Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine infusions for sedation of postoperative patients requiring intensive caret.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of the alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine were studied in 10 patients requiring postoperative sedation and mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), and compared with previous volunteer data. METHODS: On arrival in the ICU, sedation with dexmedetomidine was commenced with a loading dose of 2.5 microg kg(-1) h(-1) over 10 min followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.7 microg kg(-1) h(-1) into a central vein. Blood samples for measurement of plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were taken during and after sedative infusions at predetermined intervals. Pharmacokinetic variables were estimated using non-compartmental methods. In addition, non-linear mixed effects modelling was used to obtain variable estimates not readily attainable from non-compartmental methods. Respiratory and haemodynamic data were recorded to enable correlation of any adverse events with the calculated pharmacokinetic profile. RESULTS: The harmonic mean distribution half-life of dexmedetomidine was 8.6 min and the harmonic mean terminal half-life was 3.14 h. Steady-state volume of distribution averaged 173 litres, clearance averaged 48.3 litres h(-1), and the mean residence time averaged 3.86 h. CONCLUSIONS: Mean dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic variables seen in postoperative, intensive care patients were similar to those previously found in volunteers, with the exception of the steady-state volume of distribution. A small loading dose provided effective sedation with no adverse events.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on propofol requirements in healthy subjects.

Dexmedetomidine-propofol pharmacodynamic interaction was evaluated in nine healthy subjects in a crossover design. Dexmedetomidine/placebo was infused using a computer-controlled infusion pump (CCIP) to maintain a pseudo-steady-state plasma concentration of 0.66 +/- 0.080 or 0 ng/mL, respectively. Forty-five minutes after the dexmedetomidine/placebo infusion was started, propofol was infused using a second CCIP to achieve a stepwise logarithmically ascending propofol concentration (1.00 to 13.8 microg/mL) profile. Each propofol step lasted 10 min. Blood was sampled for plasma concentration determination, and pharmacodynamic endpoint assessments were made during the study. Propofol and dexmedetomidine/placebo infusions were terminated when three endpoints (subjects were too sedated to hold a syringe, followed by loss of eyelash reflex, followed by loss of motor response to electrical stimulation) were achieved sequentially. The concentration of propofol associated with 50% probability of achieving a pharmacodynamic endpoint in the absence of dexmedetomidine (EC50; placebo treatment) was 6.63 microg/mL for motor response to electrical stimulation and ranged from 1.14 to 1.98 microg/mL for the ability to hold a syringe, eyelash reflex, and sedation scores. The apparent EC50 values of propofol (EC50APP; concentration of propofol at which the probability of achieving a pharmacodynamic endpoint is 50% in the presence of dexmedetomidine concentrations observed in the current study; dexmedetomidine treatment) were 0.273, 0.544-0.643, and 3.89 microg/mL for the ability to hold a syringe, sedation scores, and motor response, respectively. Dexmedetomidine reduced propofol concentrations required for sedation and suppression of motor response. Therefore, the propofol dose required for sedation and induction of anesthesia may have to be reduced in the presence of dexmedetomidine.

Duration of effect of lansoprazole on gastric pH and acid secretion in normal male volunteers.

AIM: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the duration of effect of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. on intragastric pH, acid secretion, gastrin levels, the potential for rebound acidity, and the relationship between gastric acid and drug pharmacokinetic parameters. METHODS: Sixteen subjects were treated with lansoprazole 30 mg daily or placebo for 14 days, followed by a 7-day post-dosing period and a post-study evaluation on day 28. Ambulatory 24-h pH was recorded and pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion measured. Plasma kinetics of lansoprazole were determined. RESULTS: Mean intragastric pH in the lansoprazole group increased significantly (P < 0.05) from baseline to day 14 compared to placebo. After cessation of treatment, secretory activity, as measured by intragastric pH, basal acid output and stimulated acid output, returned to baseline in 2 to 4 days without any overshoot, indicating the absence of acid rebound. Lansoprazole's terminal disposition half-life was 1.11 h. Mean pH and serum gastrin returned to baseline with half-lives of 22 and 19 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lansoprazole 30 mg daily significantly increases mean intragastric pH without producing acid rebound. Regeneration of acid production depends primarily on de novo synthesis of the acid pump.

Influence of cardiac output on dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics.

Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, reduces the requirements for anesthetic, analgesic, sedative, and hypnotic drugs. Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics were characterized in healthy subjects after intravenous administration by means of a computer-controlled infusion pump. A series of seven stepwise increasing pseudo-steady-state plasma concentrations were targeted. The influence of cardiac output on the pharmacokinetics was investigated by use of a compartmental modeling approach in which the elimination clearance was characterized as being either cardiac output independent or dependent. At dexmedetomidine concentrations of 0, 0.6, and 1.2 ng/mL, mean (SD) estimated cardiac outputs were 5. 6 (0.85), 5.1 (0.67), and 4.5 (0.83) L/min, and mean (SD) clearances were 40 (10), 38 (9.0), and 35 (8.5) L/h, respectively. Dexmedetomidine V(SS) and elimination half-life were 72 (19) L and 1. 9 (0.62) h, respectively. The approximately 3 to 19% decrease in cardiac output observed within the anticipated therapeutic range of 0.3 to 1.2 ng/mL was similar to that observed for clonidine. The decrease in cardiac output with increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine resulted in a corresponding decrease in drug elimination clearance of < or =12% within the therapeutic range; however, this decrease in dexmedetomidine clearance is likely not clinically relevant.

Lack of interaction between lansoprazole and propranolol, a pharmacokinetic and safety assessment.

Due to the prevalence of both gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases, it is likely that patients may be coprescribed gastric parietal cell proton pump inhibitors and beta-adrenergic antagonists. Therefore, the objectives of this phase I study were to assess the potential effects of the coadministration of lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of propranolol and to evaluate the safety of propranolol with concomitant lansoprazole dosing. In a double-blind fashion, 18 healthy male nonsmokers were initially randomized to receive either 60 mg oral lansoprazole, each morning for 7 days, or an identical placebo (period 1). On day 7, all subjects were concomitantly administered oral propranolol, 80 mg. After a minimum of 1 week following the last dose of either lansoprazole or placebo, subjects were crossed over to the opposite treatment for another 7 days (period 2). Subjects were again administered oral propranolol on day 7. During both treatment periods, blood samples for the determination of plasma propranolol and 4-hydroxy-propranolol were obtained just before the dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postdose. Plasma propranolol and 4-hydroxy-propranolol concentrations were determined by using HPLC with fluorescence detection. The Cmax, tmax, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 values for propranolol, as well as the AUC0-infinity for 4-hydroxy-propranolol, were calculated and compared between the lansoprazole and placebo regimens. The mean age of the 15 subjects who successfully completed the study was 31 years (range: 24-38 years), and their average weight was 174.8 pounds (range: 145-203 pounds). There were no statistically significant differences between the lansoprazole and placebo regimens for the propranolol Cmax, tmax, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 values. Also, there were no statistically significant differences between regimens for the 4-OH-propranolol AUC0-infinity. Safety evaluations, which included adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory determinations, ECG, and physical examinations, revealed no unexpected clinically significant findings and did not suggest a drug-drug interaction. In conclusion, lansoprazole does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of propranolol, suggesting that it does not interact with the CYP2D6- or CYP2C19-mediated metabolism of propranolol. Modification of a propranolol dosage regimen in the presence of lansoprazole is not indicated, based on the pharmacokinetic analysis and the lack of a clinically significant alteration in the pharmacodynamic response.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between lansoprazole and intravenously administered phenytoin.

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study was to investigate whether concomitant steady-state lansoprazole influences the pharmacokinetics of CYP2C9 substrates using single intravenously dosed phenytoin as a model substrate. In addition, the safety of concomitant administration of these two drugs was evaluated. Twelve healthy, nonsmoking, adult male subjects received 60 mg lansoprazole or placebo once daily for 9 days during each study period. On the morning of day 7, each subject received a single 250 mg intravenous phenytoin dose. There were no statistically significant differences between the two regimens for mean phenytoin Cmax or tmax. There was a minor (< 3%) but statistically significant difference between the two regimens for phenytoin AUC resulting from a very low intrasubject coefficient of variation (2.3%). The treatment and control mean plasma concentration phenytoin profiles were virtually super-imposable. In conclusion, concomitant multidose lansoprazole administration is unlikely to have any clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of CYP2C9 substrates in general or intravenous phenytoin specifically.

Averaging pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from experimental studies: statistical theory and application.

