Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin J Gastroenterol ; 12(3): 269-273, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30446953

ABSTRACT

There are several reports that vouch for the usefulness of diffusion-weighted image (DWI) in making a diagnosis before treatment. However, no study has evaluated the effect of radiotherapy (RT) for unresectable gastric cancer. In the present case report, we evaluated the effectiveness of RT using DWI. An 81-year-old man was hospitalized with a broken bone and then diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer with breeding. He had chorionic renal failure and surgery was impossible. Further, contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were not performed due to renal failure, whereas palliative RT was performed. We followed up the patient using blood test and MRI (DWI) to estimate whether bleeding had stopped or not after radiotherapy. Hemostasis effect was found after 2 weeks of RT. In DWI examination, there was a decrease in the tumor signal intensity 30 days after RT. Similarly, at day 60, the tumor signal intensity further decreased on DWI and the blood test results indicated no progression of anemia. At 4 months after the RT, the patient died because of respiratory failure without any bleeding. DWI is useful not only for the initial diagnosis but also for evaluating the effectiveness of RT.Trial registration: National clinical study registered number: UMIN000026362.


Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/radiotherapy , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Stomach Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged, 80 and over , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemostatic Techniques , Humans , Male , Palliative Care , Stomach Neoplasms/complications
2.
Cancer Invest ; 35(4): 271-276, 2017 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28272913

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I study of sorafenib and intermittent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using cisplatin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Sorafenib was administered continuously, whereas cisplatin was administered once every 3 weeks. We estimated the safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled into this study. The dose-limiting toxicities occurred at sorafenib 800 mg and cisplatin 20 mg/m2. The recommended dose was at sorafenib 400 mg and cisplatin 30 mg/m2. The disease control rate was 73.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This treatment is feasible for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Further evaluation of the regimen in a randomized controlled trial is warranted.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Hepatic Artery , Humans , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Male , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Niacinamide/adverse effects , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Sorafenib
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...