Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 48(12): 1119-1125, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33288374

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical accuracy of a new Maxillary Bone-Dental-Supported guide (MBDS) for osteotomy and maxillary positioning in orthognathic surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The customized MBDS were prototyped through CAD-CAM technology (computer-aided design and manufacturing). The planning image (CT0) was superimposed on the computed tomography scan post-treatment (CT1) and the mean of positional differences between them were obtained tridimensionally at the axes: mediolateral (X), anteroposterior (Y) and vertical (Z). RESULTS: Eleven patients were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mediolateral movement showed the best precision, with a greater mean difference of 0.34 mm at the CI point (central incisor) and less than 0.02 mm at the RM point (right molar). In the vertical direction, the largest mean discrepancy found was 0.50 mm and on the y-axis, anteroposterior, was 0.74 mm, as well as two at the CI point. The skeletal SNA point, on the other hand, showed the smallest average discrepancies: 0.10 mm (x-axis), 0.03 mm (y-axis) and 0 mm (z-axis). Overall, 99.24% of the discrepancies found were less than 2 mm. CONCLUSION: Our results suggests that the double support, osseous and dental, present in that new guide, favored the positional stability of the maxilla and promoted better control of its vertical axis. Furthermore, the function of an osteotomy guide increases the predictability and security of the surgical procedure.


Subject(s)
Orthognathic Surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Computer-Aided Design , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...