ABSTRACT
Depression is a common psychological problem in adolescence. Recent research suggests that group cognitive-behavioral interventions can reduce and prevent symptoms of depression in youth. Few studies have tested the effectiveness of such interventions when delivered by school teachers and counselors (as opposed to research team staff). We evaluated the effectiveness of the Penn Resiliency Program for adolescents (PRP-A), a school-based group intervention that targets cognitive behavioral risk factors for depression. We randomly assigned 408 middle school students (ages 10-15) to one of three conditions: PRP-A, PRP-AP (in which adolescents participated in PRP-A and parents were invited to attend a parent intervention component), or a school-as-usual control. Adolescents completed measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, cognitive style, and coping at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 6-month follow-up. PRP-A reduced depression symptoms relative to the school as usual control. Baseline levels of hopelessness moderated intervention effects. Among participants with average and high levels of hopelessness, PRP (A and AP) significantly improved depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, hopelessness, and active coping relative to control. Among participants with low baseline hopelessness, we found no intervention effects. PRP-AP was not more effective than PRP-A alone. We found no intervention effects on clinical levels of depression or anxiety. These findings suggest that cognitive-behavioral interventions can be beneficial when delivered by school teachers and counselors. These interventions may be most helpful to students with elevated hopelessness.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depression/prevention & control , Depressive Disorder/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Depression/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Parents/psychology , Risk Factors , Students/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study was conducted as part of a larger randomized trial to examine barriers and facilitators to accessing and providing comprehensive primary health care for individuals with serious mental illnesses. We examined the perspectives of administrators and providers in a behavioral health organization surrounding the use of a nurse practitioner model of delivering primary healthcare. METHODS: Ten key informant interviews were conducted and analyzed using qualitative data analysis software. Concepts and themes regarding access to and delivery of primary healthcare were inductively derived from the data. RESULTS: Results confirmed significant issues related to chronic physical health problems among individuals with psychiatric disabilities and detailed a host of barriers to receiving health care as well as the perceived benefits of the nurse practitioner intervention. Financial challenges played a significant role in the organization's ability to make primary and mental health care integration a sustainable endeavor. In addition, staff faced increased burdens on their time due to adding a focus on physical health to their existing job duties. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A nurse practitioner stationed in a behavioral healthcare setting is viewed by administrators and providers as extremely beneficial in addressing issues of access to comprehensive and integrated primary healthcare for individuals with severe psychiatric disabilities but sustaining such a model of care is not without organizational challenges.
