ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A problem-based (PBL) medical curriculum was implemented in 1993 at the Medical School of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. The objective of this study was to examine how the planned reduction in scheduled activities, the emphasis on student-centred learning, and the integration of disciplines have been implemented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The schedules in the old and new programmes were the main sources of data. Each scheduled activity was coded according to discipline taught and chosen learning method. RESULTS: The number of hours spent on scheduled activities was much higher in the new programme (n = 4,009) than in the intended (n = 2,974), and it was even slightly higher than in the old programme (n = 3,785). In contrast to plans there was less student-centered learning, and basic science was mainly taught during the two first years. INTERPRETATION: Contrary to plans, the new curriculum in Trondheim has not become a pure PBL curriculum. It is a hybrid model involving a number of learning methods. A high degree of autonomy of the individual faculty members in the planning, and resistance to change among faculty members may have caused less radical changes. This is not necessarily negative; the new model may be a pragmatic synthesis between new and traditional medical education.
