Moderate and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease Predict Greater 5-Year Mortality following Major Lower-Extremity Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) predicts greater mortality after major lower-extremity amputation (LEA), but it remains poorly understood whether patients with earlier stages of CKD share similar risk. METHODS: We assessed long-term postoperative outcomes for patients with CKD in a retrospective chart review of 565 patients who underwent atraumatic major LEA at a large tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. We stratified patients by renal function and compared outcomes including survival. RESULTS: Preoperative CKD diagnosis was related to many patient characteristics, co-occurred with many comorbidities, and was associated with less follow-up and survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression analyses showed significantly worse 5-year survival for major LEA patients with mild, moderate, or severe CKD compared to major LEA patients with no history of CKD at the time of amputation (P < 0.001). Severe CKD independently predicted worse mortality at 1-year (odds ratio [OR] 2.91; P = 0.003) and 5-years (OR 3.08; P < 0.001). Moderate CKD independently predicted worse 5-year mortality (OR 2.66; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that moderate and severe CKD predict greater long-term mortality following major LEA when controlling for numerous potential confounders. This finding raises questions about the underlying mechanism if causal and highlights an opportunity to improve outcomes with earlier recognition and optimization CKD preoperatively.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Postoperative Outcomes of Osteocutaneous Fibula Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Osteocutaneous fibula free flaps (FFFs) are a fundamental component of reconstructive surgery in the head and neck region, particularly after traumatic injuries or oncologic resections. Despite their utility, FFFs are associated with various postoperative complications, such as infection, flap failure, and donor site morbidity, impacting up to 54% of cases. This study aimed to investigate the influence of socioeconomic variables, with a particular focus on median household income (MHI), on the incidence of postoperative complications in FFF reconstruction for head and neck cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 80 patients who underwent FFF reconstruction for head and neck cancer at a single center from 2016 to 2022 was conducted. Demographic and patient characteristics, including race, MHI, insurance type, history of radiation therapy, and TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) cancer stage, were evaluated. Logistic regression, controlling for comorbidities, was used to assess the impact of MHI on 30-, 90-, and 180-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: The patient population was predominantly male (n = 51, 63.8%) and White (n = 63, 78.8%), with the majority falling within the $55,000 to $100,000 range of MHI (n = 51, 63.8%). Nearly half of the patients had received neoadjuvant radiation treatment (n = 39, 48.75%), and 36.25% (n = 29) presented with osteoradionecrosis. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the $55,000-$100,000 MHI group had significantly lower odds of developing complications in the 0- to 30-day postoperative period when compared with those in the <$55,000 group (odds ratio [OR], 0.440; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.205-0.943; P = 0.035). This trend persisted in the 31- to 90-day period (OR, 0.136; 95% CI, 0.050-0.368; P < 0.001) and was also observed in the likelihood of flap takeback. In addition, the $100,000-$150,000 group had significantly lower odds of developing complications in the 31- to 90-day period (OR, 0.182; 95% CI, 0.035-0.940; P = 0.042). No significant difference was found in the >$150,000 group. CONCLUSIONS: Median household income is a significant determinant and potentially a more influential factor than neoadjuvant radiation in predicting postoperative complications after FFF reconstruction. Disparities in postoperative outcomes based on income highlight the need for substantial health care policy shifts and the development of targeted support strategies for patients with lower MHI.

Preoperative Nil Per Os Duration Predicts Mortality and Ambulation Following Below-Knee Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Routine use of nil per os (NPO) prior to procedures has been associated with dehydration and malnutrition leading to patient discomfort. We aim to examine how duration of NPO status affects postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective below-knee amputation (BKA). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 92 patients who underwent elective BKA between 2014-2022 for noninfectious indications. We performed statistical analysis using Chi-square tests, t-tests, and linear/logistic regression with odds ratio using P < .05 as our significance level. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.0 ± 16.7 years, and there were 64 (70%) male patients and 41 (45%) Black patients. Mean NPO duration was 12.9 ± 4.7 hours. Patients with longer NPO duration were associated with increased rates of postoperative stroke (P = .03). Patients with shorter NPO duration had significantly lower mean BUN on postoperative day (POD) 1 (14.5, P < .001) and POD 3 (14.1, P < .001) compared to preoperative mean BUN (16.8), however this normalized by POD 7 (19.2, P = .26). There were no changes in postoperative renal function based on baseline kidney disease status or associated with longer NPO duration. Shorter NPO duration was a predictor of increased likelihood of 1-year follow-up (OR: 2.9 [1.24-6.79], P = .01), independent ambulation (OR: 2.7 [1.03-7.34], P = .04), and decreased mortality (OR: .11 [.013-.91], P = .04). CONCLUSION: While NPO duration does not appear to result in postoperative renal dysfunction, prolonged NPO duration predicts worse rates of follow-up, ambulation, and survival and is associated with increased stroke rates.

Opioid Use Disorder in Patients Undergoing Major Lower Extremity Amputation: Prevalence and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with a history of Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) have higher postoperative complication rates and mortality in many settings. Yet, it remains poorly understood how the opioid epidemic has affected patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation (LEA) and whether outcomes differ by OUD status. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all 689 patients who underwent major LEA at a large tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. This study assessed patient characteristics and long-term postoperative outcomes for patients with preoperative OUD. RESULTS: 133 (19.3%) patients had a lifetime history of preoperative OUD. Preoperative OUD was associated with key characteristics, comorbidities, and outcome measures. OUD was significantly associated with younger age (P < .001), black race (P = .026), single relationship status (P < .001), BMI <30 (P = .024), no primary care provider (P = .004), and Medicaid insurance (P < .001). Comorbidities significantly associated with OUD include current smoking (P < .001), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV; P = .003), and history of osteomyelitis (P < .001). Preoperative OUD independently predicted lower rates of 30-60-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] .54, P = .018) and 1-12-month reamputation (OR .41, P = .006). There was no significant difference in long-term mortality and follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the prevalence of OUD in patients undergoing major LEA and reports associations and long-term outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of recognizing OUD and raise questions about the mechanisms underlying its relation to rates of postoperative readmission and reamputation.