Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 86: 261-268, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793199

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of a surgical mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction is well established and has been used for long with minor complications, whereas the omental flap has been used for decades in reconstructive surgery. AIM: To demonstrate the increased angiogenic capacity and the reduced inflammatory markers of a synthetic mesh when used in combination with an omental flap. Furthermore, we compare two independent meshes when used alone or in combination with the omental flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight rats were included in the study. To determine the effect of using an omental flap under two different meshes, the animals were separated into four groups, i.e., group A (flap + mesh 1), group B (flap + mesh 1 + silicone), group C (flap + mesh 2), and group D (flap + mesh 2 + silicone). A silicone sheet was placed as a barrier between the mesh and the flap. All groups were sacrificed 8 weeks post-operatively. RESULTS: The use of a silicone sheet barrier between any of the two synthetic meshes and the omental flap in an abdominal wall defect is accompanied by a markedly reduced angiogenesis in terms of a cluster of differentiation (CD)-34 (p < 0.001) and factor VIII (p = 0.0012) and by increased inflammatory response CD-68 (p = 0.0024) and visual scoring (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Τhe increased angiogenic capacity and the reduced inflammatory markers of a synthetic surgical mesh when used in combination with an omental flap make it a useful option in the reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect on a large or contaminated wound.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Abdominoplasty , Rats , Animals , Surgical Mesh , Prospective Studies , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Silicones , Abdominal Wall/surgery
2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 65(1): e15-7, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21875822

ABSTRACT

Augmentation phalloplasty of the normal penis although is gaining popularity among a subgroup of men, is not free of complications. A 27 years old healthy man with normal functioning penis underwent a lipofilling penile augmentation. The procedure was complicated by a post-operative haematoma and infection resulting in a full thickness dorsal penile skin necrosis and a pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap was required for reconstruction. His presentation, operation and final outcome are reported and the possible options for reconstruction are discussed.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Penis/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgery, Plastic/adverse effects , Surgical Flaps/blood supply , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/physiopathology , Hematoma/surgery , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Surgery, Plastic/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/physiopathology , Surgical Wound Infection/surgery , Thigh/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...