Head progression distance during the first stage of labor as a predictor for delivery outcome.

Objectives: To assess if measurement of the head progression distance (PD) during the first stage of labor in nulliparous women can predict the delivery method.Methods: A prospective study was conducted on consecutive nulliparous women beyond 37 week's gestation during the first stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound was performed to assess the PD. Analysis was performed on the relationships between PD during rest and during voluntary pushing and the fetal and maternal characteristics, delivery mode, and immediate postnatal outcomes.Results: Eighty seven suitable nulliparous women were suitable for analysis. PD was found to be significantly longer in women who delivered vaginally (VD) compared to those who underwent a cesarean section (CS) for obstructed labor: PD at rest was 2.51 ± 1.71 cm in women who delivered vaginally compared to 1.48 ± 1.9 cm in women who delivered by CS (p = .01). The PD during pushing was 3.43 ± 1.8 cm for a VD compared to 1.5 ± 2.1 cm for CS (p = .015). Logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated a moderate predictive value of PD with respect to the mode of delivery (area under the curve was 0.67 during both resting and pushing period).Conclusion: PD measurements during the first stage of labor among nulliparous women differ significantly both in rest and during pushing between patients who delivered vaginally compared to CS and can therefore assist in predicting the mode of delivery.

What Do Obstetricians Really Think about Ultrasound in the Delivery Room?

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the role of intrapartum sonography has expanded in childbirth management, in subjective clinical situations such as arrested deliveries, or prior to instrumental deliveries. OBJECTIVES: To assess the current use of intrapartum ultrasound by obstetricians in Israel. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was completed by 79 obstetricians in second- and third level- hospitals in Israel. The results were analyzed according to main subspecialty (sonography, delivery), experience and gender. RESULTS: A questionnaire was completed by 56 senior obstetricians and 23 interns with an average experience of 14.3 and 2.4 years, respectively. All obstetricians performed ultrasound examinations in the delivery room for basic indications such as fetal presentation during twin delivery and to rule out placenta previa. Sonographers consistently reported advanced indications as compared to senior members of delivery teams and interns in the assessment of prolonged first (52% vs. 14% vs. 14%) and second stage of labor (88% vs. 52% vs. 62%) and in assessment of fetal head station (60% vs. 30% vs. 22%), head progression during descent (48% vs. 23% vs. 11%), diagnosis of head position (88% vs. 68% vs. 60%), spine direction (92% vs. 59% vs. 53%) and asynclytism (41% vs. 20% vs. 29%). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is currently used by all physicians in the delivery room for basic indications. However, obstetric teams report a low use of advanced intrapartum ultrasound and prefer to rely on their clinical experience. Advanced intrapartum sonographic imaging should be an integral part of obstetric qualifications. A steep learning curve, along with high reproducibility, suggests that ultrasound devices will become a common tool in labor and delivery management.