Molecular targets of nitric-oxide-donating aspirin in cancer.

Nitric-oxide-donating aspirin (NO-ASA), consisting of ASA (aspirin) plus an -ONO2 moiety linked to it via a molecular spacer, is a new drug for cancer prevention. NO-ASA seems to overcome the low potency and toxicity of traditional ASA. The -ONO2 moiety is responsible for releasing NO, and it appears to be required for biological activity. In studies in vitro, NO-ASA inhibits the growth of colon, pancreatic, prostate, lung, skin, leukaemia and breast cancer cells, and is up to 6000-fold more potent than traditional ASA. This effect is owing to cell kinetics [inhibition of proliferation, induction of apoptosis (multiple criteria) and blocking the G1 to S cell-cycle transition] and cell signalling [inhibition of Wnt signalling (IC50=0.2 microM), inhibition of NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappaB) activation (IC50=7.5 microM), inhibition of nitric oxide synthase-2 expression (IC50=48 microM), inhibition of MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) signalling (IC50=10 microM) and induction of cyclo-oxygenase-2 at approx. 10 microM]. In studies in vivo, NO-ASA inhibits intestinal carcinogenesis in Min mice (tumour multiplicity was reduced by 59% after 3 weeks, with no effect in control animals and no side effects) and in the N-nitrosobis(2-oxopropyl)amine model of pancreatic cancer, where there was an 89% reduction in NO-ASA (3000 p.p.m. in the diet)-treated animals (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant effect by traditional ASA at equimolar doses. Our data indicate that NO-ASA is a highly promising agent for the prevention and/or treatment of cancer.

Is COX-2 a 'collateral' target in cancer prevention?

NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) prevent colon and other cancers. The fact that NSAIDs inhibit the eicosanoid pathway prompted mechanistic drug-developmental work focusing on COX (cyclo-oxygenase) and its products. The increased prostaglandin E2 levels and the overexpression of COX-2 in colon and many other cancers provided the rationale for clinical trials with COX-2 inhibitors for cancer prevention or treatment. However, one COX-2 inhibitor has been withdrawn from the market because of cardiovascular side effects, and there are concerns about a class effect. Evidence suggests that COX-2 may not be the only, or the ideal, target for cancer prevention; for example, COX-2 is not expressed in human aberrant crypt foci, the earliest recognizable pre-malignant lesion in the colon; COX-2 is expressed in less than half of the adenomas; in vitro data show that NSAIDs do not require the presence of COX-2 to prevent cancer; in familial adenomatous polyposis, the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, had a modest effect, which was weaker than that of a traditional NSAID; and COX-2-specific inhibitors have several COX-2-independent activities, which may account for part of their cancer-preventive properties. The multiple COX-2-independent targets, and the limitations of COX-2 inhibitors, suggest the need to explore targets other than COX-2.

Inhibition of bacterial superantigens by peptides and antibodies.

The pyrogenic exotoxins of group A streptococci and staphylococcal enterotoxins are a family of structurally related superantigens with similar biological activity. Two distinct areas have been identified which have a highly conserved amino acid homology in all of the toxin families. A number of peptides were constructed from these regions, some of which were concatenated and polymerized to enhance their immunogenicity in animals. Antibodies prepared against these polymerized peptides were used to serologically identify the majority of the superantigen toxins, block the biological activities of the superantigens, and protect an experimental animal model against shock. In addition certain peptides were able per se to block up to 90% of the proliferative responses induced by the toxins. The peptide also proved protective in a septic shock model in mice. Binding experiments indicate that the peptide binds tightly to the major histocompatibility complex class II molecule, thus preventing binding and hence activation of the superantigen. The selective and rapid binding of the peptide to the major histocompatibility complex class II molecule may lead to a novel therapeutic modality in treatment of superantigen-mediated diseases.

The retinoid fenretinide inhibits proliferation and downregulates cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression in human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines.