In most experimental pharmacokinetic studies, parameter estimates are computed separately for each subject, then averaged across subjects. Average estimators for ratios and functions of parameters are often of interest; examples include half-life and clearance. For these parameters, recommendations regarding averaging using the arithmetic versus the harmonic mean have been based on computer simulations.1-3 The goal in this paper was to demonstrate that these empirically generated results can be derived using approximations for the expected values of reciprocals and ratios. We first consider estimating the reciprocal of a parameter, and predict the earlier simulation results for half-life. We additionally predict results for clearance when computed as dose divided by area under the curve. Next we consider estimating the ratio of two parameters, and predict the earlier simulation results for clearance in a first-order exponential model. As a further example, we predict results for the mean residence time in noncompartmental analysis. These approximations provide a unifying approach that can be used to determine optimal summary estimators, without the need for extensive computer simulations.

Lansoprazole pharmacokinetics in subjects with various degrees of kidney function.

The pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole, a new benzimidazole proton pump inhibitor, was evaluated after multiple-dose oral administration to 20 subjects with various degrees of kidney function. Multiple blood samples were obtained after doses 1 and 7 of the once-daily seven-dose regimen, and plasma concentrations of lansoprazole and five metabolites were quantitated with use of HPLC. The free fraction of lansoprazole increased as kidney function declined. A significant, although weak, relationship existed between creatinine clearance (CLCR) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and terminal disposition half-life (t1/2), calculated with total concentration data. Those individuals with lower CLCR values also had lower total AUC and t1/2 values. However, there was no statistically significant relationship between CLCR and peak plasma concentration or AUC, calculated with unbound concentration data. No adjustment of lansoprazole dose is recommended on the basis of impaired kidney function.

The effects of oral doses of lansoprazole and omeprazole on gastric pH.

We compared gastric pH values after therapeutic doses of lansoprazole and omeprazole in 17 healthy adult men. The pharmacokinetics of the two drugs were studied. A three-way crossover design compared the effects on gastric pH of 15 and 30 mg lansoprazole and 20 mg omeprazole--each given once daily for 5 days. Ambulatory 24-h intragastric pH levels were measured before dosing, after the first and fifth doses in each period, and 15 days after each dosing period. A positive relationship between the lansoprazole or omeprazole area under the curve (AUCs) and the 24-h mean pH values was found for each regimen. No differences in maximum concentration (Cmax) and AUC were noted from day 1 to day 5 for the two lansoprazole doses. With omeprazole, both Cmax and AUC levels were greater on day 5 than on day 1. All three regimens increased 24-h mean gastric pH, although 30 mg lansoprazole had the most significant effect. The percentage of time that gastric pH was >3, >4, and >5 was also significantly higher with 30 mg lansoprazole. All three regimens were associated with reversible elevations of serum gastrin, which more than doubled at some points. No clinically significant adverse events were documented.

The comparative effects of lansoprazole, omeprazole, and ranitidine in suppressing gastric acid secretion.

The effects on 24-hour intragastric pH levels of once-daily doses of lansoprazole 15 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg were compared with the effects of omeprazole 20 mg QD and ranitidine 150 mg QID in a phase I, randomized, double-masked, four-way crossover study conducted in 29 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received each treatment regimen for 5 consecutive days with at least a 2-week washout between treatment periods. Ambulatory 24-hour intragastric pH values were monitored in each subject at baseline (2 days before crossover period 1) and again before dosing on day 5 of each of the four crossover treatment periods. Gastric pH values increased during all four regimens, with significantly higher mean 24-hour pH values noted in subjects receiving lansoprazole 30 mg QD (4.53 +/- 0.16) compared with those receiving lansoprazole 15 mg QD (3.97 +/- 0.16), omeprazole 20 mg QD (4.02 +/- 0.16), or ranitidine 150 mg QID (3.59 +/- 0.16). Lansoprazole 30 mg produced significantly greater mean percentages of time that the gastric pH was above 3.0 and 4.0 (75% and 63%, respectively) compared with the other treatment regimens. The mean percentages of time during which gastric pH was above 3.0 and 4.0, respectively, for the other treatments were lansoprazole 15 mg, 64% and 48%; omeprazole 20 mg, 63% and 51%; and ranitidine 150 mg, 52% and 38%. All treatment regimens were well tolerated, with no clinically significant differences between the regimens. Multiple-dose lansoprazole 30 mg QD produced a significantly increased intragastric pH level and significantly longer durations of increased intragastric pH level compared with lansoprazole 15 mg QD, omeprazole 20 mg QD, and ranitidine 150 mg QID.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction after administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole with prednisone.

