Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Urol Rep ; 22(9): 45, 2021 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34427779

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges for urology resident education. In this review, we discuss the pandemic's impact on urology trainees and their education. RECENT FINDINGS: Urology trainees were often redeployed to frontline services in unfamiliar clinical settings. Residents often experienced increased levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. Many programs instituted virtual "check-ins" and formed liaisons with mental health services to foster cohesiveness. Urology trainees experienced the integration of telehealth into the clinical realm. Virtual surgery lectures and simulations were utilized to augment surgical education. Academic governing bodies upheld resident protections and provided dynamic guidance for training requirement throughout the pandemic. Medical students were unable to participate in traditional in-person away rotations and interviews, complicating the residency application process. The COVID-19 pandemic shook the healthcare system and ushered in seismic changes for urology trainees worldwide. Though the longstanding effects of the pandemic remain to be seen, urology residents have demonstrated tremendous resilience and bravery throughout this challenging period, and those qualities will undeniably withstand the test of time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Urology , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Urology/education
2.
Eur Urol ; 79(4): 468-477, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046271

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC) is a recently described tumor entity. Several questions remain about its epidemiology, molecular features, and clinical behavior. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate clinicopathologic and molecular features of CCPRCC, and compare it with more common kidney cancer subtypes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified 89 CCPRCC patients and compared their clinicopathologic features with 1120 localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and 129 type 1 papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Nonparametric statistical testing was used to compare relevant features between tumor types. Overall, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and metastasis-free survival estimates were calculated from initial diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with ipsilateral multifocal disease were explored further. A subset of CCPRCC tumors underwent genomic analysis and were compared with other RCC subtypes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A higher proportion of female (45% vs 32%) and African-American (19% vs 3%) patients were observed in the CCPRCC cohort than in the ccRCC and pRCC cohorts. CCPRCC tumors also had increased odds of presenting with additional ipsilateral masses (odds ratio [OR]: 4.41 [confidence interval {CI}: 2.34, 8.15], p < 0.001) and bilateral disease (OR: 4.80 [CI: 2.40, 9.59], p < 0.001) compared with ccRCC tumors. On molecular analysis, CCPRCC tumors showed fewer somatic aberrations and a greater degree of mitochondrial DNA depletion. In multifocal CCPRCC tumors, histologic concordance among the different renal cell carcinoma masses was estimated at 44% (7/16), and none of the individuals presenting exclusively with CCPRCC tumors developed metastatic disease after 5 yr. In contrast, multifocal tumors with CCPRCC and other nonconcordant histologies were more likely to experience adverse outcomes (CSS, log rank p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: CCPRCC is characterized by distinct molecular and epidemiologic features that could be used to refine current diagnostic approaches. Although their clinical course is generally indolent, multifocal CCPRCC tumors represent a unique diagnostic challenge. In this context, single-mass biopsies could miss concomitant aggressive disease, with a potential negative impact on patient outcomes. Furthermore, high discordance rates in multifocal CCPRCC tumors have important clinical implications in management. PATIENT SUMMARY: We explored the molecular and clinical features of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC) relative to other kidney cancer subtypes. While CCPRCC generally conveys a good prognosis, additional caution should be taken when it is diagnosed using biopsy if multiple kidney masses are present.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies
3.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 15(2): E103-E109, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32744993

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the trajectory of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after kidney surgery in patients with kidney cancer and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We identified 1204 consecutive patients in our institutional database with preoperative CKD undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy from 1998-2016. Postoperative eGFR was tracked, with patients censored when receiving dialysis or kidney transplantation. A multivariable mixed-effects models assessed associations between preoperative baseline patient and tumor characteristics, and longitudinal eGFR. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression were used to estimate overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and cumulative incidence of dialysis. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 892 (74.1%), 271 (22.5%), and 41 (3.4%) patients had CKD stage 3a, 3b, and 4/5, respectively. There were 55 patients dialyzed and 355 deaths (99 from kidney cancer). Median followup was 8.1 years, with 25 781 postoperative eGFR measurements. Factors associated with decreasing eGFR postoperatively included radical nephrectomy, male gender, older age, increased body mass index (BMI), and cardiovascular risk factors. We observed a significant interaction effect between time from surgery and preoperative CKD stage: the eGFR of stage 3a patients improved, while stage ≥3b declined (p<0.001). The two-year and five-year cumulative incidence of dialysis was 1.8% (1.1-2.6%) and 3.1% (2.2-4.2%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of dialysis, with death as a competing event, significantly differed by preoperative CKD stage. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CKD stage ≥3b is independently associated with a higher risk of declining renal function, dialysis, and mortality. With careful selection, patients with preoperative CKD withstand kidney surgery with low rates of dialysis.

4.
Int J Clin Pract ; 74(9): e13559, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460433

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rapid spread of COVID-19 has placed tremendous strain on the American healthcare system. Few prior studies have evaluated the well-being of or changes to training for American resident physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to study predictors of trainee well-being and changes to clinical practice using an anonymous survey of American urology residents. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary, 47-question survey was sent to all ACGME-accredited urology programmes in the United States. We executed a cross-sectional analysis evaluating risk factors of perception of anxiety and depression both at work and home and educational outcomes. Multiple linear regressions models were used to estimate beta coefficients and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among ~1800 urology residents in the USA, 356 (20%) responded. Among these respondents, 24 had missing data leaving a sample size of 332. Important risk factors of mental health outcomes included perception of access to PPE, local COVID-19 severity and perception of susceptible household members. Risk factors for declination of redeployment included current redeployment, having children and concerns regarding ability to reach case minimums. Risk factors for concern of achieving operative autonomy included cancellation of elective cases and higher level of training. CONCLUSIONS: Several potential actions, which could be taken by urology residency programme directors and hospital administration, may optimise urology resident well-being, morale, and education. These include advocating for adequate access to PPE, providing support at both the residency programme and institutional levels, instituting telehealth education programmes, and fostering a sense of shared responsibility of COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Internship and Residency , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Students, Medical/psychology , Urology/education , Adult , COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...