Fenretinide [N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide, 4-HPR] (10(-10)-10(-6) M) treatment of HT-29 human colon cancer cells for 24-72 h significantly inhibited their growth. Using HCT-15 cells, 4-HPR had limited inhibitory effects on cell proliferation over the same concentration range and time period. The inhibitory effects of 4-HPR on cell growth in HT-29 cells were markedly reduced in the presence of exogenously added prostaglandins (PGs), suggesting a possible role for inhibition of PG synthesis as a mechanism for 4-HPR's antiproliferative effects. Inhibition of PGE(2) production was caused by 4-HPR in a concentration-dependent manner and decreased COX-2 but not COX-1 mRNA levels; this is the first indication that 4-HPR selectively inhibits COX-2 gene expression. Our findings suggest a possible mechanism for the chemopreventive and anti-proliferative effects of 4-HPR.

Topology of hepatic mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase I.

Our earlier work using intact mitochondria and isolated mitochondrial outer membranes confirms the observations of Murthy and Pande that CPT-I is located on the mitochondrial outer membranes and supports the notion that this enzyme has a malonyl-CoA binding domain facing the cytosol and an acyl-CoA binding domain facing the inter membrane space. Our data also suggests that coenzyme A binds at the active site of CPT-I, as does acyl-CoA, 2-bromopalmitoyl-CoA, and (+)-hemipalmitoylcarnitinium, but malonyl-CoA does not bind at that site. Inhibition of CPT-I at the malonyl-CoA binding site by HPG and Ro 25-0187, which have no CoA moiety, contributes to a resolution of this question in that the CoA itself is not essential for the binding of malonyl-CoA to its regulatory site, but the dicarbonyl function which is present in malonyl-CoA, HPG, and Ro 25-0187 is absolutely essential. Our re-evaluation of the topology of hepatic mitochondrial CPT-I confirms the original observations that this enzyme has at least two different binding domains, one domain binding malonyl-CoA, HPG, and Ro-25-187 and the other domain binding acyl-CoA and other inhibitors of CPT-I. Furthermore, the malonyl-CoA binding domain is exposed to the cytosolic face of the membrane. Our data showing that treatment of the intact mitochondria with trypsin causes release of adenylate kinase which indicates that trypsin has damaged the mitochondrial outer membrane, possibly allowing trypsin to enter the intermembrane space and act on CPT from within the outer membrane. Since trypsin's action is limited to arginine and lysine residues, an alternative explanation could be that the portion of the protein domain responsible for malonyl-CoA inhibition may not contain these residues. The latter explanation is plausible, since malonyl-CoA was able to protect against loss of activity and sensitivity to inhibition, but did not protect against loss of adenylate kinase, suggesting that rupture of the outer membrane is not necessarily related to loss of CPT activity. These results suggest that some protein domain that is necessary for CPT activity is exposed on the outer surface of the outer membranes. Therefore, it seems likely that trypsin would have to be able to hydrolyse protein domains of CPT that are inaccessible to Nagarse and papain.

The effect of leukotrienes B and selected HETEs on the proliferation of colon cancer cells.

Eicosanoids have been implicated in colon carcinogenesis, but very little is known on the potential role of leukotrienes (LTs) and hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (HETEs) in this process; such compounds are produced by colonocytes and tumor infiltrating leukocytes. We studied the effect of LTB4, LTB4 methyl ester, LTB5, 12(R)-HETE, 12(S)-HETE and 15(S)-HETE (10(-10), 10(-8), 10(-6) M) on the proliferation rate, the cell cycle distribution, and the rate of apoptosis in HT-29 and HCT-15 human colon carcinoma cells. Our data show that LTB4, a lipoxygenase product, increased the proliferation rate of both cell lines in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. In HT-29 cells the concentration-response curve was bell-shaped (maximal effect at 10(-8) M). The proliferative effects of LTB4 in HT-29 cells were inhibited by SC-41930, a competitive antagonist of LTB4, suggesting the existence of an LTB4 receptor in epithelial cells. The methyl ester of LTB4 stimulated the proliferation of these cells, but LTB5, an isomer of LTB4 derived from eicosapentaenoic acid, did not. Of the HETEs, only 12(R)-HETE, a P-450 product, stimulated the proliferation of both cell lines; the other HETEs, all lipoxygenase products, failed to affect the proliferation of these cells. None of these eicosanoids had any effect on cell cycle distribution or apoptosis in either cell line. Taken together with our previous data showing that PGs stimulate colon cancer cell proliferation (Qiao et al. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1258, 215-223), these findings indicate that arachidonic acid products synthesized via at least three different pathways (cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase, P-450) may not be able to modulate the growth of colon cancer, and suggest a potential role in human colon carcinogenesis for LTB4 and 12(R)-HETE.

