Rectus Abdominis Muscle Atrophy and Asymmetry After Pulmonary Lobectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary lobectomy can result in intercostal nerve injury, leading to denervation of the rectus abdominis (RA) resulting in asymmetric muscle atrophy or an abdominal bulge. While there is a high rate of intercostal nerve injury during thoracic surgery, there are no studies that evaluate the magnitude and predisposing factors for RA atrophy in a large cohort. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 357 patients who underwent open, thoracoscopic or robotic pulmonary lobectomy at a single academic center. RA volumes were measured on computed tomography scans preoperatively and postoperatively on both the operated and nonoperated sides from the level of the xiphoid process to the thoracolumbar junction. RA volume change and association of surgical/demographic characteristics was assessed. RESULTS: Median RA volume decreased bilaterally after operation, decreasing significantly more on the operated side (-19.5%) versus the nonoperated side (-6.6%) (P < 0.0001). 80.4% of the analyzed cohort experienced a 10% or greater decrease from preoperative RA volume on the operated side. Overweight individuals (body mass index 25.5-29.9) experienced a 1.7-fold greater volume loss on the operated side compared to normal weight individuals (body mass index 18.5-24.9) (P = 0.00016). In all right-sided lobectomies, lower lobe resection had the highest postoperative volume loss (Median (interquartile range): -28 (-35, -15)) (P = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS: This study of postlobectomy RA asymmetry includes the largest cohort to date; previous literature only includes case reports. Lobectomy operations result in asymmetric RA atrophy and predisposing factors include demographics and surgical approach. Clinical and quality of life outcomes of RA atrophy, along with mitigation strategies, must be assessed.

Moderate and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease Predict Greater 5-Year Mortality following Major Lower-Extremity Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) predicts greater mortality after major lower-extremity amputation (LEA), but it remains poorly understood whether patients with earlier stages of CKD share similar risk. METHODS: We assessed long-term postoperative outcomes for patients with CKD in a retrospective chart review of 565 patients who underwent atraumatic major LEA at a large tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. We stratified patients by renal function and compared outcomes including survival. RESULTS: Preoperative CKD diagnosis was related to many patient characteristics, co-occurred with many comorbidities, and was associated with less follow-up and survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression analyses showed significantly worse 5-year survival for major LEA patients with mild, moderate, or severe CKD compared to major LEA patients with no history of CKD at the time of amputation (P < 0.001). Severe CKD independently predicted worse mortality at 1-year (odds ratio [OR] 2.91; P = 0.003) and 5-years (OR 3.08; P < 0.001). Moderate CKD independently predicted worse 5-year mortality (OR 2.66; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that moderate and severe CKD predict greater long-term mortality following major LEA when controlling for numerous potential confounders. This finding raises questions about the underlying mechanism if causal and highlights an opportunity to improve outcomes with earlier recognition and optimization CKD preoperatively.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Postoperative Outcomes of Osteocutaneous Fibula Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Osteocutaneous fibula free flaps (FFFs) are a fundamental component of reconstructive surgery in the head and neck region, particularly after traumatic injuries or oncologic resections. Despite their utility, FFFs are associated with various postoperative complications, such as infection, flap failure, and donor site morbidity, impacting up to 54% of cases. This study aimed to investigate the influence of socioeconomic variables, with a particular focus on median household income (MHI), on the incidence of postoperative complications in FFF reconstruction for head and neck cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 80 patients who underwent FFF reconstruction for head and neck cancer at a single center from 2016 to 2022 was conducted. Demographic and patient characteristics, including race, MHI, insurance type, history of radiation therapy, and TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) cancer stage, were evaluated. Logistic regression, controlling for comorbidities, was used to assess the impact of MHI on 30-, 90-, and 180-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: The patient population was predominantly male (n = 51, 63.8%) and White (n = 63, 78.8%), with the majority falling within the $55,000 to $100,000 range of MHI (n = 51, 63.8%). Nearly half of the patients had received neoadjuvant radiation treatment (n = 39, 48.75%), and 36.25% (n = 29) presented with osteoradionecrosis. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the $55,000-$100,000 MHI group had significantly lower odds of developing complications in the 0- to 30-day postoperative period when compared with those in the <$55,000 group (odds ratio [OR], 0.440; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.205-0.943; P = 0.035). This trend persisted in the 31- to 90-day period (OR, 0.136; 95% CI, 0.050-0.368; P < 0.001) and was also observed in the likelihood of flap takeback. In addition, the $100,000-$150,000 group had significantly lower odds of developing complications in the 31- to 90-day period (OR, 0.182; 95% CI, 0.035-0.940; P = 0.042). No significant difference was found in the >$150,000 group. CONCLUSIONS: Median household income is a significant determinant and potentially a more influential factor than neoadjuvant radiation in predicting postoperative complications after FFF reconstruction. Disparities in postoperative outcomes based on income highlight the need for substantial health care policy shifts and the development of targeted support strategies for patients with lower MHI.

