Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Fertil Steril ; 11(2): 85-92, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28670425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of immature oocytes derived from stimulated cycles could be of great importance, particularly for urgent fertility preservation cases. The current study aimed to determine whether in vitro maturation (IVM) was more successful before or after vitrification of these oocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was performed in a private in vitro fertilization (IVF) center. We collected 318 germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes from 104 stimulated oocyte donation cycles. Oocytes were divided into two groups according to whether vitrification was applied at the GV stage (group 1) or in vitro matured to the metaphase II (MII) stage and then vitrified (group 2). In the control group (group 3), oocytes were in vitro matured without vitrification. In all three groups, we assessed survival rate after warming, maturation rate, and MII-spindle/chromosome configurations. The chi-square test was used to compare rates between the three groups. Statistical significance was defined at P<0.05 and we used Bonferroni criterion to assess statistical significance regarding the various pairs of groups. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 17.0 was used to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the survival rate after vitrification and warming of GV (93.5%) and MII oocytes (90.8%). A significantly higher maturation rate occurred when IVM was performed before vitrification (82.9%) compared to after vitrification (51%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of normal spindle/ chromosome configurations among warmed oocytes matured in vitro before (50.0%) or after (41.2%) vitrification. However, a higher incidence of normal spindle/chromosome configurations existed in the in vitro matured oocytes which were not subjected to vitrification (fresh oocytes, 77.9%). CONCLUSION: In stimulated cycles, vitrification of in vitro matured MII oocytes rather than GV oocytes seems to be more efficient. This approach needs to be verified in nonstimulated fertility preservation cases.

2.
Fertil Steril ; 106(6): 1348-1355, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27490043

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether is possible to vitrify oocytes in an aseptic (hermetically closed) fashion and maintain clinical results comparable with those of fresh oocytes. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, cohort, noninferiority trial. SETTING: Private in vitro fertilization center. PATIENT(S): One hundred eighty-four recipients of donated vitrified oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): Closed system vitrification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rate per cycle and clinical pregnancy rate per cycle. RESULT(S): No statistically significant differences were observed between two groups regarding the pregnancy rate per cycle (63.1% vs. 60.9%) or the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle (55.4% vs. 58.7%). Biochemical pregnancy rate was statistically significantly higher in the fresh group (7.6% vs. 2.2%). The mean number of embryos transferred was similar (2.0 ± 0.0 vs. 1.97 ± 0.3). Concerning embryologic data, there were no statistically significant differences regarding the fertilization, cleavage, top quality day-3 embryo, or blastocyst rates, whereas the top quality blastocyst rate on day 5 was statistically significantly higher in the fresh oocyte group (31.7% vs. 26.1%). CONCLUSION(S): Aseptically (in a closed system) vitrified oocytes show similar clinical efficiency compared with their sibling fresh oocytes.


Subject(s)
Asepsis/methods , Cryopreservation/methods , Infertility/therapy , Oocyte Donation , Tissue Preservation/methods , Adult , Asepsis/instrumentation , Cryopreservation/instrumentation , Embryo Transfer , Female , Fertility , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infertility/diagnosis , Infertility/physiopathology , Live Birth , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Prospective Studies , Tissue Preservation/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Vitrification
3.
Dermatology ; 221(1): 63-70, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20516651

ABSTRACT

Chloracne, first described by Herxheimer in 1899, is a dermatosis consisting of more or less diffuse acneiform lesions distributed prevalently on the face and on body areas not usually affected by acne and caused by chronic or acute exposure to halogenated chemical compounds. Dioxin is the common name for dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, contaminants nearly ubiquitous in the environment and highly resistant to chemical and biological degradation. These compounds can survive for decades in the environment and accumulate in the human and animal food chains. Chloracne is characterized by the onset of numerous comedo-like lesions and yellowish cysts on the face, particularly on the cheeks, that can spread to the trunk and other body regions not usually affected by acne vulgaris, with diffuse grayish skin pigmentation and sometimes associated with hypertrichosis and areas of folliculitis. The lesions may occasionally be accompanied by skin or systemic manifestations. We report 9 cases of chloracne, 8 of them with rapid onset in patients residing in the same building, and 1 in a patient occupationally exposed to halogenated compounds. In our series, the doses of dioxin and polychlorinated biphenyls in the soil, water and plant material, and the serum titer of dioxin were within the normal range. This consideration raises the issue of the need to revise the serum threshold for dioxin poisoning and the environmental threshold. We wish also to underline the value of dermatopathology in the differential diagnosis of chloracne.


Subject(s)
Benzofurans/toxicity , Chloracne/etiology , Chloracne/pathology , Dioxins/toxicity , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chloracne/blood , Dioxins/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Triglycerides/blood
4.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 18(2): 276-81, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19192350

ABSTRACT

The effect that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists exert on endometrial receptivity has not yet been elucidated. GnRH antagonists might directly affect oocytes, the embryo and/or the endometrium. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct effect of GnRH antagonists on the endometrium in oocyte donation cycles. In an oocyte donation programme, oocytes from each donor (n = 49), stimulated with gonadotrophins and a GnRH antagonist, were equally shared between two different matched recipients. Recipients were randomly allocated to either receive a GnRH antagonist concomitant to donor during their endometrial priming with oestradiol (group I, n = 49) or to solely continue with their endometrial preparation (group II, n = 49). Pregnancy rate was 55.1% in group I and 59.1% in group II. Implantation rate was 26.1% in group I and 24.4% in group II. Endometrial thickness was also similar between the two groups on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin injection to the donor. In conclusion, GnRH antagonist administration during the proliferative phase at a dose of 0.25 mg per day does not appear to adversely affect endometrial receptivity in oocyte recipients.


Subject(s)
Embryo Implantation/drug effects , Endometrium/drug effects , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors , Hormone Antagonists/pharmacology , Oocytes/transplantation , Transplantation , Adult , Algorithms , Double-Blind Method , Endometrium/physiology , Female , Follicular Phase/drug effects , Follicular Phase/physiology , Hormone Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Oocyte Donation/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Transplantation/physiology
5.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 25(1): 53-9, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19165663

ABSTRACT

The effect of low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration in the proliferative phase of oocyte recipients was investigated in a prospective randomized trial. Sibling oocytes from the same donor were shared at random among two different recipients. In group I oocyte recipients received 750 IU of hCG every three days concomitant to endometrial preparation with estradiol until hCG injection to the donor, whereas in group II recipients received no hCG during endometrial priming with estradiol. Endometrial thickness was significantly lower in group I compared with group II, although similar endometrial thickness was detected during the mock cycle. Pregnancy rates were significantly lower in group I than in group II (13.6% vs. 45.4%, p<0.05). Implantation rates were also significantly lower in group I (1.7% vs. 22.4%, p<0.01). The study was discontinued prematurely for ethical reasons when 22 cycles were completed, as pregnancy rates were very low in group I. In conclusion, hCG administration in the proliferative phase might directly affect endometrial proliferation and receptivity.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin/pharmacology , Embryo Implantation/drug effects , Follicular Phase/drug effects , Oocytes/physiology , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Endometrium/drug effects , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Fertilization in Vitro , Follicular Phase/physiology , Humans , Infertility, Female/therapy , Menotropins/administration & dosage , Oocytes/drug effects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...