ABSTRACT
Aim: Single-tooth implant restorations, whether screw-retained or cement-retained, are essential for prosthodontic rehabilitation despite having low design flexibility, cosmetic appeal, and high 5-year survival rates. Materials and Methods: A study involving 14 patients with missing mandibular first molars used 28 implants and cement-retained and screw-retained prostheses. Patients had a single edentulous gap, adequate dental hygiene, and sufficient bone volume at the implant site. The study adhered to the Helsinki Declaration, followed WHO 2007 safety guidelines, and evaluated soft tissue, bone height, and bone loss. Data analysis included the Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: In patients between the ages of 17 and 46, single-implant restorations were compared with cement- and screw-retained at 6 months. Abutment screw loosening and peri-implant soft-tissue traits did not differ significantly from one another. Conclusion: The study compared screw- and cement-retained implant restorations in 28 single-tooth implant-supported prostheses over a 6-month functional loading period, finding no significant improvement in either approach.
ABSTRACT
Aim: The study's objective was to assess the dimensional accuracy of hybrid polyether and polyvinyl siloxane materials for implant impressions. Materials and Methods: Nine groups were created from 45 samples of various building materials and construction techniques from the study. Five samples were tested, and 45 impressions were recorded. Results: The hybrid non-splinted technique has improved implant site replication, accuracy, and low interimplant distance alterations. Conclusion: The finest possible reproduction of implant sites on the master cast was made feasible by the use of an open, non-splinted method and a hybrid polyvinyl siloxane-polyether impression material.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare prevalence and type of complications associated with metal resin fixed complete dentures based on implant distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included data collected for a period of 12 years for patients treated with maxillary and mandibular implant-supported fixed complete dentures at Loma Linda University School of Dentistry. In total, 223 patient's charts were reviewed which included 100 maxillary and 123 mandibular fixed complete dentures. Implant distribution and prevalence of complications associated with each implant-supported fixed complete denture were documented. Tooth delamination, the most common complication associated with fixed complete dentures, was compared between 2 implant distribution groups in each arch. Covariates including age, sex, opposing arch, cantilever occluding units, and number of implants were evaluated to determine their association with tooth delamination. Data and hypotheses were statistically analyzed using descriptive statistics along with logistic regression model. All tests of hypotheses were considered statistically significant at an alpha level of 0.05. RESULTS: In the maxillary arch, some effect of the prevalence of tooth delamination was seen for the group that had implants placed posterior to canine eminence but it was not statistically significant. Denture tooth delamination had the highest prevalence among complications irrespective of implant distribution. Significant denture tooth delamination was seen for patients with opposing fixed complete dentures in comparison to patients with removable opposing arch prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Implant distribution is not a significant factor related to metal resin fixed complete dentures. Opposing fixed complete dentures have a significantly higher association with denture tooth delamination.
