Medullary reticular formation activity during ingestion and rejection in the awake rat.

The consummatory components of ingestion and rejection, organized in the caudal brainstem, include licking, swallowing, and the oral phase of rejection (gaping). Studies employing electrical-stimulation induced motor activity have localized interneurons controlling these complex motor patterns to the medullary reticular formation (RF), but the characteristics of these neurons during more naturally induced behavior are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to record the activity profiles of RF neurons during licking, swallowing, and oral rejection in response to gustatory stimulation. Two-hundred and two neurons recorded from awake, freely moving rats were broadly classified as orally related (67%) or non-orally related (33%). Orally related neurons included a large number that were rhythmically active during licking (n = 76; 38%). These "lick-rhythmic" neurons were widely distributed in the RF, but were concentrated in the caudal medullary reticular formation adjacent to the hypoglossal nucleus (Probst's region) and further rostral in the intermediate zone (IRt) of the RF. An analysis of autocorrelations determined that lick-rhythmic neurons in these regions were more closely coupled to licking than to lick-rhythmic neurons more lateral in the parvocellular RF (PCRt). In addition to neurons with weak lick-rhythmic activity, the PCRt also contained a disproportionate number of neurons with orosensory or mixed oro-sensorimotor properties. These data provide evidence for functional specialization within different regions of the medullary RF. A high proportion of lick-rhythmic neurons also showed differential activity associated with swallowing (41%) and/or gaping (75%), further suggesting that the different components of ingestion and rejection share brainstem substrates instead of being produced by unique subsets of interneurons.

Differential projections from gustatory responsive regions of the parabrachial nucleus to the medulla and forebrain.

The present study combined extracellular electrophysiology with anterograde and retrograde tracing techniques to determine efferent projections from taste responsive sites within the parabrachial nucleus (PBN). Taste activity was recorded from two distinct regions of the PBN, the waist region consisting of the ventrolateral (VL) and central medial (CM) subnuclei, and the external region, consisting of the external medial (EM) and external lateral (EL) subnuclei. Ascending and descending projections from these two regions differed. Small biotinylated dextran injections placed in taste responsive sites in the waist area produced a prominent descending projection to the medullary parvocellular reticular formation, a projection nearly non-existent from the external region. Differences in ascending projections were more subtle. Projections to the thalamus were bilateral in all cases, however, the waist region had a larger ipsilateral thalamic projection than the external region and the external region had a larger contralateral projection compared to the waist. Central nucleus of amygdala (CNA) projections from the waist area were primarily from posterior tongue responsive sites in VL and terminated in the central medial and lateral CNA subnuclei; external region projections were distributed to the capsular region of CNA. Both the external and waist region projected to substantia innominata (SI). Different efferent projections from the two gustatory responsive regions of the PBN may reflect functional specialization of PBN subnuclei. Descending projections from orally responsive sites in the waist area project to the lateral parvocellular reticular formation, a region implicated in brainstem circuitry underlying consummatory components of ingestive function. The external region, contains cells responsive to pain and oral aversive stimuli, but does not apparently contribute directly to local brainstem functions. Rather, forebrain pathways appear critical to the expression of external region functions.

Motor and premotor mechanisms of licking.

The location, organization and anatomical connections of a central pattern generator (CPG) for licking are discussed. Anatomical and physiological studies suggest a brainstem location distributed within several subdivisions of the medullary reticular formation (RF). The involvement of widespread RF regions is evident from brainstem recording experiments in awake freely moving preparations and studies employing electrical stimulation of the frontal cortex to produce ororhythmic activity. The complex multifunctional properties of RF neurons producing licking are indicated by their activity during licking, swallowing and the rejection of an aversive gustatory stimulus. Anatomical studies place descending inputs to a brainstem CPG for licking to widely distributed areas of both the medial and lateral RF. In contrast, most projections originating from brainstem orosensory nuclei terminate primarily within the lateral RF. Because many pre-oromotor neurons appear concentrated largely in the intermediate zone of the RF (IRt), it is hypothesized that neurons from both lateral and medial sites converge within the IRt to control oromotor function.

Technique for standardization of panoramic radiographs using helium-neon laser guided positioning.

A limitation of the use of panoramic radiography in implant dentistry has been variations in patient positioning, which can produce dissimilar radiographs and is a serious problem in longitudinal investigations. Previous techniques to standardize panoramic radiographs have been cumbersome and technique sensitive. Bilateral helium-neon lasers were mounted on two-axis micrometer translation stages and projected as cross-hairs on a phantom skull. The cross-point of each pattern was superimposed on a facial soft tissue landmark on either side of the skull. Laser coordinates were recorded and an initial radiograph was produced for each of three experimental groups. Two investigators repeated radiographs for each group six times using the original settings. The radiographs were digitized and the variance calculated and compared using a video digital analysis program. Repeat radiographs were compared to the originals by superimposing each pair and measuring the variance in radiographic markers. The variance ranged from 0.1 to 2.2 mm with the experimental groups and from 2.5 to 38.7 mm with the control group. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed no statistical significance (P > 0.125) among each of the experimental groups using the laser system and a significant difference (P < 0.001) when the control group is included in the analysis. Variance for experimental groups was not significant between the examiners (P > 0.45). A laser repositioning system may have application in implant dentistry by standardizing panoramic radiographs for comparisons in long-term investigations.