during each visit; the NSAID was, if necessary, changed; corticosteroids were locally injected; antidepressants or anticonvulsant drugs were used. The investigators assessed dynamic changes in pain using a 0-10 paint intensity numeric rating scale (NRS), the number of patients, in whom MSP was completely relieved, and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: The first prescribed medication was oral NSAIDs in 97.5% of the patients and those in combination with a muscle relaxant in 67.6%. By visit 4, MSP decreased from 6.9±1.5 to 2.2±1.3 NRS scores. After 28 days, only 16.2% of patients continued to need analgesics. 88.4% of the patients rated treatment results as good or excellent. NSAID switching was required in 8.1% of cases; local glucocorticosteroid injections were needed in 1.9%; there was a need for the use of an antidepressant or anticonvulsant in 1.5% and for hospitalization in 0.25%. Adverse events were observed in 2.2% of patients. The efficiency of treatment (complete pain relief after 28 days) was influenced by the following factors: NRS diagnosis (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.67 to 3.11), age ≥65 years (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.98), moderate pain (NRS scores of ≤7) at the beginning of the study (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.99 to 3.48), mild/moderate pain (NRS scores of <4) after 7 days of therapy (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.89 to 3.33), and the use of muscle relaxants (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.96) (p<0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: The comprehensive pathogenetic approach used in analgesic therapy provides an effective and relatively safe relief of MSP in most patients with NBP and osteoarthritis.

[Meloxicam in Russia: 20 years together]. / Meloksikam v Rossii: 20 let vmeste.

Meloxicam is one of the most commonly used representatives of the group of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed in our country. It has been used in Russian clinical practice for 20 years and established itself as an effective and rather safe analgesic and anti-inflammatory medications. During this period almost 48 million packages of brand-name meloxicam have been sold; millions of people in our country have been successfully treated with this drug. During this period, there have been at least 29 Russian clinical trials of brand-name meloxicam, which covered 3,736 patients. In all the trials, meloxicam has demonstrated a good therapeutic potential (a substantial improvement in more than 75% of patients) and a low incidence of side effects, which averaged 6.4% (30.5% in the control groups). The good tolerability of brand-name meloxicam (Movalis) is confirmed by a total of 120 spontaneous reports of the adverse events due to this drug, which were sent to the Federal Service for Health Supervision in December 2008 to July 2015 (over the last 7 years). This number seems negligible (nearly 30 million packages) if the amount of meloxicam sold over the period is taken into account. Extensive experience in clinical practice with this drug and a wide series of national clinical trials support the good reputation of brand-name meloxicam among Russian physicians and patients. This review briefly gives the data of Russian and main foreign clinical trials of the therapeutic effect and safety of meloxicam.

[Meloxicam: the golden mean of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs].

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are most commonly used to treat acute and chronic pain in locomotor system (LMS) diseases. However, their administration may be accompanied by the development of dangerous complications as organic and functional disorders of the cardiovascular system (CVS) and gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Physicians have currently a wide range of NSAIDs at their disposal; but none of the representatives of this group can be considered the best. Thus, highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (Coxibs) are substantially safer for GIT; however, their use is clearly associated with the increased risk of severe cardiovascular events. Nonselective NSAIDs, such as naproxen or ketoprofen, are safer for CVS, but more frequently cause significant GIT organic and functional disorders. Moderately selective NSAIDs, such as meloxicam (movalis), conceivably could be the most acceptable choice for treating the majority of patients in this situation. This drug has been long and extensively used in global clinical practice and has gained the confidence of physicians and patients. The major benefits of meloxicam are its proven efficacy, convenient treatment regimen, relatively low risk of complications as organic and functional disorders of the GIT and CVD and good compatibility with low-dose aspirin.

[Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in case of ankylosing spondylitis: long and persistently!].

