Efficacy of mitral annular velocity as an alternative marker of left ventricular global longitudinal strain to detect the risk of cancer therapy-related cardiac disorders.

PURPOSE: Left ventricular longitudinal function can be rapidly evaluated by measuring S' and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) using tissue Doppler imaging. Even when the image quality is poor and the left ventricular endocardium is not visible, S' and MAPSE can be measured if the mitral annulus is visible. However, the utility of S' and MAPSE in diagnosing cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of S' and MAPSE and determine appropriate cutoff values. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 279 breast cancer patients who underwent pre- or postoperative chemotherapy with anthracyclines and trastuzumab from April 2020 to November 2022. We compared echocardiographic data before chemotherapy, 6 months after chemotherapy initiation, and 1 year later. CTRCD was defined as a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction below 50%, with a decrease of ≥10% from baseline or a relative decrease in left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) of ≥15%. RESULTS: A total of 256 participants were included in this study, with a mean age of 50.2 ± 11 years. Fifty-six individuals (22%) developed CTRCD within 1 year after starting chemotherapy. The cutoff value for septal S' was 6.85 cm/s (AUC = .81, p < .001; sensitivity 74%; specificity 73%), and for MAPSE was 11.7 mm (AUC = .65, p = .02; sensitivity 79%; specificity 45%). None of the cases with septal S' exceeding 6.85 cm/s had an LVGLS of ≤15%. CONCLUSIONS: Septal S' is a useful indicator for diagnosing CTRCD. HIGHLIGHTS: Septal S' decreased at the same time or earlier than the decrease in LVGLS. The septal S' demonstrated higher diagnostic ability for CTRCD compared to LVGLS.

Tamoxifen withdrawal in women with progressive metastatic breast cancer: a case series of six patients.

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancers after a period of response to tamoxifen develop resistance, and the disease progresses clinically. Domination of partial agonistic activity of tamoxifen over its antagonist activity has been implicated as one of the mechanisms for acquired tamoxifen resistance. Six patients with ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with tamoxifen withdrawal were retrospectively reviewed. Three patients were premenopausal and three were postmenopausal at the beginning of this treatment. Three patients had stage IV disease and three had recurrent breast cancers with median disease-free intervals of 153 months. The treatment lines of tamoxifen therapy were first-line in two, second-line in two, and third-line in one patient. One patient had relapsed during adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. The median duration of tamoxifen therapy was 16 months. The metastatic disease sites at the time of tamoxifen withdrawal were lymph nodes in six, bone in three, chest wall in one, lung in two, pleura in one, and liver in one patient. The median duration of tamoxifen withdrawal was 6.5 months (range 5-> 23 months). Five of six patients had clinical benefits with tamoxifen withdrawal: partial response in one, long stable disease (SD) in four, and SD in one patient. Five patients were treated with aromatase inhibitors after tamoxifen withdrawal. Two patients had metastatic lymph nodes examined by multi-gene panel testing, and both of their tumors had the AKT1 E17K somatic mutation. One patient also had a BRCA1 germline mutation. Tamoxifen withdrawal at the time of tumor progression while on treatment might be an important treatment option, especially for women with highly endocrine-responsive disease.