Comparative effects of omeprazole on xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the rat and human.

Omeprazole induces CYP1A in the human liver and gut, which has led to concern about possible side effects. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of omeprazole on phase 1 and phase 2 enzymes in the rat and human. Male rats were treated with intraperitoneal (40 or 80 mg/kg) or oral omeprazole (40 mg/kg) for 5 or 14 days, respectively. The activities and amounts of CYP1A, uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase, and glutathione transferase were determined in liver and gut. Enzyme activities were also determined in duodenal biopsy specimens from six healthy human volunteers before and after treatment with omeprazole (20 mg/day) for 10 days. Treatment with intraperitoneal omeprazole (40 mg/kg; 80 mg/kg) coinduced uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (36%; 66%), glutathione transferase (22%; 50%), and CYP1A (26%; 50%) in rat liver. In rat small intestine, comparable levels of induction were observed for uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase and glutathione transferase; CYP1A was unaffected. Oral omeprazole had similar effects. Immunoblotting showed corresponding changes in the amounts of these enzymes. Omeprazole increased the activities of CYP1A (19% to 167%; p = 0.014) and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (11% to 68%; p = 0.04) in the duodenal biopsy specimens of all six human volunteers; glutathione transferase was unaffected. Thus, omeprazole coinduced multiple xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the rat and human. The pattern of induction differed in the rat and human, consistent with known differences in genetic regulatory elements in the two species.

Insulin regulates enzyme activity, malonyl-CoA sensitivity and mRNA abundance of hepatic carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I.

The regulation of hepatic mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I (CPT-I) was studied in rats during starvation and insulin-dependent diabetes and in rat H4IIE cells. The Vmax. for CPT-I in hepatic mitochondrial outer membranes isolated from starved and diabetic rats increased 2- and 3-fold respectively over fed control values with no change in Km values for substrates. Regulation of malonyl-CoA sensitivity of CPT-I in isolated mitochondrial outer membranes was indicated by an 8-fold increase in Ki during starvation and by a 50-fold increase in Ki in the diabetic state. Peroxisomal and microsomal CPT also had decreased sensitivity to inhibition by malonyl-CoA during starvation. CPT-I mRNA abundance was 7.5 times greater in livers of 48-h-starved rats and 14.6 times greater in livers of insulin-dependent diabetic rats compared with livers of fed rats. In H4IIE cells, insulin increased CPT-I sensitivity to inhibition by malonyl-CoA in 4 h, and sensitivity continued to increase up to 24 h after insulin addition. CPT-I mRNA levels in H4IIE cells were decreased by insulin after 4 h and continued to decrease so that at 24 h there was a 10-fold difference. The half-life of CPT-I mRNA was 4 h in the presence of actinomycin D or with actinomycin D plus insulin. These results suggest that insulin regulates CPT-I by inhibiting transcription of the CPT-I gene.

Temperature effects on malonyl-CoA inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I.

