A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2.

Rapid identification of the rise and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern remains critical for monitoring of the efficacy of diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and control strategies. A wide range of SARS-CoV-2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods have been developed over the last years, but cross-sequence technology benchmarking studies have been scarce. In the current study, 26 clinical samples were sequenced using five protocols: AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina), EasySeq RC-PCR SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina/NimaGen), Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Thermo Fisher), custom primer sets (Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)), and capture probe-based viral metagenomics (Roche/Illumina). Studied parameters included genome coverage, depth of coverage, amplicon distribution, and variant calling. The median SARS-CoV-2 genome coverage of samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values of 30 and lower ranged from 81.6 to 99.8% for, respectively, the ONT protocol and Illumina AmpliSeq protocol. Correlation of coverage with PCR Ct values varied per protocol. Amplicon distribution signatures differed across the methods, with peak differences of up to 4 log10 at disbalanced positions in samples with high viral loads (Ct values ≤ 23). Phylogenetic analyses of consensus sequences showed clustering independent of the workflow used. The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 reads in relation to background sequences, as a (cost-)efficiency metric, was the highest for the EasySeq protocol. The hands-on time was the lowest when using EasySeq and ONT protocols, with the latter additionally having the shortest sequence runtime. In conclusion, the studied protocols differed on a variety of the studied metrics. This study provides data that assist laboratories when selecting protocols for their specific setting.

Improved diagnosis of viral encephalitis in adult and pediatric hematological patients using viral metagenomics.

Metagenomic sequencing is a powerful technique that enables detection of the full spectrum of pathogens present in any specimen in a single test. Hence, metagenomics is increasingly being applied for detection of viruses in clinical cases with suspected infections of unknown etiology and a large number of relevant potential causes. This is typically the case in patients presenting with encephalitis, in particular when immunity is impaired by underlying disorders. In this study, viral metagenomics has been applied to a cohort of hematological patients with encephalitis of unknown origin. Because viral loads in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with encephalitis are generally low, the technical performance of a metagenomic sequencing protocol with viral enrichment by capture probes targeting all known vertebrate viral sequences was studied. Subsequently, the optimized viral metagenomics protocol was applied to a cohort of hematological patients with encephalitis of unknown origin. Viral enrichment by capture probes increased the viral sequence read count of metagenomics on cerebrospinal fluid samples 100 - 10.000 fold, compared to unenriched metagenomic sequencing. In five out of 41 (12%) hematological patients with encephalitis, a virus was detected by viral metagenomics which had not been detected by current routine diagnostics. BK polyomavirus, hepatitis E virus, human herpes virus-6 and Epstein Barr virus were identified by this unbiased metagenomic approach. This study demonstrated that hematological patients with encephalitis of unknown origin may benefit from early viral metagenomics testing as a single step approach.