In a recently reported case, administration of omeprazole, a "proton pump" inhibitor, was temporally associated with the clinical relapse of pemphigus in a 44-year-old woman whose condition had been stabilized with a fixed dose of prednisone, suggesting the possibility of a drug interaction. This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover study was conducted to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone after a single dose of prednisone given during multi-dose administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole. Lansoprazole (30 mg), omeprazole (40 mg), or placebo was administered once daily under fasted conditions for 7 days to healthy male volunteers. On the seventh day, a single dose of prednisone (40 mg) was administered concomitantly with the study medication, and plasma prednisolone concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography for 24 hours thereafter. Two weeks separated the first doses of each study period. Eighteen volunteers entered the study; pharmacokinetic data were evaluable for 15 participants. Safety data were evaluable for 16 participants in the lansoprazole/prednisone group; 17 in the omeprazole/ prednisone group; and 17 in the placebo/prednisone group. The pharmacokinetic parameters for prednisolone, including the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax), terminal-phase half-life (t1/2), and area under the concentration-time curve, were comparable for the three regimens. Adverse events (AEs) rated as possibly or probably drug related were reported by 50%, 24%, and 47% for subjects in the lansoprazole, omeprazole, and placebo treatment groups, respectively. Headache was the most common drug-related AE. No serious AEs were reported, and no subject withdrew from the study because of an AE. Concomitant administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole does not affect the absorption, biotransformation, or disposition of a single dose of prednisone. All three treatment regimens were well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between lansoprazole and theophylline.

The pharmacokinetic interaction potential of the new proton-pump inhibitor lansoprazole and theophylline was assessed in a double-blind, two-period (13-day duration per period), multiple-dose crossover study in 14 healthy male volunteers. Lansoprazole 60 mg or placebo once daily was coadministered with anhydrous theophylline 200 mg four times daily. Plasma theophylline concentrations were quantitated via high-performance liquid chromatography. Lansoprazole did not appear to affect substantially the absorption profile or clearance of theophylline. Theophylline area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve over the 6-h dosing interval decreased slightly (13%) but statistically significantly during lansoprazole coadministration. As the magnitude of this effect was small, this interaction is likely to be clinically insignificant.

Pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole in hemodialysis patients.

The pharmacokinetics of the new benzimidazole proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole and five of its metabolites were assessed after single oral dose administration to five hemodialysis patients. Patients were studied on dialysis and nondialysis days. Multiple blood and dialysate samples were collected after dosing and were assayed for lansoprazole and metabolite content via high-performance liquid chromatography. The degree of lansoprazole plasma protein binding was lower in hemodialysis patients than in subjects with normal renal function or patients with renal impairment not requiring dialytic therapy, although this tended to moderate when assessed immediately after dialysis. Examination of venous plasma concentration, paired arterial-venous concentration, and dialysate data revealed that lansoprazole and its metabolites were poorly dialyzable. No dosage adjustment of lansoprazole is necessary in hemodialysis patients nor is supplementation after hemodialysis sessions necessary.

Clinical sevoflurane metabolism and disposition. I. Sevoflurane and metabolite pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has low blood and tissue solubility and is metabolized to free fluoride and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). Although sevoflurane uptake and distribution and fluoride formation have been described, the pharmacokinetics of HFIP formation and elimination are incompletely understood. This investigation comprehensively characterized the simultaneous disposition of sevoflurane, fluoride, and HFIP. METHODS: Ten patients within 30% of ideal body weight who provided institutional review board-approved informed consent received sevoflurane (2.7% end-tidal, 1.3 MAC) in oxygen for 3 h after propofol induction, after which anesthesia was maintained with propofol, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide. Sevoflurane and unconjugated and total HFIP concentrations in blood were determined during anesthesia and for 8 h thereafter. Plasma and urine fluoride and total HFIP concentrations were measured during and through 96 h after anesthetic administration. Fluoride and HFIP were quantitated using an ion-selective electrode and by gas chromatography, respectively. RESULTS: The total sevoflurane dose, calculated from the pulmonary uptake rate, was 88.8 +/- 9.1 mmol. Sevoflurane was rapidly metabolized to the primary metabolites fluoride and HFIP, which were eliminated in urine. HFIP circulated in blood primarily as a glucuronide conjugate, with unconjugated HFIP < or = 15% of total HFIP concentrations. In blood, peak unconjugated HFIP concentrations were less than 1% of peak sevoflurane concentrations. Apparent renal fluoride and HFIP clearances (mean +/- SE) were 51.8 +/- 4.5 and 52.6 +/- 6.1 ml/min, and apparent elimination half-lives were 21.4 +/- 2.8 and 20.1 +/- 2.6 h, respectively. Renal HFIP and net fluoride excretion were 4,300 +/- 540 and 3,300 +/- 540 mumol. Compared with the estimated sevoflurane uptake, 4.9 +/- 0.5% of the dose taken up was eliminated in the urine as HFIP. For fluoride, 3.7 +/- 0.4% of the sevoflurane dose taken up was eliminated in the urine, which, because a portion of fluoride is sequestered in bone, corresponded to approximately 5.6% of the sevoflurane dose metabolized to fluoride. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane was rapidly metabolized to fluoride and HFIP, which was rapidly glucuronidated and eliminated in the urine. The overall extent of sevoflurane metabolism was approximately 5%.

