Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Genomics ; 19(1): 623, 2018 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30134926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Genomic regions repressed for DNA replication, resulting in either delayed replication in S phase or underreplication in polyploid cells, are thought to be controlled by inhibition of replication origin activation. Studies in Drosophila polytene cells, however, raised the possibility that impeding replication fork progression also plays a major role. RESULTS: We exploited genomic regions underreplicated (URs) with tissue specificity in Drosophila polytene cells to analyze mechanisms of replication repression. By localizing the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) in the genome of the larval fat body and comparing this to ORC binding in the salivary gland, we found that sites of ORC binding show extensive tissue specificity. In contrast, there are common domains nearly devoid of ORC in the salivary gland and fat body that also have reduced density of ORC binding sites in diploid cells. Strikingly, domains lacking ORC can still be replicated in some polytene tissues, showing absence of ORC and origins is insufficient to repress replication. Analysis of the width and location of the URs with respect to ORC position indicates that whether or not a genomic region lacking ORC is replicated is controlled by whether replication forks formed outside the region are inhibited. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that inhibition of replication fork progression can block replication across genomic regions that constitutively lack ORC. Replication fork progression can be inhibited in both tissue-specific and genome region-specific ways. Consequently, when evaluating sources of genome instability it is important to consider altered control of replication forks in response to differentiation.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/genetics , Chromosome Structures , DNA Replication/genetics , Organogenesis/genetics , Origin Recognition Complex/metabolism , Replication Origin/physiology , Animals , Binding Sites , Chromosome Structures/chemistry , Chromosome Structures/genetics , Chromosome Structures/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian , Larva , Organ Specificity/genetics
2.
Elife ; 72018 02 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29480805

ABSTRACT

The Drosophila Pan Gu (PNG) kinase complex regulates hundreds of maternal mRNAs that become translationally repressed or activated as the oocyte transitions to an embryo. In a previous paper (Hara et al., 2017), we demonstrated PNG activity is under tight developmental control and restricted to this transition. Here, examination of PNG specificity showed it to be a Thr-kinase yet lacking a clear phosphorylation site consensus sequence. An unbiased biochemical screen for PNG substrates identified the conserved translational repressor Trailer Hitch (TRAL). Phosphomimetic mutation of the PNG phospho-sites in TRAL reduced its ability to inhibit translation in vitro. In vivo, mutation of tral dominantly suppressed png mutants and restored Cyclin B protein levels. The repressor Pumilio (PUM) has the same relationship with PNG, and we also show that PUM is a PNG substrate. Furthermore, PNG can phosphorylate BICC and ME31B, repressors that bind TRAL in cytoplasmic RNPs. Therefore, PNG likely promotes translation at the oocyte-to-embryo transition by phosphorylating and inactivating translational repressors.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/enzymology , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Ribonucleoproteins/metabolism , Animals , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Phosphorylation , Protein Interaction Mapping
3.
G3 (Bethesda) ; 4(10): 1849-58, 2014 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25081981

ABSTRACT

The Shugoshin (Sgo) protein family helps to ensure proper chromosome segregation by protecting cohesion at the centromere by preventing cleavage of the cohesin complex. Some Sgo proteins also influence other aspects of kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Although many Sgo members require Aurora B kinase to localize to the centromere, factors controlling delocalization are poorly understood and diverse. Moreover, it is not clear how Sgo function is inactivated and whether this is distinct from delocalization. We investigated these questions in Drosophila melanogaster, an organism with superb chromosome cytology to monitor Sgo localization and quantitative assays to test its function in sister-chromatid segregation in meiosis. Previous research showed that in mitosis in cell culture, phosphorylation of the Drosophila Sgo, MEI-S332, by Aurora B promotes centromere localization, whereas Polo phosphorylation promotes delocalization. These studies also suggested that MEI-S332 can be inactivated independently of delocalization, a conclusion supported here by localization and function studies in meiosis. Phosphoresistant and phosphomimetic mutants for the Aurora B and Polo phosphorylation sites were examined for effects on MEI-S332 localization and chromosome segregation in meiosis. Strikingly, MEI-S332 with a phosphomimetic mutation in the Aurora B phosphorylation site prematurely dissociates from the centromeres in meiosis I. Despite the absence of MEI-S332 on meiosis II centromeres in male meiosis, sister chromatids segregate normally, demonstrating that detectable levels of this Sgo are not essential for chromosome congression, kinetochore biorientation, or spindle assembly.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Meiosis , Anaphase , Animals , Aurora Kinase B/genetics , Aurora Kinase B/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Centromere/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Chromosome Segregation , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Male , Mutagenesis , Phosphorylation , Protein Binding , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Sex Chromosomes , Spermatocytes/metabolism , Cohesins
4.
Genes Dev ; 25(13): 1384-98, 2011 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21724831

