Sustained coronary patency after fibrinolytic therapy as independent predictor of 10-year cardiac survival Observations from the Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion in COronary Thrombolysis (APRICOT) trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether late coronary patency after myocardial infarction has prognostic impact independent of left ventricular function remains a matter of debate. Reocclusion rates in the first year after fibrinolysis vary between 20% and 30%. Of all reocclusions, about 30% present as clinical reinfarction, associated with a 2-fold-increased risk of mortality. The clinical impact of reocclusion that presents without reinfarction has not been studied; but an association has been demonstrated with impaired contractile recovery of left ventricular function, the strongest prognosticator of long-term outcome. We therefore studied the impact of 3-month coronary patency after successful fibrinolysis on 10-year cardiac survival. METHODS: In the APRICOT-1 trial, 248 ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with an open infarct artery 24 hours after fibrinolysis had 3-month repeated angiography. Ten-year clinical follow-up was complete in 99.6%. RESULTS: The reocclusion rate was 29% (71/248). Of these reocclusions, 24% presented as clinical reinfarction (17/71). Cardiac survival at 10 years was 73% in patients with a reoccluded infarct artery and 88% in patients with sustained patency (P < .01). This difference was also present in patients in whom reocclusion was only detected as a result of systematic repeated angiography, that is, in the absence of reinfarction or ischemic symptoms between angiograms (70% vs 86%, P < .03). Multivariable analysis identified sustained patency at 3-month angiography as independent predictor of 10-year cardiac survival (hazard ratio 2.10, 95% CI 1.10-4.02) together with left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained infarct artery patency in the first 3 months after successful fibrinolysis is a strong predictor of 10-year cardiac survival, independent of left ventricular function. Notably, this also holds true when reocclusion occurs without signs of clinical reinfarction or recurrent ischemia. Therefore, future preventive strategies should also focus on "clinically silent" reocclusions. Additional studies on better antithrombotic regimens and the combination with a routine invasive strategy early after successful fibrinolysis are warranted.

High-grade infarct-related stenosis after successful thrombolysis: strong predictor of reocclusion, but not of clinical reinfarction.

BACKGROUND: After successful thrombolysis, a high-grade stenosis at 24-hour angiography is strongly predictive of reocclusion and is often believed to result in high reinfarction rates. However, routine angioplasty did not reduce death or reinfarction in past trials. Systematic angiographic follow-up shows that reocclusion often occurs without clinical reinfarction. This study investigates whether the increased risk for reocclusion associated with a high-grade lesion translates into impaired clinical outcome. METHODS: In the ischemia-guided Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion in COronary Thrombolysis (APRICOT-1) trial, 240 patients with ST-elevation MI who had an open infarct artery 24 hours after thrombolysis had 3-month repeat angiography to assess reocclusion, with clinical follow-up at 3 months and 3 years. RESULTS: On the basis of the optimal discriminative stenosis severity, the reocclusion rate was 40% (47/118) in patients with a high-grade residual stenosis and 16% (20/122) in patients with a low-medium-grade lesion (risk ratio [RR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.54-3.84; P <.01). Three-month death and reinfarction rates did not differ: 6% (7/118) versus 9% (11/122; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.26-1.64; P = not significant). Systematic angiographic follow-up revealed that reocclusion of a high-grade lesion occurred in the absence of clinical reinfarction in 85% (40/47) of patients, as compared with 45% (9/20) in patients with a low-medium-grade stenosis (RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.15-3.12; P <.01). Despite an independent association with reocclusion, a high-grade stenosis was not predictive of either short- or long-term death and reinfarction. CONCLUSIONS: After successful thrombolysis and adopting an ischemia-guided revascularization strategy, patients with a high-grade stenosis experience death/reinfarction rates similar to that of patients with a low-medium-grade lesion. This is true despite a 2- to 3-fold higher risk for reocclusion. The finding that reocclusion of a high-grade lesion often occurs without clinical reinfarction explains the absence of a relationship between a severe stenosis and death/reinfarction. Appreciation of these observations may contribute to an optimal design of a future randomized trial to re-evaluate the impact of a routine invasive strategy.