Malonyl-CoA inhibition of hepatic mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase I and malonyl-CoA binding were measured at temperatures ranging from 0 degrees C to 37 degrees C. Protease treatment of mitochondria resulted in greatly diminished malonyl-CoA binding, indicating that the method used detected malonyl-CoA binding sites located on the outer surface of the mitochondrial outer membrane as expected. The apparent Ki for malonyl-CoA inhibition was found to increase with increasing temperature. Arrhenius plots for the initial velocity of the enzymatic reaction and for the Ki for malonyl-CoA both indicated a transition temperature between 20 and 25 degrees C with the transition for the malonyl-CoA interaction being more pronounced. Total specific binding of malonyl-CoA to mitochondrial proteins increased with increasing temperature, and Kd values decreased. The opposite effect of temperature on Kd values and Ki values was surprising because it was expected that these equilibrium constants would be identical. These observations indicate that Kd values for malonyl-CoA binding and Ki values for inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I by malonyl-CoA represent two significantly different binding phenomena. These data suggest that either: (a) malonyl-CoA binding measurements are unrelated to malonyl-CoA inhibition, or (b) inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I by malonyl-CoA involves more complex relationships than binding of malonyl-CoA to a single protein.

Lipid metabolism and membrane composition are altered in the brains of type II diabetic mice.

CBL/57 strain db/db mice exhibit type II (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes. The affected mice are markedly hyperinsulinemic, hyperglycemic, and hypercholesterolemic, and their serum K+ levels are decreased. The brains of the diabetic mice are significantly smaller than those of their lean, control littermates, but the protein concentration is normal. The low brain weight is accompanied by a loss of major fatty acid components within the whole brain, nerve endings, and mitochondrial membranes. Cholesterol levels are low in whole brain but are not significantly different from normal in the synaptosomal membranes. The phospholipid concentration is significantly decreased in whole brain homogenates, crude synaptosomal membranes, and crude mitochondrial membranes of the diabetic mice. In addition, the specific activities of membrane-bound synaptosomal acetylcholinesterase, Na+,K(+)-ATPase, and Mg(2+)-ATPase are decreased in crude synaptosomal membranes of the diabetic mice. The specific activities of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I and carnitine acetyltransferase are significantly increased in the crude mitochondrial fraction isolated from the brains of the type II diabetic mice, whereas the specific activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex is decreased. The specific activities of two other mitochondrial enzymes--monoamine oxidase B and citrate synthase--and a cytosolic enzyme--lactate dehydrogenase--are unaltered. The ability to synthesize cyclic AMP is markedly decreased in the brains of the diabetic mice. The concentrations of carnitine and of the amino acids, glutamate, aspartate, glutamine, and serine are unaltered, whereas glycine levels are significantly elevated in the brains of the db/db mice. The data suggest that in vivo the brains of the diabetic mice exhibit a decreased capacity for glucose oxidation and increased capacity for fatty acid oxidation. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that cerebral mitochondria isolated from the db/db mice oxidize [1-14C]palmitate to 14CO2 at a rate almost twice that of control mitochondria. The present findings emphasize the potentially serious alteration of brain metabolism in uncontrolled type II diabetes.

Diabetes and proteolysis: effects on carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I and malonyl-CoA binding.

Malonyl-CoA binding and malonyl-CoA inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I (CPT-I) were measured in hepatic mitochondria from normal and diabetic rats and in protease-treated mitochondria from fed rats to test the hypothesis that proteolysis represents a mechanism by which diabetes produces changes in the sensitivity of CPT-I to inhibition by malonyl-CoA. As in diabetes, protease treatment increased the apparent Ki values for malonyl-CoA. Palmitoyl-CoA greatly diminished malonyl-CoA specific binding in the mitochondrial system being studied, suggesting strong competition at the malonyl-CoA binding site. Proteolysis decreased capacity for specific binding of malonyl-CoA by 60-80%, but it had no effect on binding affinity. In contrast, the decreased specific binding of malonyl-CoA seen in the diabetic state is accompanied by increased binding affinity. Furthermore, observed Kd values differed from Ki values by a factor of 10 or more, suggesting that measured Kd and Ki may represent different ligand-protein complexes. These data suggest that alterations in inhibition of CPT-I by malonyl-CoA occurring in the diabetic state may involve mechanisms other than simple proteolytic removal of malonyl-CoA binding sites.

