Intra-articular steroid hip injection for osteoarthritis: a survey of orthopedic surgeons in Ontario.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular steroid hip injection (IASHI) has been prescribed for painful hip arthritis since the 1950s, but with advances in medical and surgical management its role is less certain today. There are very few published data on the utility or prescribing patterns of IASHI. METHODS: We developed a questionnaire to seek expert opinion on IASHI that we distributed to practising Ontario-based members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. We systematically describe the current practices and expert opinion of 99 hip surgeons (73% response rate), focusing on indications, current use and complications experienced with IASHI. RESULTS: Only 56% of surgeons felt that IASHI was therapeutically useful, with 72% of surgeons estimating that 60% or less of their patients achieved even transient benefit from IASHI. One-quarter of the surgeons believe that IASHI accelerates arthritis progression, most of whom had stated that it would be no great loss if IASHI was no longer available. Nineteen percent of the surgeons believed that the infection rate related to total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be increased after IASHI, and this was associated with fewer IASHIs ordered per year, compared with the number prescribed by those who did not feel that infection rates would increase. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic collection of expert opinions demonstrates that substantial numbers of surgeons felt that, in their patients, IASHI was not therapeutically helpful, may accelerate arthritis progression or may cause increased infectious complications after subsequent THA.

Tensile failure of C2 pedicles and of subsequent direct repair in a porcine model.

STUDY DESIGN: This repeated-measures biomechanical study evaluated the tensile force required to cause bipedicular (hangman's) fractures in isolated porcine C2 specimens, and the subsequent force to failure after direct fracture repair with bipedicular lag screws. OBJECTIVES: To assess the pullout strength of direct lag screw fixation of hangman's fracture, relative to the strength of the intact specimens. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have reported successful treatment of hangman's fractures by direct screw repair followed by a collar after surgery. However, to the authors' best knowledge, there has not yet been a biomechanical analysis of the force required for screw pullout after direct repair. METHODS: Of 60 mounted porcine C2 specimens subjected to tensile anteroposterior force, hangman's fracture occurred in 15 cases, 12 of which were fixed with bipedicular 4.0-mm lag screws. These fixed specimens were retested to failure in the same manner. RESULTS: Most specimens had laminar fractures after the application of tensile force, with 15 of 60 (25%) showing bipedicular fractures. The force to bipedicular failure was 3259.1 +/- 148.5 N (mean +/- standard error of the mean). After screw fixation, the force to failure of the same specimens was 882.0 +/- 108.5 N (mean +/- standard error of the mean), or 27.3% of the intact bone. CONCLUSIONS: The pullout strength was substantial (882 N), although the relative strength of fixation was only 27.3% of the fracture strength shown by the intact specimens. The findings are discussed in relation to previous studies. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first study to examine screw pullout forces after direct repair of hangman's fracture.