ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not uncommon. The choice between patellar resurfacing or retention in TKA has remained controversial. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the impact of patellar resurfacing on the incidence of patellar crepitus. In addition, we compared the clinical outcomes and satisfaction between the patients who underwent patellar retention or resurfacing. METHODS: A total of 63 patients randomly received patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing TKA by one surgeon at Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran during May 2014-February 2017. Finally, 29 patients in the resurfaced group and 44 subjects with retained patella were evaluated pre-op and in an average follow-up period of 8.68 months using the clinical Knee Society Score (KSS), functional KSS, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups regarding the satisfaction of patients, KSS, and KOOS. It was shown that the latter scores improved in both groups in the follow-up period. Nonetheless, patellar crepitus was not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: According to the results of the present study, patellar resurfacing did not lead to decreased patellar crepitus or enhanced clinical outcomes of TKA.
ABSTRACT
Joint replacement is currently on the rise with a high community burden. A registry was designed to evaluate the costs, possible complications, and rate of revisions as well as finding the most effective techniques, risk factors associated with poor results, indications for revision surgeries, and also demographic evaluation of patients undergoing joint replacement surgery in Iran.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is no difference in the functional outcomes 6 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis between patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing. Thus, we have performed this study to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of TKA performed with and without the patella resurfacing. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK) were randomized to receive patellar resurfacing (n=24; resurfaced group) or to retain their native patella (n=26; non-resurfaced group) based on envelope selection and provided informed consent. Disease specific outcomes including Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Function Score (KSKS-F), Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 36 (SF-36), and functional patella-related activities were measured within six months of follow-up. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the resurfaced and non-resurfaced groups in pre and post-operative improvement of range of motion (ROM) (P=0.421), KSS (P=0.782, P=0.553), KSKS-F (P=0.241, P=0.293), AKPS (P=0.128, P=0.443), WOMAC (P=0.700, P=0.282), and pain scores (P=0.120, P=0.508). There was no difference in ROM between resurfaced and non-resurfaced group pre (15.24° and 15.45°) and post-operative (18.48° and 18.74). No side effects related to patella was observed in any of the groups. Revision was required in none of the participants. CONCLUSION: The results showed no significant difference between patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing in TKA for all outcome measures in a short term.Level of evidence: I.