Preoperative Nil Per Os Duration Predicts Mortality and Ambulation Following Below-Knee Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Routine use of nil per os (NPO) prior to procedures has been associated with dehydration and malnutrition leading to patient discomfort. We aim to examine how duration of NPO status affects postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective below-knee amputation (BKA). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 92 patients who underwent elective BKA between 2014-2022 for noninfectious indications. We performed statistical analysis using Chi-square tests, t-tests, and linear/logistic regression with odds ratio using P < .05 as our significance level. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.0 ± 16.7 years, and there were 64 (70%) male patients and 41 (45%) Black patients. Mean NPO duration was 12.9 ± 4.7 hours. Patients with longer NPO duration were associated with increased rates of postoperative stroke (P = .03). Patients with shorter NPO duration had significantly lower mean BUN on postoperative day (POD) 1 (14.5, P < .001) and POD 3 (14.1, P < .001) compared to preoperative mean BUN (16.8), however this normalized by POD 7 (19.2, P = .26). There were no changes in postoperative renal function based on baseline kidney disease status or associated with longer NPO duration. Shorter NPO duration was a predictor of increased likelihood of 1-year follow-up (OR: 2.9 [1.24-6.79], P = .01), independent ambulation (OR: 2.7 [1.03-7.34], P = .04), and decreased mortality (OR: .11 [.013-.91], P = .04). CONCLUSION: While NPO duration does not appear to result in postoperative renal dysfunction, prolonged NPO duration predicts worse rates of follow-up, ambulation, and survival and is associated with increased stroke rates.

Delayed Closure of Guillotine Lower Extremity Amputation in Obese Patients is Associated with Increased Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Staged surgery with open guillotine amputation (OGA) prior to a definitive major lower extremity amputation (LEA) has been shown to be effective for sepsis control and improving wound healing. Studies have evaluated postoperative complications including infection, return to the operating room for re-amputation, and amputation failure following OGA. However, the role of timing to close OGA for predictive outcomes remains poorly understood. We aim to assess outcomes of major LEA related to the time of OGA closure. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent major LEA from 2015 to 2021 were collected retrospectively. The study included all patients undergoing below-knee, through-knee, or above-knee amputations. Next, patients who had OGA prior to a definitive amputation were selected. Patients who died before amputation closure were excluded. Postamputation outcomes such as surgical site infection, postoperative sepsis, postoperative ambulation, hospital length of stay, and 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality were reviewed. The study cohort was stratified by demographics and comorbidities. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the time of closure (TOC) cutoff value. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to assess outcomes. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 688 patients who underwent major LEA, 322 underwent staged amputation with OGA before the formalization procedure and were included. The TOC ranged from 1-47 days with a median of 4 days (interquartile range from 3 to 7). The optimal TOC point of 8 days (ranging from 2-42 days) in obese patients (199/322) for predicting mortality showed the largest area under the curve (0.709) with 64.71% sensitivity and 78.3% specificity. Patients who are obese and grouped in TOC less than 8 days had no 30-day mortality, significantly lower 1-year mortality, better survival, and a lower rate of deep venous thrombosis complication. There was no significant difference in length of stay, postoperative surgical site infection, sepsis, and ambulation between the 2 subgroups of obese patients. Multivariable analysis showed that gender, chronic kidney disease, and postoperative ambulation independently predict overall mortality in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: TOC cutoff in obese patients showed statistically significant results in predicting mortality. Our findings indicated better survival in obese patients with a lower TOC (less than 8 days). This emphasizes the importance of earlier closure of OGA in obese patients.