Clinical sevoflurane metabolism and disposition. II. The role of cytochrome P450 2E1 in fluoride and hexafluoroisopropanol formation.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is metabolized to free fluoride and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). Cytochrome P450 2E1 is the major isoform responsible for sevoflurane metabolism by human liver microsomes in vitro. This investigation tested the hypothesis that P450 2E1 is predominantly responsible for sevoflurane metabolism in vivo. Disulfiram, which is converted in vivo to a selective inhibitor of P450 2E1, was used as a metabolic probe for P450 2E1. METHODS: Twenty-one patients within 30% of ideal body weight, who provided institutional review board-approved informed consent and were randomized to receive disulfiram (500 mg oral, n = 11) or nothing (control, n = 10) the night before surgery, were evaluated. All patients received sevoflurane (2.7% end-tidal, 1.3 MAC) in oxygen for 3 h after propofol induction. Thereafter, sevoflurane was discontinued, and anesthesia was maintained with propofol, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide. Blood sevoflurane concentrations during anesthesia and for 8 h thereafter were measured by gas chromatography. Plasma and urine fluoride and total (unconjugated plus glucuronidated) HFIP concentrations were measured by an ion-selective electrode and by gas chromatography, respectively, during anesthesia and for 96 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Patient groups were similar with respect to age, weight, sex, case duration, and intraoperative blood loss. The total sevoflurane dose, measured by cumulative end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations (3.7 +/- 0.1 MAC-h; mean +/- SE), total pulmonary uptake, and blood sevoflurane concentrations, was similar in both groups. In control patients, plasma fluoride and HFIP concentrations were increased compared to baseline values intraoperatively and postoperatively for the first 48 and 60 h, respectively. Disulfiram treatment significantly diminished this increase. Plasma fluoride concentrations increased from 2.1 +/- 0.3 microM (baseline) to 36.2 +/- 3.9 microM (peak) in control patients, but only from 1.7 +/- 0.2 to 17.0 +/- 1.6 microM in disulfiram-treated patients (P < 0.05 compared with control patients). Peak plasma HFIP concentrations were 39.8 +/- 2.6 and 14.4 +/- 1.1 microM in control and disulfiram-treated patients (P < 0.05), respectively. Areas under the plasma fluoride- and HFIP-time curves also were diminished significantly to 22% and 20% of control patients, respectively, by disulfiram treatment. Urinary excretion of fluoride and HFIP was similarly significantly diminished in disulfiram-treated patients. Cumulative 96-h fluoride and HFIP excretion in disulfiram-treated patient was 1,080 +/- 210 and 960 +/- 240 mumol, respectively, compared to 3,950 +/- 560 and 4,300 +/- 540 mumol in control patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Disulfiram, an effective P450 2E1 inhibitor, substantially decreased fluoride ion and HFIP production during and after sevoflurane anesthesia. These results suggest that P450 2E1 is a predominant P450 isoform responsible for human sevoflurane metabolism in vivo.

Determination of lansoprazole and five metabolites in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of lansoprazole, a new proton-pump inhibitor, and five of its metabolites in human plasma is described. Lansoprazole, its metabolites, and internal standard (omeprazole) were extracted into diethyl ether-methylene chloride and separation was obtained using a reversed-phase column under isocratic conditions. The method features monochromatic ultraviolet detection at 285 nm, and single extraction, single evaporation sample handling. The lower limit of quantitation, based on standards with acceptable coefficients of variation, was 10 ng/ml for all compounds. No endogenous compounds were found to interfere. This method has been demonstrated to be suitable for pharmacokinetic studies in humans.

