Comparison of Toric Implantable Collamer Lens and Toric Artiflex Phakic IOLs in Terms of Visual Outcome: a Paired Contralateral Eye Study.

PURPOSE: This study sought to compare the postoperative visual outcomes of toric implantable collamer lens (T-ICL) with toric Artiflex (T-Artiflex) lenses. DESIGN: Alternating treatment, contralateral eye matched clinical study. METHODS: This study compared 82 eyes of 41 patients with T-ICL lenses in one eye and toric Artiflex implantation in the contralateral eye to correct myopic astigmatism. Safety, efficacy, predictability, astigmatic vector changes, contrast sensitivity, endothelial cell count, and possible adverse events were assessed at least 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 12 months, the safety index was mean 1.40 ± 0.70 in the T-ICL group and 1.20 ± 0.21 in the T-Artiflex group. Furthermore, their mean efficacy indexes were 1.24 ± 0.42 and 1.08 ± 0.23, respectively (P = .029). A total of 39 eyes (95%) in the T-ICL group and 41 eyes (100%) in the T-Artiflex group were within ±1.00 diopter (D) of emmetropia and 33 eyes (80%) and 34 eyes (83%) were within ±0.5 D of emmetropia, respectively. Vector analysis revealed mean index of success as large as 0.25 ± 0.22 in the T-ICL group and 0.24 ± 0.15 in the T-Artiflex group. Postoperative contrast sensitivities were equal in both groups under mesopic conditions for any given spatial frequency. There was an endothelial loss of 2.18% and 1.95% in the T-ICL and T-Artiflex groups, respectively. There were no significant complications in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both lenses showed promising results in terms of safety, efficacy, and predictability for correction of myopic astigmatism. As shown in this paired-eye study, most outcomes were almost identical, and neither of these lenses were clinically superior to the other.

Comparison of densitometric profile after deep lamellar keratoplasty with two different techniques for treatment of keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To compare densitometric outcome of two techniques of deep lamellar keratoplasty using Pentacam HR corneal densitometry software. METHODS: Postoperative outcomes of 31 patients with big bubble (BB) and 28 patients with Melles (M) surgery for the treatment of keratoconus were evaluated. Data were gathered at least 3 months after the removal of all sutures including demographic data, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction and endothelial cell count. Moreover, the Scheimpflug images were taken by Pentacam® HR to assess keratometric profile, densitometric outcomes in different depths and zones of the cornea and central corneal thickness. Anterior segment OCT was performed in ten cases of M group. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes with BB and 27 eyes M surgery were enrolled. Comparison of densitometric profile between groups revealed no statistical significance in zone 0-2 mm, zone 2-6 mm and zone 10-12 mm in all depths (all P values > 0.05). Zone 6-10 mm of M group had lower densitometric readings (more transparent) in anterior, central and posterior layers of the cornea in comparison with BB group (all P < 0.05). Also no statistical difference was found in UCDVA, BSCVA, spherical or cylindrical refractive error, and spherical equivalent, keratometric readings, endothelial cell count and central corneal thickness in two groups (all P values > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Densitometric profiles were identical in both methods in visually important zones so as visual and refractive outcomes.