ABSTRACT

In metazoans, how replication origins are specified and subsequently activated is not well understood. Drosophila amplicons in follicle cells (DAFCs) are genomic regions that undergo rereplication to increase DNA copy number. We identified all DAFCs by comparative genomic hybridization, uncovering two new amplicons in addition to four known previously. The complete identification of all DAFCs enabled us to investigate these in vivo replicons with respect to parameters of transcription, localization of the origin recognition complex (ORC), and histone acetylation, yielding important insights into gene amplification as a metazoan replication model. Significantly, ORC is bound across domains spanning 10 or more kilobases at the DAFC rather than at a specific site. Additionally, ORC is bound at many regions that do not undergo amplification, and, in contrast to cell culture, these regions do not correlate with high gene expression. As a developmental strategy, gene amplification is not the predominant means of achieving high expression levels, even in cells capable of amplification. Intriguingly, we found that, in some strains, a new amplicon, DAFC-22B, does not amplify, a consequence of distant repression of ORC binding and origin activation. This repression is alleviated when a fragment containing the origin is placed in different genomic contexts.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Amplification , Gene Expression Regulation , Origin Recognition Complex/metabolism , Acetylation , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Histones/metabolism , Protein Binding , Protein Structure, Tertiary
5.
Dev Cell ; 8(3): 435-42, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15737938

ABSTRACT

Although traditional organism-based mutational analysis is powerful in identifying genes involved in specific biological processes, limitations include incomplete coverage and time required for gene identification. Biochemical screens using cell transfection or yeast two-hybrid methods are rapid, but they are limited by cDNA library quality. The recent establishment of "uni-gene sets" has made it feasible to biochemically screen an organism's entire genome. Radiolabeled protein pools prepared from the Drosophila Gene Collection were used in a Drosophila in vitro expression cloning ("DIVEC") screen for substrates of PAN GU kinase, which is crucial for S-M embryonic cell cycles. Ablation of one identified substrate, Mat89Bb, by RNAi produces a polyploid phenotype similar to that of pan gu mutants. Xenopus embryos injected with Mat89Bb morpholinos arrest with polyploid nuclei, and Mat89Bb RNAi in HeLa cells gives rise to multinucleated cells. Thus, Mat89Bb plays an evolutionarily conserved role as a crucial regulator of both cell cycle and development.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle/physiology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/enzymology , Embryonic Development/physiology , Genome , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Animals , Cloning, Molecular , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/enzymology , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian/cytology , HeLa Cells , Humans , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Substrate Specificity/genetics , Xenopus/embryology , Xenopus/metabolism
6.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 99(17): 11217-22, 2002 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12169670

ABSTRACT

Animals and plants use modified cell cycles to achieve particular developmental strategies. In one common example, most animals and plants have tissues in which the cells become polyploid or polytene by means of an S-G cycle, but the mechanism by which mitosis is inhibited in the endo cycle is not understood. The Drosophila morula (mr) gene regulates variant cell cycles, because in addition to disrupting the archetypal cycle (G1-S-G2-M), mr mutations affect the rapid embryonic (S-M) divisions as well as the endo cycle (S-G) that produces polyploid cells. In dividing cells mr mutations cause a metaphase arrest, and endo cycling nurse cells inappropriately reenter mitosis in mr mutants. We show mr encodes the APC2 subunit of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome. This finding demonstrates that anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome is required not only in proliferating cells but also to block mitosis in some endo cycles. The mr mutants further indicate that transient mitotic functions in endo cycles change chromosome morphology from polytene to polyploid.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle/physiology , Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Ligases/genetics , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes , Amino Acid Sequence , Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Cell Division/genetics , Cell Division/physiology , Cloning, Molecular , Drosophila/growth & development , Embryo, Nonmammalian/physiology , Female , Ligases/physiology , Mitosis/physiology , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutagenesis , Open Reading Frames , Ovary/physiology , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...