Opioid Use Disorder in Patients Undergoing Major Lower Extremity Amputation: Prevalence and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with a history of Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) have higher postoperative complication rates and mortality in many settings. Yet, it remains poorly understood how the opioid epidemic has affected patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation (LEA) and whether outcomes differ by OUD status. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all 689 patients who underwent major LEA at a large tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. This study assessed patient characteristics and long-term postoperative outcomes for patients with preoperative OUD. RESULTS: 133 (19.3%) patients had a lifetime history of preoperative OUD. Preoperative OUD was associated with key characteristics, comorbidities, and outcome measures. OUD was significantly associated with younger age (P < .001), black race (P = .026), single relationship status (P < .001), BMI <30 (P = .024), no primary care provider (P = .004), and Medicaid insurance (P < .001). Comorbidities significantly associated with OUD include current smoking (P < .001), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV; P = .003), and history of osteomyelitis (P < .001). Preoperative OUD independently predicted lower rates of 30-60-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] .54, P = .018) and 1-12-month reamputation (OR .41, P = .006). There was no significant difference in long-term mortality and follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the prevalence of OUD in patients undergoing major LEA and reports associations and long-term outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of recognizing OUD and raise questions about the mechanisms underlying its relation to rates of postoperative readmission and reamputation.

Modified Frailty Index Helps Predict Mortality and Ambulation Differences Between Genders and Racial Differences Following Major Lower Extremity Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Major lower extremity amputation (LEA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been used to predict outcomes including ambulation and mortality after LEA. It remains unknown for which patient demographics the mFI-5 is a reliable predictor. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a first-time major LEA at our institution from 2015 to 2022. Patients were stratified into 2 risk groups based on their mFI-5 score: non-frail (mFI<3) and frail (mFI≥3) and assessed on outcomes. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of 687 patients of whom 134 (19.6%) were considered frail and 551 (80.4%) were considered non-frail. A higher mFI-5 is associated with decreased ambulation rates (OR: 0.565, P = .004), increased hospital readmission (OR: 1.657, P = .021), and increased mortality (OR: 2.101, P = .001) following major LEA. In African American patients, frail and non-frail patients differed on readmission at 90 days (P = .008), mortality at 1 year (P = .001), ambulatory status (P < .001), and prosthesis use (P = .023). In male patients, frail and non-frail patients differed on readmission at 90 days (P = .019), death at 1 year (P = .001), and ambulatory status (P = .002). In Caucasian patients and female patients, frail and non-frail patients did not differ significantly on outcomes. DISCUSSION: The mFI-5 is a valuable predictor of outcomes following major LEA, specifically in males and African American patients. Moreover, surgeons should consider using frailty status to risk stratify patients and inform treatment plans.

