Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 24(1): 68-73, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30479581

ABSTRACT

AIM: To present a proposed gastric cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning protocol for an institution that have not introduced volumetric modulated arc therapy in clinical practice. A secondary aim was to determine the impact of 2DkV set-up corrections on target coverage and organ at risk (OAR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty consecutive patients were treated with a specially-designed non-coplanar 7-field IMRT technique. The isocenter-shift method was used to estimate the impact of 2DkV-based set-up corrections on the original base plan (BP) coverage. An alternative plan was simulated (SP) by taking into account isocenter shifts. The SP and BP were compared using dose-volume histogram (DVH) plots calculated for the internal target volume (ITV) and OARs. RESULTS: Both plans delivered a similar mean dose to the ITV (100.32 vs. 100.40%), with no significant differences between the plans in internal target coverage (5.37 vs. 4.96%). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between the maximal dose to the spinal cord (67.70 and 67.09%, respectively) and volume received 50% of the prescribed dose of: the liver (62.11 vs. 59.84%), the right (17.62 vs. 18.58%) and left kidney (29.40 vs. 30.48%). Set-up margins (SM) were computed as 7.80 mm, 10.17 mm and 6.71 mm in the left-right, cranio-caudal and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Presented IMRT protocol (OAR dose constraints with selected SM verified by 2DkV verification) for stomach treatment provided optimal dose distribution for the target and the critical organs. Comparison of DVH for the base and the modified plan (which considered set-up uncertainties) showed no significant differences.

2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(21): e853, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26020391

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Active specific immunotherapy of cancer requires an efficient induction and effector phase. The induction covers potent activation of anti-tumor response, whereas effector breaks the immunosuppression. We report efficacy of therapeutic melanoma vaccine (AGI-101H) used alone in advanced disease as a candidate for further combined treatment. In adjuvant setting in patients with resected metastases AGI-101H combined with surgery of recurring disease demonstrated long-term survival. Seventy-seven patients with nonresectable melanoma (8% IIIB, 21% IIIC, 71% IV) were enrolled. AGI-101H was administered 8× every 2 weeks, and then every month. At progression, maintenance was continued or induction was repeated and followed by maintenance. Median follow-up was 139.3 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 17.3 months; in patients with WHO 0-1 was 20.3 months. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were observed in 19.4% and 9% of pts. Disease control rate was 54.5% of pts. The median CR+PR duration was 32 months. Reinduction was performed in 36.3% patients following disease progression with 46.6% of CR+PR. No grade 3/4 adverse events were observed. Treatment with AGI-101H of melanoma patients is safe and effective. AGI-101H is a good candidate for combinatorial treatment with immune check-points inhibitors or tumor hypoxia normalizators. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number 2008-003373-40.


Subject(s)
Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Interleukin-6/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Receptors, Interleukin-6/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cancer Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Interleukin-6/administration & dosage , Interleukin-6/adverse effects , Male , Melanoma/surgery , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Remission Induction , Survival Analysis
3.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 18(2): 107-11, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24416541

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic effect of intraoperative radiotherapy, describe the method, and examine the occurrence of side effects and quality of life. BACKGROUND: Breast conserving therapy has recently become a standard treatment modality in patients with early invasive cancer. Radiotherapy, along with surgery, is an integral part of such treatment. The important thing of radiotherapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumour bed. One of the methods is the intraoperative radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis comprised sixty Tis-T2N0-1A breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery. Patients' mean age was 57 years (range: 32-73 years). Intraoperative radiation therapy was delivered in the operating theatre during surgery and involved a single dose of 10 Gy with an electron beam of 4, 6, 9 or 12 MeV. After that, all patients were treated with whole breast irradiation. During one year observation photos and side effects examination were made. RESULTS: Physical and imaging examinations performed during a one-year follow-up revealed no local or distant relapse and good tolerance of IORT. Acute mild responses to the radiotherapy occurred in 23.3% of patients. Based on the examination, a good and very good cosmetic effect was found in 78.3%, with 83.3% of patients evaluating their treatment effects in the same way. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its exceptional physical and radiobiological properties, intraoperative radiation therapy can be a good alternative to other methods of boosting dose to the post-operative site in management of low stage breast cancer, enabling a precise therapy to the tumour bed.

4.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 21(6): 773-83, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22577889

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Two single arm, Phase II trials (3 and 5) were undertaken to determine the efficacy and toxicity of an adjuvant treatment using Hyper-IL-6 gene-modified whole-cell allogeneic melanoma vaccine in patients with stage IIIB-IV resected disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ninety-seven and 99 patients were enrolled into Trials 3 and 5, respectively. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary was overall survival (OS). Vaccine was administered eight times every 2 weeks (induction), every month (maintenance) until patient's death. At progression, maintenance was continued or induction was repeated followed by maintenance. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.5 and 6.2 years for Trials 3 and 5, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. An extension of DFS and OS was observed, when compared with historical non-treated controls. DFS probability at 5 years for Trials 3 and 5 was, respectively, 54.8% and 40.6% for stage IIIB, 25.0% and 24.0% for IIIC, and 8.5% and 17.7% for IV. OS probability at 5 years was, respectively, 66.7% and 56.3% for IIIB, 43.8% and 39.8% for IIIC, and 26.1% and 41.2% for IV. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous vaccination, regardless of the disease progression, re-induction, and immunization of patients until death resulted in patients a long-term survival.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-6/administration & dosage , Melanoma/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Cancer Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Interleukin-6/adverse effects , Interleukin-6/immunology , Male , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
5.
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) ; 16(1): 16-25, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23788850

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE STUDY: Helical tomotherapy is one of the methods of radiotherapy. This method enables treatment implementation for a wide spectrum of clinical cases. The vast array of therapeutic uses of helical tomotherapy results directly from the method of dose delivery, which is significantly different from the classic method developed for conventional linear accelerators. The paper discusses the method of dose delivery by a tomotherapy machine. Moreover, an analysis and presentation of treatment plans was performed in order to show the therapeutic possibilities of the applied technology. Dose distributions were obtained for anaplastic medulloblastoma, multifocal metastases to brain, vulva cancer, tongue cancer, metastases to bones, and advanced skin cancer. Tomotherapy treatment plans were compared with conventional linear accelerator plans. RESULTS: Following the comparative analysis of tomotherapy and conventional linear accelerator plans, in each case we obtained the increase in dose distribution conformity manifested in greater homogeneity of doses in the radiation target area for anaplastic medulloblastoma, multifocal metastases to brain, vulva cancer, metastases to bones, and advanced skin cancer, and the reduction of doses in organs at risk (OAR) for anaplastic medulloblastoma, vulva cancer, tongue cancer, and advanced skin cancer. The time of treatment delivery in the case of a tomotherapy machine is comparable to the implementation of the plan prepared in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique for a conventional linear accelerator. In the case of tomotherapy the application of a fractional dose was carried out in each case during one working period of the machine. For a conventional linear accelerator the total value of the fractional dose in the case of anaplastic medulloblastoma and metastases to bones was delivered using several treatment plans, for which a change of set-up was necessary during a fraction. CONCLUSION: The obtained results confirm that tomotherapy offers the possibility to obtain precise treatment plans together with the simplification of the therapeutic system.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...