Effect of phenytoin on the clinical pharmacokinetics of amiodarone.

Five healthy male volunteers were given oral amiodarone hydrochloride, 200 mg per day for 6 1/2 weeks, to determine its effects on the pharmacokinetics of both intravenous and oral phenytoin. Predose amiodarone and N-desethylamiodarone serum concentrations were obtained weekly during weeks 2-6. Amiodarone serum concentrations (ASC) increased during weeks 2-4 and then decreased sharply during weeks 5-6 when oral phenytoin, 2-4 mg/kg/day, was co-administered. In addition, N-desethylamiodarone serum concentrations (DEASC) exceeded corresponding ASC during weeks 5-6 whereas during weeks 2-4, DEASC were less than ASC. Because of the long elimination half-life for amiodarone previously reported in healthy volunteers after single doses of amiodarone and the frequent administration of amiodarone associated with this half-life, a modified equation for a continuous infusion was used to describe each subject's ASC versus time data. Pre-phenytoin ASC were fitted to an appropriate function to predict ASC during weeks 5-6 assuming no interaction. Observed versus predicted ASC were compared for weeks 5 and 6. Observed ASC during weeks 5 and 6 were (mean +/- SD) 0.25 +/- 0.09 micrograms/mL and 0.19 +/- 0.07 micrograms/mL, respectively. Corresponding predicted ASC were 0.36 +/- 0.12 micrograms/mL (P = .011) and 0.38 +/- 0.13 micrograms/mL (P = .004). These represented percent differences of 32.2 +/- 12.5% and 49.3 +/- 5.6% for weeks 5 and 6, respectively. Assuming there were no changes in the bioavailability of amiodarone during continuous administration, these findings strongly suggest induction of amiodarone metabolism by phenytoin. The clinical significance of this interaction remains to be determined.

DNA binding by antitumor anthracene derivatives.

The relative DNA binding strengths of bisantrene and nine new analogues were measured by spectrophotometric titration and melt transition temperature (Tm) techniques. Data from the spectrophotometric titrations could not be fit by simple Scatchard plots. However, they were fit by a McGhee-von Hippel equation over part of the binding range. The entire range of data was fit by a smoothing cubic spline function. The first derivative of this function gave, for each compound, a curve whose intercept provided a measure of relative binding strength. The delta Tm values agreed qualitatively with the spectrophotometric titration results, although there was not a precise linear relationship. Determinations of macroscopic pKas revealed that most of the compounds were dications at pH 7.0, but a few were mixtures of monocations and dications. No correlation was found between these binding studies and antitumor potencies in a clonogenic assay, which suggests that factors other than DNA binding can determine cytotoxicity for some of the analogues.

Effects of passive smoking on theophylline clearance.

Theophylline disposition was examined in seven passive smokers, defined as nonsmokers with long-term exposure to cigarette smoke, and seven age-matched nonsmokers with minimal smoke exposure. Subjects were given an intravenous infusion of aminophylline (6 mg/kg) and blood samples were drawn before and during the 48-hour postinfusion period. Clearance for passive smokers was 6.01 x 10(-2) L/hr.kg and for nonsmokers, clearance was 4.09 x 10(-2) L/hr.kg (p less than 0.025). Terminal elimination half-life for passive smokers was 6.93 hours versus 8.69 hours for nonsmokers (p less than 0.05). The mean residence time for passive smokers was 9.89 hours. For nonsmokers, the mean residence time was 13.11 hours (p less than 0.05). These measurements were statistically different, whereas there was no difference in volume of distribution between the groups, suggesting that passive smokers metabolize theophylline more rapidly than nonsmokers. Plasma and urine cotinine and nicotine concentrations were measured in all subjects. There was a significant difference between the subject groups in plasma (p less than 0.004) and urine (p less than 0.002) cotinine concentrations. Theophylline clearance correlated with both plasma (r = 0.73, p less than 0.01) and urine (r = 0.79, p less than 0.01) cotinine concentrations. Additional studies should be conducted to further define the pharmacokinetic characteristics of passive smokers and to assess the effects of passive smoking on drugs metabolized by the mixed function oxidase system.