Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Phys J C Part Fields ; 84(3): 241, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38463614

ABSTRACT

Machine learning-based anomaly detection (AD) methods are promising tools for extending the coverage of searches for physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). One class of AD methods that has received significant attention is resonant anomaly detection, where the BSM physics is assumed to be localized in at least one known variable. While there have been many methods proposed to identify such a BSM signal that make use of simulated or detected data in different ways, there has not yet been a study of the methods' complementarity. To this end, we address two questions. First, in the absence of any signal, do different methods pick the same events as signal-like? If not, then we can significantly reduce the false-positive rate by comparing different methods on the same dataset. Second, if there is a signal, are different methods fully correlated? Even if their maximum performance is the same, since we do not know how much signal is present, it may be beneficial to combine approaches. Using the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Olympics dataset, we provide quantitative answers to these questions. We find that there are significant gains possible by combining multiple methods, which will strengthen the search program at the LHC and beyond.

2.
Rep Prog Phys ; 84(12)2021 12 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34736231

ABSTRACT

A new paradigm for data-driven, model-agnostic new physics searches at colliders is emerging, and aims to leverage recent breakthroughs in anomaly detection and machine learning. In order to develop and benchmark new anomaly detection methods within this framework, it is essential to have standard datasets. To this end, we have created the LHC Olympics 2020, a community challenge accompanied by a set of simulated collider events. Participants in these Olympics have developed their methods using an R&D dataset and then tested them on black boxes: datasets with an unknown anomaly (or not). Methods made use of modern machine learning tools and were based on unsupervised learning (autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, normalizing flows), weakly supervised learning, and semi-supervised learning. This paper will review the LHC Olympics 2020 challenge, including an overview of the competition, a description of methods deployed in the competition, lessons learned from the experience, and implications for data analyses with future datasets as well as future colliders.


Subject(s)
Machine Learning , Supervised Machine Learning , Humans , Physical Phenomena , Physics
3.
Phys Rev Lett ; 125(12): 122001, 2020 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33016758

ABSTRACT

While deep learning has proven to be extremely successful at supervised classification tasks at the LHC and beyond, for practical applications, raw classification accuracy is often not the only consideration. One crucial issue is the stability of network predictions, either versus changes of individual features of the input data or against systematic perturbations. We present a new method based on a novel application of "distance correlation," a measure quantifying nonlinear correlations, that achieves equal performance to state-of-the-art adversarial decorrelation networks but is much simpler and more stable to train. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, we carefully recast a recent ATLAS study of decorrelation methods as applied to boosted, hadronic W tagging. We also show the feasibility of regularization with distance correlation for more powerful convolutional neural networks, as well as for the problem of hadronic top tagging.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...