A 10-Year Retrospective Review on the Use of Prophylactic Spinal Reconstruction in Spinal Surgery Involving High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: Spinal surgeries are being offered to a broader patient population who are both medically and surgically complex. History of prior spinal surgery, advanced age, and presence of comorbidities, such as obesity, malnutrition, steroid use, and tobacco use, are risk factors for postoperative complications. Prophylactic spinal reconstruction at the time of spinal surgery has been shown to have improved outcomes and decreased wound complications; however, outcomes focusing specifically on complex patients with a history of previous spinal surgery (or surgeries) have not been well described. METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed at the University of Maryland Medical Center (Baltimore, MD) of high-risk patients who underwent complex spinal surgery with prophylactic spinal reconstruction from 2011 to 2022. One hundred forty-three consecutive surgeries from 136 patients were included in the study. Patients younger than 17 years or who had an incomplete medical record were excluded. RESULTS: Most patients were female (63.6%) versus male (31.5%). The average American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3. All but 6 patients (11%) had a history of at least 1 spinal surgery, with nearly half of patients having had between 2 and 5 spinal surgeries. Reconstruction was performed with paraspinous flaps in most cases (n = 133 [93%]). The overall complication rate was 10.5%, with surgical site infection being the most common complication. Seventeen patients (12.5%) underwent reoperation within 90 days of initial surgery. Average length of follow-up was 4.18 months (range, 0.03-40.53 months). CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients, prophylactic spinal reconstruction offers improved outcomes with decreased wound complications compared with salvage. For large defects, paraspinous flaps are recommended over other reconstructive options. Prolonged drain placement is felt to be protective against complications.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Mortality for COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been studied as an indicator of systemic inflammation and as a prognostic tool in multiple areas of medicine. Previous research has suggested that higher NLR and rapid increase to peak NLR are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), particularly in those experiencing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Within vascular surgery, there is data to suggest a positive correlation between elevated pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) NLR and higher rates of mortality following major procedures. This study explores the prognostic value of peri-ECMO NLR in patients requiring veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) therapy for COVID-19-related ARDS. The objective of this study was to explore the utility of pre-ECMO NLR as an easily accessible prognostic factor for patients suffering from COVID-19-associated ARDS that require VV-ECMO. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study within a tertiary care hospital conducted between April 2020 and January 2021. Patients requiring VV-ECMO therapy for COVID-19-associated ARDS were included. Peri-ECMO NLR values, length of stay (LOS), duration on VV-ECMO, and discharge status were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Youden's J statistics were performed to calculate a cut-off value of 11.005 for pre-ECMO NLR and 17.616 for on-ECMO NLR. Pre-ECMO and on-ECMO Kaplan-Meyer curves were generated for two groups of patients, those above and below NLR cutoff thresholds. Two-sample T-test was performed to test for significant differences in LOS and duration on VV-ECMO. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in the study for final analyses. There was an overall mortality of 39% (n = 10). ROC curve analysis and Youden's J statistic revealed an optimal cut-off value of pre-ECMO NLR = 11.005 and on-ECMO NLR = 17.616. Results showed that the patient group placed on VV-ECMO with a pre-ECMO NLR less than 11.005 experienced no mortality (n = 7) and a median LOS of 28 days (IQR = 14.5-64.5 days). The patient group on VV-ECMO with a pre-ECMO NLR greater than 11.005 (n = 19) included all mortality (n = 10) and had a median LOS of 49 days (IQR = 25.5-63.5 days). The patient group with on-ECMO NLR less than 17.616 also conferred a survival advantage. There was no significant difference in LOS or duration on VV-ECMO between the two groups, pre-ECMO or on-ECMO. CONCLUSIONS:  A pre-ECMO NLR cutoff was identified and offered statistically significant prognostic value in predicting mortality. A lower on-ECMO NLR value also indicated a survival advantage. Future studies should include NLR within multivariate models to better discern the effect of NLR and elucidate how it can be factored into clinical decision-making. Importantly, this data can be expanded to assess the predictive value of NLR pertaining to the COVID-19-induced ARDS population and matched cohorts.

Comparison of Pre-existing Mood Disorders and Chronic Kidney Disease as Predictors of Ambulatory Status After Major Limb Amputation.