Regulation of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase expression by phenolic antioxidants.

Dietary antioxidants protect laboratory animals against the induction of tumors by a variety of chemical carcinogens. Among possible mechanisms, protection against chemical carcinogenesis could be mediated via antioxidant-dependent induction of detoxifying enzymes. Therefore, we investigated the effects of two commonly used food preservatives, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), on the expression of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms in rat liver. Male Wistar rats were fed a control diet or diets containing BHA (0.75%) or BHT (0.5%) for 2 weeks. BHT and BHA increased UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activities in liver microsomes for p-nitrophenol (236 and 218%, respectively), 3-hydroxybenzo(a)pyrene (246 and 175%, respectively), and androsterone (269 and 152%, respectively). Immunoblots showed changes in the amounts of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms corresponding to the changes in enzyme activities. Northern blot analysis showed that the concentration of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase mRNA paralleled the concentration of enzyme proteins and their respective levels of enzyme activity. BHT, for example, caused about a 250% increase in mRNA using a probe that recognizes the common 3'-domain of bilirubin/phenol UDP-glucuronosyltransferase mRNAs. In addition to inducing hepatic enzyme activities, BHT and BHA increased the activity of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase in the small intestine and kidney.

Differential induction of glutathione S-transferase in rat aorta versus liver.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, cigarette smoke components that induce atherosclerosis in animals, require metabolic biotransformation to electrophilic intermediates to exhibit atherogenic effects. The formation of reactive metabolites depends on both rates of cytochrome P450-catalyzed oxidation and rates of detoxification through conjugation with glutathione. Thus, changes in the activity of glutathione S-transferase in vascular tissue could affect the risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced atherogenesis. We compared the effects of several exogenous chemicals on levels of glutathione S-transferase in aorta and liver. Male Wistar rats were treated with 3-methylcholanthrene, a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, phenobarbital and butylated hydroxytoluene, an antioxidant known to have anti-atherogenic properties. In control animals, glutathione S-transferase activity was about 20-fold greater in liver than in aorta. Subunit expression was tissue specific. GST-Yp, for example, was the most abundant subunit in aorta but was undetectable in liver. In contrast, GST-Ya was barely detectable in aorta but was abundant in liver. Each of the xenobiotics caused induction of glutathione S-transferase but the extent of induction was greater in liver than in aorta. Phenobarbital, for example, caused 300% induction in liver but only 70% induction in aorta. By western blot analysis, differences in amounts of enzyme subunits corresponded to changes in enzyme activity. Thus, exogenous chemicals differentially regulate levels of glutathione S-transferase in the aorta and liver.

Hepatic carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I has two independent inhibitory binding sites for regulation of fatty acid oxidation.

Partial proteolysis of carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT-I) in intact mitochondria results in greatly diminished sensitivity to inhibition by its physiological inhibitor, malonyl-CoA, but inhibition by succinyl-CoA and methylmalonyl-CoA was affected to a lesser extent, whereas inhibition by coenzyme A, acetyl-CoA, and propionyl-CoA was not affected at all by proteinase treatment. These data suggested that inhibitors that are coenzyme A esters of short-chain dicarboxylic acids bind to a regulatory malonyl-CoA binding site located on the cytoplasmic face of the mitochondrial outer membrane while coenzyme A esters of monocarboxylic acids and free coenzyme A act at the active site in the mitochondrial intermembrane space. All inhibitors whose potency was altered by proteinase action provided protection against proteinases, whereas other inhibitors did not. Preincubation with the substrates carnitine, palmitoyl-CoA, or coenzyme A prior to proteolysis showed no protective effects against the loss of inhibition or loss of activity; however, preincubation with these substrates enhanced proteinase effects to more seriously diminish activity and inhibition by malonyl-CoA. Proteinases were also found to act on purified mitochondrial outer membranes to reduce inhibition by malonyl-CoA with little effect on activity. Using these outer membrane preparations it was found that the very potent inhibition of CPT-I by the active-site-directed substrate analog (+)-hemipalmitoylcarnitinium was not altered by proteinase treatment; however, inhibition by the malonyl-CoA analog Ro 25-0187, which is a more potent inhibitor than malonyl-CoA, was drastically reduced by proteinase treatment of mitochondrial outer membranes, confirming the different locations for the malonyl-CoA site and the active site. Coenzyme A and malonyl-CoA both act as competitive inhibitors with respect to the acyl-CoA substrate, but coenzyme A lacks cooperative effects seen with malonyl-CoA. For ligand binding to the malonyl-CoA regulatory site, there appears to be a requirement for two carbonyl groups in close juxtaposition, but there is apparently no requirement for the coenzyme A moiety per se. Current evidence, including the recently deduced primary structure for CPT-I, favors the hypothesis that (a) inhibitors of CPT-I may act at two distinct sites, (b) malonyl-CoA binds primarily to a regulatory site that is distinct from the active site of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I, and (c) the two inhibitory sites are located on opposite sides of the mitochondrial outer membrane.

