Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 86: 261-268, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793199

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of a surgical mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction is well established and has been used for long with minor complications, whereas the omental flap has been used for decades in reconstructive surgery. AIM: To demonstrate the increased angiogenic capacity and the reduced inflammatory markers of a synthetic mesh when used in combination with an omental flap. Furthermore, we compare two independent meshes when used alone or in combination with the omental flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight rats were included in the study. To determine the effect of using an omental flap under two different meshes, the animals were separated into four groups, i.e., group A (flap + mesh 1), group B (flap + mesh 1 + silicone), group C (flap + mesh 2), and group D (flap + mesh 2 + silicone). A silicone sheet was placed as a barrier between the mesh and the flap. All groups were sacrificed 8 weeks post-operatively. RESULTS: The use of a silicone sheet barrier between any of the two synthetic meshes and the omental flap in an abdominal wall defect is accompanied by a markedly reduced angiogenesis in terms of a cluster of differentiation (CD)-34 (p < 0.001) and factor VIII (p = 0.0012) and by increased inflammatory response CD-68 (p = 0.0024) and visual scoring (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Τhe increased angiogenic capacity and the reduced inflammatory markers of a synthetic surgical mesh when used in combination with an omental flap make it a useful option in the reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect on a large or contaminated wound.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Abdominoplasty , Rats , Animals , Surgical Mesh , Prospective Studies , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Silicones , Abdominal Wall/surgery
2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 65(1): e15-7, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21875822

ABSTRACT

Augmentation phalloplasty of the normal penis although is gaining popularity among a subgroup of men, is not free of complications. A 27 years old healthy man with normal functioning penis underwent a lipofilling penile augmentation. The procedure was complicated by a post-operative haematoma and infection resulting in a full thickness dorsal penile skin necrosis and a pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap was required for reconstruction. His presentation, operation and final outcome are reported and the possible options for reconstruction are discussed.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Penis/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgery, Plastic/adverse effects , Surgical Flaps/blood supply , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/physiopathology , Hematoma/surgery , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Surgery, Plastic/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/physiopathology , Surgical Wound Infection/surgery , Thigh/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 64(12): 1621-6, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21840779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The free anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is now used as a 'workhorse flap'. The donor site morbidity is thought to be minimal, although most evidence derives from questionnaire-based studies rather than rigorous objective clinical assessment. In particular, robust quantitative data on thigh sensibility and quadriceps function is lacking. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive clinical assessment of donor site morbidity. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of consecutive free ALT perforator flaps performed at Salisbury Foundation Trust between March 2008 and April 2010. The donor site was assessed at six months including a questionnaire (symptoms, function), scar analysis (Vancouver Scar Scale, VSS), and evaluation of quadriceps power and lateral thigh sensibility (compared with the contralateral unoperated thigh). RESULTS: One hundred ALT flaps were performed on 97 patients (mean age 46.8 years). The donor site was closed directly in 88 cases and using a split skin graft in 12 cases. At follow-up (n=68), tingling was the most common reported symptom (59%), whereas pain, itching and muscle herniation were reported infrequently. Donor site scars were mostly flat, pale and soft but widened. Pathological scarring was rare. Sensibility was reduced in donor thighs (p<0.001) and correlated with flap width but peak quadriceps contraction was similar between donor and unoperated thighs. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high throughput and diverse application of ALT flap reconstructions during the study period. Reduced sensibility was common around the scar but rarely troublesome. Quadriceps function was not affected even when dissection of intramuscular perforators was required. The ALT is a versatile flap that can deliver a large skin paddle with minimal impact on thigh function.


Subject(s)
Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Surgical Flaps , Thigh/physiology , Transplant Donor Site , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Muscle Strength Dynamometer , Prospective Studies , Transplant Donor Site/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...