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are extensively used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases to relieve pain and signs of inflammation. However, when treated for ankylosing spondylosis (AS), NSAIDS exert both symptomatic and structure-modifying effects, by slowing down the development of vertebral ankylosis. The effect of these drugs, which underlines the formation of syndesmophytes, may be associated with their anti-inflammatory activity and ability to suppress abnormal bone proliferation. There is convincing evidence to support the capacity of NSAIDs, when long and continuously used, to reduce the rates of X-ray progression of AS. So the continuous use of NSAIDs must be now considered to be a mandatory component of pharmacotherapy for this disease. Their use should be continued even after achieving a marked clinical improvement. At the same time, this situation requires that the development of adverse reactions as structural and functional diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and cardiovascular system be thoroughly controlled in this situation. The danger of these complications determines the need for a physician's attention, obligatory consideration of risk factors, and rational choice of the safest NSAIDs.

[Clinical, endoscopic and morphological manifestations of oesophageal lesion in systemic scleroderma].

UNLABELLED: Oesophageal lesion is the commonest visceral manifestation of systemic scleroderma (SSD) affecting the quality of life and fraught with serious complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical, endoscopic andmorphological manifestations of oesophageal lesion in systemic scleroderma and its relationships with other clinical symptoms and pharmacotherapy of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 479 patients with SSD (93.7% women, 6.3% men, mean age 48.7 +/- 19.2 yr). All of them underwent EGDS in 2005-2010. 123 patients were examined for the detection of Barrett's oesophagus (BO), total screening regardless of complaints was conducted in 2010. Control group included 1018 age and sex-matched patients with RA who underwent EGDS in 2008-2009. RESULTS: Oesophageal lesions occurred much more frequently in SSD than in RA. Oesophageal symptoms were documented in 70.0 and 29.9% cases, non-erosive oesopahgitis in 28.8 and 1.5%, erosive esophagitis in 22.5 and 2.2% ulcers in 0.8 and 0% (p < 0.001). BO manifested as intestinal metaplasia (histological study of mucosal biopsy) was found in 30 SSD patients (4.2%). Screening revealed BO in 8.9% of the patients. The development of erosive oesophagitis was unrelated to the age of the patients, duration of the disease and its form (localized or diffusive), lung pathology or Sjogren's syndrome. Cytotoxic medicines significantly increased the frequency of erosive oesophagitis, it tended to increase under effect of NSAID and low doses of aspirin. Long-term intake of PPI did not reduce the risk of oesophagitis and BO. CONCLUSION: Half of the patients with SSD have oesophagitis. Over 20% of them suffer its complications (erosion and ulcers) and 9% have BO. All such patients need endoscopic study ofoesophagus regardless of clinical symptoms.

[Combined treatment of gastric ulcers induced by nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs. Results of 4-week population-based controlled trial of efficacy of proton pump inhibitor combination with tripotassium bismuth dicitrate].

AIM: To study efficacy of a combination of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and bismuth tripotassium dicitrate (BTD) in gastric ulcers (GU) induced by non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAD) in rheumatic patients with factors affecting PPI efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty rheumatic patients entered the study (5 males and 45 females, mean age 63.5 +/- 6.2 years) with NSAD-induced GU. Criteria of participation in the study: ulcer size > 1.0 cm, 2 and more ulcers, administration of glucocorticoids (GC) and/or cytotoxic drugs. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 patients received omeprasol 20 mg twice a day + BTD 240 mg twice a day; group 2 patients received omeprasol alone 20 mg twice a day. The groups were matched by demographic and clinical parameters, consisted mainly of women with rheumatoid arthritis, most of the patients took GC, methotrexate or leflunamid. The result of the treatment was evaluated by the findings of endoscopic examination 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Three patients from group 1 and 2 patients from group 2 were withdrawn from the study. For 4 weeks ulcer heeling was achieved in 15 patients of group 1 (68.2%) and 8 patients of group 2 (34.8%), p = 0.038. On week 8 ulcers healed in 86.3 and 78.3% patients, respectively. Severe side effects were absent. CONCLUSION: Combination of omeprasol with BTD stimulated heeling of NSAD-induced gastric ulcer.