Altered strategy of prophylactic anti-D administration in pregnancy to cover term and post-term - a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to RhD-negative women is most often administered in gestational age (GA) 28-30 weeks with the next anti-D dose administered postpartum. The aim of this study was to analyse the proportion of RhD-negative women where RAADP is not detectable at term and in a pilot study to investigate whether RAADP administered in GA 28 and 38 results in detectable levels at term, post-term and post-delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, 4280 RhD-negative women carrying an RHD positive fetus were included and the proportion with a negative antibody screen at delivery was determined. In the second part, 39 pregnancies were included prospectively, a second dose of RAADP was administered in GA 38 weeks, and anti-D was quantified before the second dose and then weekly for 5 weeks. RESULTS: In the retrospective analysis, 20·5% (856/4280) with RAADP administered in GA 28 were negative in routine antibody screening at delivery. In the small prospective study, 18% (7/39) had a negative antibody screen and 26% (10/39) had levels below 0·005 IU/ml, in the quantification assay, in GA 38. Anti-D prophylaxis administered in GA 38 showed detectable levels of anti-D up to 30 days post-delivery, with concentration at delivery 0·060 ± 0·034 IU/ml (mean ± SD). CONCLUSION: Approximately 20% of the RhD-negative women show non-detectable levels of anti-D at term. A second dose of RAADP at GA 38 results in stable concentrations of anti-D at term, post-term and post-delivery, but with large interindividual variation.

Targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in the prevention of RhD immunisation--outcome of a new antenatal screening and prevention program.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of RhD immunisation after implementation of first trimester non-invasive fetal RHD screening to select only RhD negative women carrying RHD positive fetuses for routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a population-based prospective observational cohort study with historic controls including all maternity care centres and delivery hospitals in the Stockholm region, Sweden. All RhD negative pregnant women were screened for fetal RHD genotype in the first trimester of pregnancy. Anti-D immunoglobulin (250-300 µg) was administered intramuscularly in gestational week 28-30 to participants with RHD positive fetuses. Main outcome measure was the incidence of RhD immunisation developing during or after pregnancy. RESULTS: During the study period 9380 RhD negative women gave birth in Stockholm. Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma was performed in 8374 pregnancies of which 5104 (61%) were RHD positive and 3270 (39%) RHD negative. In 4590 pregnancies with an RHD positive test the women received antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. The incidence of RhD immunisation in the study cohort was 0.26 percent (24/9380) (95% CI 0.15-0.36%) compared to 0.46 percent (86/18546) (95% CI 0.37 to 0.56%) in the reference cohort. The risk ratio (RR) for sensitisation was 0.55 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.87) and the risk reduction was statistically significant (p = 0.009). The absolute risk difference was 0.20 percent, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 500. CONCLUSIONS: Using first trimester non-invasive antenatal screening for fetal RHD to target routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis selectively to RhD negative women with RHD positive fetuses significantly reduces the incidence of new RhD immunisation. The risk reduction is comparable to that reported in studies evaluating the outcome of non selective RAADP to all RhD negative women. The cost-effectiveness of this targeted approach remains to be studied.

Consequences of being Rhesus D immunized during pregnancy and how to optimize new prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the timing of Rhesus D (RhD) immunization in pregnancy and the consequences for the index pregnancy and for subsequent pregnancies to be able to optimize the design of antenatal screening and prevention programs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Stockholm county, Sweden. POPULATION: All RhD immunized pregnant women 1990-2008 before the introduction of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. METHODS: Data were collected from transfusion medicine registers and databases, medical records, the Swedish Medical Birth Register and the National Perinatal Quality Register and entered into a standardized database before analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The order of pregnancy and trimester when immunization occurred and treatment of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. RESULTS: A total of 290 RhD immunized women were included in the study. In 147/290 (51%) of the women, sensitization occurred with their first-born child and in 96/290 (33%) it occurred with their second-born child. Anti-D antibodies developed during the second or third trimester in 212/290 (73%) and in 61/290 (21%) at term or after delivery. In subsequent pregnancies 56% (144/259) of the neonates required treatment for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, at least half of the cases could potentially have been avoided by routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in the beginning of the third trimester. To optimize the beneficial effects of new prevention programs, we propose providing anti-D prophylaxis in gestational week 28-30 selectively to all RhD-negative women with RhD-positive fetuses.

Noninvasive single-exon fetal RHD determination in a routine screening program in early pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple and robust assay suitable for fetal RHD screening in first-trimester pregnancy and to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the test after its implementation in an unselected pregnant population. METHODS: Pregnant women attending their first antenatal visit were included, and fetal RHD determination was performed for all women who typed RhD-negative by routine serology. DNA was extracted by an automated system and quantitative polymerase chain reaction was done by an assay based on exon 4. Reporting criteria were simple and strict. RESULTS: Four thousand one hundred eighteen pregnancies, with a median gestational age of 10 weeks, were included. After 211 (5.1%) reanalyses, fetal RHD was reported positive in 2,401 (58.3%), negative in 1,552 (37.7%), and inconclusive in 165 (4.0%) based on the first sample. After a second sample in 147 of 165, only 14 remained inconclusive, all resulting from a weak or silent maternal RHD gene. Using blood group serology of the newborns as the gold standard, the false-negative rate was 55 of 2,297 (2.4%) and the false-positive rate was 15 of 1,355 (1.1%). After exclusion of samples obtained before gestational week 8, the false-negative rate was 23 of 2,073 (1.1%) and the false-positive rate was 14 of 1,218 (1.1%). Both sensitivity and specificity were close to 99% provided samples were not collected before gestational week 8. From gestational week 22, sensitivity was 100%. CONCLUSION: Fetal RHD detection in early pregnancy using a single-exon assay in a routine clinical setting is feasible and accurate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Procedure-related complications and perinatal outcome after intrauterine transfusions in red cell alloimmunization in Stockholm.

INTRODUCTION: We present a review of all cases of intravascular transfusions in red cell alloimmunization over a time span of 20 years in Stockholm. The aim of the study is to compare our results with published results from larger centers and to identify areas that can be further improved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all women treated with intrauterine transfusions due to erythrocyte immunization in our hospital between June 1990 and June 2010. Primary outcome variables were fetal and neonatal survival, procedure-related complications and gestational age at delivery. RESULTS: A total of 284 intrauterine transfusions were performed in 84 pregnancies, with an overall survival rate of 91.8%. Procedure-related and fatal complications occurred in the present study in 4.9 and 1.4% of fetuses or neonates, respectively. Procedure-related complications were significantly more common in free-loop transfusions than in transfusions in the intrahepatic part of the umbilical vein (OR: 5.4, p = 0.025). There was no significant difference between the intrahepatic and the placental cord insertion route (p = 0.83). Gestational age at first transfusion was significantly associated with an increased risk of a procedure-related complication (OR: 0.8, p = 0.019). Of the live-born infants, 24% of the neonates were born before gestational week 34. DISCUSSION: Our study confirms previous studies demonstrating favorable results with intravascular transfusions.