The association of TLR4 gene polymorphisms with the severity of peritonitis in acute inflammatory diseases of the abdominal cavity organs.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To determine the role of TLR4 gene polymorphisms as risk factors for peritonitis severity in patients undergoing surgery for acute inflammatory diseases of the abdominal cavity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The study included 139 patients who were operated on for acute abdominal diseases (acute appendicitis and cholecystitis, perforated gastric or duodenal ulcer, etc.). Depending on the number of points on the modified APACHE II scale, patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 - 1-3 points (63 patients, 45.3%) and Group 2 - 4 or more points (76 patients, 54.7%). Polymorphisms rs1927911, rs2149356 and rs4986790 were determined by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Results: The rs1927911 polymorphism of the TLR4 gene was protective for the development of peritonitis (according to the allelic model, OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27-0.84; p=0.015). Regression analysis revealed a reduced (p=0.015) risk of severe peritonitis in rs1927911 A/A or G/A genotype carriers (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.21-0.84) compared with G/G genotype carriers. There was no effect on the severity of peritonitis of TLR4 polymorphisms rs2149356 and rs4986790. There was a tendency to increase the frequency of the mutant G rs4986790 allele in patients with severe peritonitis (χ2=2.17; p<0.001). The analysis of the association of TLR4 gene polymorphisms with the phenotype of patients showed that carriers of mutant homozygotes and heterozygotes in the presence of severe peritonitis were older, had a tendency to coagulopathy, higher leukocytosis and leukocyte clotting rate. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Thus, the importance of TLR in the development of severe peritonitis was confirmed and the protective role of the rs1927911 promoter polymorphism was established.

ORNIDAZOL-BASED APPLICATION SORBENT WITH NANO SILICA AND ITS ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To investigate the effect of application sorbent based on ornidazole with nanosilicon in experiment and clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: In order to study the effectiveness of the Ornidasil application sorbent for the treatment of purulent wounds, we conducted an experimental study in rats. Also, we studied the effectiveness of the Ornidasil in the clinic for the treatment of patients with diabetic foot syndrome and to prevent the suppuration of postoperative wounds in patients with purulent peritonitis in toxic and terminal stages. RESULTS: Results: The formation of active substance complexes with hydroxylated matrices is due to hydrogen bonds between the oxygen atom of the silanol group of the silica surface and the hydrogen atom of the alcohol group of the ornidazole molecule. This promotes the gradual release of ornidazole from the surface of such a matrix into the wound exudate. Thus, on day 13, 9 experimental rats of group I healed completely, 11 rats had a small wound surface, complete healing occurred on day 15. We also investigated the effectiveness Ornidasil in the clinic. In the comparison group, postoperative wound suppuration occurred in 6 patients (31.6%), and in the main group - in 3 patients (12.5%). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: A study of the effectiveness Ornidasil in the complex treatment of Diabetic foot syndrome showed that in the experimental groups, wound healing occurred 1.6 -1.9 times faster. The use of polyurethane wound protector in combination with Ornidasil reduced the suppuration of postoperative wounds in patients of the main group by 2.5 times relative to patients in the comparison group.

FEMOROPOPLITEAL ANGIOPLASTY VS OPEN SURGERY FOR CHRONIC LIMB-THREATENING ISCHEMIA.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To compare the results of femoro-popliteal PTA vs open surgery in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and analyze clinical efficacy long-term results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Between 2018 - 2019, 145 patients with CLTI who underwent femoro-popliteal arterial segment steno-occlusive lesions (SOL) unilateral revascu¬larization. Open surgery were performed for - 48 (33, 1℅), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for - 73 (50.3%), and were treated with hybrid surgical interventions for - 24 (16.6%). RESULTS: Results: During the analysis, no statistically significant difference was found among the three groups patients indicators. According to the diabetes patients indicator, the differences among the groups are statistically significant (p<0.001), diabetes was present in only 16.7% of open surgical intervention group patients, 45.8% of PTA group patients, 54.8% of the hybrid surgery group patients. In the overall comparison 2-year limb preservation after open surgery 93.8%, after PTA 91.7%, and after hybrid surgery 91.6%; amputations: open surgery - 6.2% PTA- 8.2 %, hybrid surgery -8.3%; exemption from surgical re-intervention: open surgery - 68.7%, PTA- 58.9%, hybrid surgery - 75%. There were no differences in limb preservation and amputation between open surgery, hybrid intervention, and PTA. A difference was found only in reintervention tactic among the open surgery and PTA groups as opposed to the hybrid surgery. CONCLUSION: Сonclusions: Limb salvage and CLTI patients survival after open surgery and PTA who were not performed major amputation in 2 years term after revascularization were comparable regardless of treatment method.