Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment in Multiple Settings: Evaluation of a National Initiative.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the implementation and outcomes of a multisite initiative to identify and intervene in adolescent substance use across the many settings where youth interact. This paper focuses on the implementation and intermediate outcomes of the initiative, while others in the supplement address impact and ultimate outcomes. METHODS: A mixed-methods cross-grantee evaluation was conducted from 2014 to 2019 among 56 recipients of funding from the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation to implement screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) across more than 1,266 youth-facing settings. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from grantees on a quarterly basis, as well as from grantee proposals, progress reports, monthly grantee monitoring calls, and survey findings. RESULTS: Grantees reported increased capacity to provide SBIRT to youth across various settings: pediatric and primary care practices, community behavioral health organizations, juvenile justice programs, schools, and community-based organizations. Collectively, grantees screened 141,230 youth for substance use, 12,272 received a brief intervention, and 2,212 were referred to treatment. As part of the initiative, grantees provided SBIRT training to over 37,000 nursing and social work students, medical residents, addiction medicine fellows, and others. Implementation challenges included fitting screening into the workflow of primary care settings, confidentiality and consent in schools, reimbursement, and lack of specialist providers to refer to for substance use disorder treatment. Intermediate outcomes collected include total numbers of youth screened, received a brief intervention, and/or referred to more intensive treatment based on their screening scores. CONCLUSIONS: Research on SBIRT in adolescents has been limited to date despite positive outcomes reported in adults. This mixed-methods evaluation of an initiative to expand SBIRT implementation demonstrates feasibility of expanding access to substance use screening and intervention for youth across multiple settings and identifies challenges of implementation that differ somewhat based on settings.

Substance use and firearm access among college freshmen.

OBJECTIVE: Examine the proportion of students with rapid firearm access and associations with recent alcohol and marijuana use. PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional data from college freshmen (n = 183) in 2020 who participated in the Mason: Health Starts Here study. METHODS: Using logistic regression, associations were examined between past 30-day substance use and access to firearms within 15-min. RESULTS: More than 10% of students could rapidly access a firearm, 53% of whom were current binge drinkers, compared to 13% of those who could not rapidly access firearms. Non-Hispanic White students (AOR = 4.1, 95%CI = 1.3,12.7) and past 30-day binge drinkers (AOR = 6.4, 95%CI = 2.1,19.7) had greater odds of having rapid firearm access. Age, sex, and past 30-day marijuana use were not associated with rapid access. CONCLUSIONS: A notable proportion of students had rapid firearm access, which was strongly associated with recent binge drinking. Campus prevention programs should consider how their alcohol and firearm policies could be enhanced to prevent violence/self-harm.

Demographic Variation in Military Life Stress and Perceived Support Among Military Spouses.

INTRODUCTION: Military spouses play a critical role in supporting military service members, and thus, their experiences may have a significant impact on the well-being, readiness, and resilience of the U.S. Armed Forces. Research suggests that military spouses experience unique stressors as a result of military life, but few studies have assessed demographic factors associated with their experiences of military life and perceived support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the Millennium Cohort Family Study, a nationwide survey of 9,872 married spouses of service members with 2 to 5 years of military service, this study examined differences in experiences of military life and perceived support across multiple understudied subgroups of military spouses. Key outcomes included military-related stressors (e.g., deployment-related experiences), perceived social support, and perceived military efforts to provide support. RESULTS: Military life stress and perceived support differed across military spouse, service member, and family characteristics. Results indicated that spouses who are older than age 35 or are married to enlisted service members in the Army, Navy, or Marines are more likely to experience heightened military stress or less perceived social support. Dual-military couples reported experiencing less stress associated with military life and perceiving more social support and support from the military, compared with spouses who have never served in the military. CONCLUSION: These findings may help guide effective channeling of resources and outreach to potentially vulnerable military families.