Objective We aim to compare the effects of pre-existing mood disorders and chronic kidney disease (CKD) on ambulation outcomes for patients who have undergone major lower extremity amputation (MLEA) while also stratifying by the presence of social factors. Methods  We performed a retrospective chart review of 700 patients admitted from 2014 to 2022 who underwent MLEA. We performed Chi-square tests and binomial logistic regression with p < 0.05 as our significance level. Results Mood disorder patients have higher rates of independent ambulation if they have familial support (p = 0.022), a listed primary care provider (PCP; p = 0.013), a six-month follow-up (p < 0.001), or a one-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients with a history of mood disorder have significantly decreased odds of prosthesis usage (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40-0.86) but have higher rates of prosthesis usage if they have familial support (p = 0.002), a PCP listed (p = 0.005), a six-month follow-up (p < 0.001), or a one-year follow-up (p < 0.001). CKD patients have significantly decreased odds of eventual independent ambulation (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.97) but have significantly increased rates of independent ambulation if they have familial support (p =0.041) and six-month (p < 0.001) or one-year follow-up (p < 0.001). CKD patients only have significant changes in prosthesis usage with a six-month (p < 0.001) or one-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusions Pre-existing CKD and mood disorders are associated with decreased odds of independent ambulation and prosthesis usage, respectively. Social factors such as family support, a listed PCP, and timely follow-up are associated with markedly improved ambulatory outcomes for MLEA patients with mood disorders and CKD, with significantly improved prosthesis usage outcomes in only the mood disorder population.

Discrepancy Between Invasive and Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients with Sepsis by Vasopressor Status.

INTRODUCTION: Blood pressure (BP) monitoring is an essential component of sepsis management. The Surviving Sepsis Guidelines recommend invasive arterial BP (IABP) monitoring, although the benefits over non-invasive BP (NIBP) monitoring are unclear. This study investigated discrepancies between IABP and NIBP measurement and their clinical significance. We hypothesized that IABP monitoring would be associated with changes in management among patients with sepsis requiring vasopressors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of adult patients admitted to the critical care resuscitation unit at a quaternary medical center between January 1-December 31, 2017. We included patients with sepsis conditions AND IABP monitoring. We defined a clinically significant BP discrepancy (BPD) between NIBP and IABP measurement as a difference of > 10 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) AND change of BP management to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mm Hg. RESULTS: We analyzed 127 patients. Among 57 (45%) requiring vasopressors, 9 (16%) patients had a clinically significant BPD vs 2 patients (3% odds ratio [OR] 6.4; 95% CI: 1.2-30; P = 0.01) without vasopressors. In multivariable logistic regression, higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.02-1.73; P = 0.03) and serum lactate (OR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.003-1.60, P = 0.04) were associated with increased likelihood of clinically significant BPD. There were no complications (95% CI: 0-0.02) from arterial catheter insertions. CONCLUSION: Among our population of septic patients, the use of vasopressors was associated with increased odds of a clinically significant blood pressure discrepancy between IABP and NIBP measurement. Additionally, higher SOFA score and serum lactate were associated with higher likelihood of clinically significant blood pressure discrepancy. Further studies are needed to confirm our observations and investigate the benefits vs the risk of harm of IABP monitoring in patients with sepsis.

Emergency department and transport predictors of neurological deterioration in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and intracranial hypertension are associated with poor outcomes. Blood pressure variability (BPV) and neurological deterioration (ND) are known factors associated with sICH outcomes, but the relationship between BPV and ND in the hyperacute phase remains poorly described. We hypothesized that BPV is associated with ND during patients' initial emergency department (ED) stay and during interhospital transport (IHT) to a tertiary care center. METHODS: A retrospective study of adult patients with sICH was performed. Patients who were transferred from an ED to a tertiary care center between 01/01/2011 and 09/30/2015 and underwent external ventricular drainage were eligible. The outcome was ND at any time before arrival at a tertiary care center. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis, a machine learning algorithm, was used to assign "relative variable importance" (RVI) for important predictive clinical factors. RESULTS: 153 eligible patients were analyzed. Sixty-five (42%) patients developed ND. Maximum ED systolic blood pressure (ED SBPMax) was most predictive of sICH patients developing ND (RVI = 100%). Other important factors for ND included standard deviation in SBP (SBPSD) during ED stay and IHT, with RVI of 43% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ED SBPMax was the strongest predictive factor of ND, while other BPV components were also significant. Our study found evidence that BPV should be prioritized as it may also increase the risk of ND among patients with sICH who required external ventricular drain placement. Future studies should examine whether fluctuations in BP in an ED or IHT setting are associated with increased risk of worsening outcomes.