Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Children (Basel) ; 10(5)2023 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37238333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Being aware of possible gait impairments in Ponseti-treated clubfoot children might be useful for optimizing initial and additional treatment. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify kinematic gait abnormalities in children with clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method (with and without relapse). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted. Studies comparing kinematic gait parameters of Ponseti-treated clubfoot children to healthy controls were included. Meta-analyses and qualitative analyses were conducted on the extracted data. RESULTS: Twenty studies were identified. Twelve of the 153 reported kinematic outcome measures could be included in the meta-analysis. Plantarflexion at push-off, maximum ankle dorsiflexion during the swing, maximal plantarflexion, and ankle range of motion was significantly lower in Ponseti-treated clubfoot children. Ponseti-treated clubfoot children showed more internal foot progression. Qualitative analysis revealed 51 parameters in which pre-treatment relapse clubfeet deviated from healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Ponseti-treated clubfoot children showed several kinematic gait differences from healthy controls. In future studies, homogeneity in measured variables and study population and implementation of multi-segmental foot models will aid in comparing studies and understanding clubfoot complexity and treatment outcomes. The question remains as to what functional problems gait impairments lead to and whether additional treatment could address these problems.

2.
Foot (Edinb) ; 45: 101744, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33010590

ABSTRACT

Forefoot offloading shoes are used to reduce pressure on specific regions of the foot. Aim of the pressure reduction is to aid healing of the soft and bony tissues and prevent complications by treating foot disorders. A great variety of forefoot offloading shoes are available. In a first step to investigate the appropriate use of these footwear in orthopedic settings, we studied plantar pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of three forefoot offloading shoes namely the Mailand, OrthoWedge and Podalux in a healthy population. Twenty subjects walked in a randomized order wearing three forefoot offloading shoes and a reference shoe for six minutes. The Pedar system was used to measure the pressure in 7 regions. Peak pressure and pressure time integral were analyzed as measures of pressure distribution. Furthermore, wearing characteristics were addressed using a Numeric Rating Scale. Pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of the forefoot offloading shoes were compared to a reference shoe. The Mailand and OrthoWedge shoes significantly reduced peak pressure with more than 80% under the hallux and more than 45% under MTH1 (p<.001). The Podalux did not show significant peak pressure reduction under the forefoot compared to the reference shoe. Under the lesser toes, the MTH4-5 region and heel region the Podalux shoe showed even a significant increase in peak pressure (p=.001). Looking at wearing characteristics, the Podalux and reference shoe scored significantly better than the other two forefoot offloading shoes (p<.01). In this study the differences between different forefoot offloading shoes was assessed. The Mailand and OrthoWedge shoes gave the best pressure reduction in the forefoot but are less comfortable in use. The Podalux rocker shoe showed opposite results. Next step is a patient study to compare our results in a patient population.


Subject(s)
Forefoot, Human/physiology , Shoes , Walking/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Adult , Equipment Design , Female , Heel/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reference Values
3.
Gait Posture ; 66: 94-100, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30170140

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Currently, the Ponseti method is the gold standard for treatment of clubfeet. For long-term functional evaluation of this method, gait analysis can be performed. Previous studies have assessed gait differences between Ponseti treated clubfeet and healthy controls. RESEARCH QUESTION/PURPOSE: The aims of this systematic review were to compare the gait kinetics of Ponseti treated clubfeet with healthy controls and to compare the gait kinetics between clubfoot patients treated with the Ponseti method or surgically. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Cinahl ebsco, and Google scholar, for studies reporting on gait kinetics in children with clubfeet treated with the Ponseti method. Studies were excluded if they only used EMG or pedobarography. Data were extracted and a risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analyses and qualitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Nine studies were included, of which five were included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analyses showed that ankle plantarflexor moment (95% CI -0.25 to -0.19) and ankle power (95% CI -0.89 to -0.60, were significantly lower in the Ponseti treated clubfeet compared to the healthy controls. No significant difference was found in ankle dorsiflexor and plantarflexor moment, and ankle power between clubfeet treated with surgery compared to the Ponseti method. SIGNIFICANCE: Differences in gait kinetics are present when comparing Ponseti treated clubfeet with healthy controls. However, there is no significant difference between surgically and Ponseti treated clubfeet. These results give more insight in the possibilities of improving the gait pattern of patients treated for clubfeet.


Subject(s)
Casts, Surgical , Clubfoot/therapy , Gait/physiology , Child , Clubfoot/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Manipulation, Orthopedic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 3(4): 931-43, 2009 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20144343

ABSTRACT

The objective of this review is to identify and review publications describing the impact of reduced somatosensation on balance. Based on knowledge of the association between specific somatosensory loss and deterioration of balance, conclusions can be made about role of somatosensation in standing balance. A systematic literature review is presented in which publications from the years 1993 through 2007 were searched in Medline and Embase. Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms and free text words (related to balance, somatosensory loss, and lower limb) were used to perform the searches. Fifteen articles were selected for detailed review based on predetermined inclusion criteria, and three of the included articles described the effect of experimentally reduced somatosensation on balance in healthy subjects. Ten of the articles described balance in diabetic neuropathy (DN). The last two included articles described balance in Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease type 1A (CMT1A) or type 2 (CMT2). The literature indicates that the tactile sensation is reduced in DN, CMT1A, and CMT2 and when the plantar surface of the feet was hypothermically anesthetized. Joint motion sensation seems to be impaired in patients with DN, and passive joint position sensation appears to be reduced in healthy subjects with anesthesia of ankle and foot from prolonged ischemia. This reduced somatosensation seems to have a negative effect on balance in patients with DN and CMT2; however, this appeared not to be the case in patients with CMT1A and in healthy subjects.


Subject(s)
Postural Balance/physiology , Proprioception/physiology , Somatosensory Disorders/physiopathology , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...