Yonetani-Theorell analysis of hepatic carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I inhibition indicates two distinct inhibitory binding sites.

Analysis of inhibitor studies indicates that carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I has two separate sites for inhibitor binding. One site is located on the cytoplasmic side of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Malonyl-CoA, the most important physiological inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I, binds primarily to this site, but it can also bind to another site. A second inhibitory site is located at the active site of carnitine palmitolytransferase-I. Coenzyme A, a product/inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I binds primarily at this site and can inhibit carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I at physiological concentrations, but can also attenuate malonyl-CoA inhibition. Analogs of malonyl-CoA and other simpler compounds containing two carbonyl groups but no coenzyme A moiety inhibit only at the cytoplasmic site, indicating that this site has an absolute requirement for two carbonyl groups but has no absolute requirement for a coenzyme A moiety. Inhibitors acting through the active site included the active-site-directed inhibitor (+)-hemipalmitoylcarnitinium. These studies support the existence of two regulatory binding sites for the control of hepatic fatty acid oxidation: (a) the active site, for regulation by the inhibitory binding of coenzyme A and acetyl-CoA, and (b) a separate regulatory malonyl-CoA-binding site that is physical separated from the active site.

Proteinase treatment of intact hepatic mitochondria has differential effects on inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase by different inhibitors.

Proteolysis of intact mitochondria by Nagarse (subtilisin BPN') and papain resulted in limited loss of activity of the outer-membrane carnitine palmitoyltransferase, but much greater loss of sensitivity to inhibition by malonyl-CoA. In contrast with a previous report [Murthy & Pande (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 378-382], we found that trypsin had no effect on malonyl-CoA sensitivity. Even when 80% of activity was destroyed by trypsin, there was no difference in the malonyl-CoA sensitivity of the enzyme remaining. Trypsin caused release of the intermembrane-space enzyme adenylate kinase, indicating loss of integrity of the mitochondrial outer membrane, whereas Nagarse and papain caused no release of that enzyme. Citrate synthase was not released by any of the three proteinases, indicating no damage to the mitochondrial inner membrane. When we examined the effects of proteolysis on the inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase by a wide variety of inhibitors having different mechanisms of inhibition, we found differential proteolytic effects that were specific for those inhibitors (malonyl-CoA and hydroxyphenylglyoxylate) that have their inhibitory potencies diminished by changes in physiological state. Both of those inhibitors protected carnitine palmitoyltransferase from the effects of proteolysis, but did not inhibit the proteinases directly. Inhibition by two other inhibitors (DL-2-bromopalmitoyl-CoA and N-benzyladriamycin 14-valerate) was not altered by proteinase treatment, even when most of the enzyme activity had been destroyed. Inhibition by glyburide, which is minimally affected by physiological state, was affected only to a slight extent at the highest concentration of trypsin tested. Proteolysis by Nagarse appeared to produce loss of co-operativity in malonyl-CoA inhibition. The effects of proteolysis are discussed and compared with changes in Ki occurring with changing physiological states.