ABSTRACT
The assessment of ricinoleic acid (RA) incorporated into polymeric nanoparticles is a challenge that has not yet been explored. This bioactive compound, the main component of castor oil, has attracted attention in the pharmaceutical field for its valuable anti-inflammatory, antifungal, and antimicrobial properties. This work aims to develop a new and simple analytical method using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) for the identification and quantification of ricinoleic acid, with potential applicability in several other complex systems. The method was validated through analytical parameters, such as linearity, limit of detection and quantification, accuracy, precision, selectivity, and robustness. The physicochemical properties of the nanocapsules were characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS) to determine their hydrodynamic mean diameter, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (ZP), via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and quantifying the encapsulation efficiency. The proposed analytical method utilized a mobile phase consisting of a 65:35 ratio of acetonitrile to water, acidified with 1.5% phosphoric acid. It successfully depicted a symmetric peak of ricinoleic acid (retention time of 7.5 min) for both the standard and the RA present in the polymeric nanoparticles, enabling the quantification of the drug loaded into the nanocapsules. The nanocapsules containing ricinoleic acid (RA) exhibited an approximate size ranging from 309 nm to 441 nm, a PDI lower than 0.2, ζ values of approximately -30 mV, and high encapsulation efficiency (~99%). Overall, the developed HPLC-DAD procedure provides adequate confidence for the identification and quantification of ricinoleic acid in PLGA nanocapsules and other complex matrices.
ABSTRACT
The objective of this research was to develop and validate analytical methods for quantitative determination of fluoroquinolones of third generation. Simple and rapid chromatographic method was developed and validated for quantitative determination of four quinolone antibiotics in tablets and injection preparations. The fluoroquinolones studied were gatifloxacin (GAT), levofloxacin (LEV), lomefloxacin (LOM) and pefloxacin (PEF). The quinolones were analyzed by using a LiChrospher 100 RP-18 column (5 microm, 125 mm x 4 mm) and a mobile phase constituted of water:acetonitrile (80:20, v/v) with 0.3% of triethylamine and pH adjusted to 3.3 with phosphoric acid. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the analyses were performed using UV detector with wavelengths varying from 279 to 295 nm. The analyses were performed at room temperature (24 +/- 2 degrees C). All fluoroquinolones were separated within 5 min. The calibration curves were linear (r>or=0.9999) over a concentration range from 4.0 to 24.0 microg/mL. The relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) was < 1.0% and average recovery was above 99.54%.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical/methods , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Fluoroquinolones/analysis , Levofloxacin , Ofloxacin/analysis , Pefloxacin/analysis , Quinolones/analysis , Calibration , Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/methods , Chromatography , Ethylamines/analysis , Gatifloxacin , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Models, Chemical , Models, Statistical , Pharmaceutical Preparations/analysis , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet/methods , Tablets , Temperature , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The aim of this research was to standardize a high-performance liquid chromatographic method for quantitative determination of steroid hormones, like ethinylestradiol (ETE), levonorgestrel (LEVO), and gestodene (GEST), in commercially available oral contraceptives (OCs). The combination ETE-LEVO was analyzed using a LiChrospher 100 RP-8 column (5 microns, 125 x 4 mm) in LiChroCART, with a mobile phase constituted of acetonitrile: water (60:40 v/v). Using the same column, ETE-GEST was analyzed with a mobile phase constituted of acetonitrile:water (50:50 v/v) at pH 7.5 adjusted with 0.02 M ammonium hydroxide. For both methods, a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min was utilized and detection was carried out at 215 nm. All analyses were performed at room temperature (24 +/- 2 degrees C). Calibration curves for ETE-LEVO were obtained using solutions with concentration ranges from 2.40 to 60.0 micrograms/mL (ETE), and from 12.0 to 300.0 micrograms/mL (LEVO). Calibration curves for ETE-GEST were obtained using solutions with concentration ranges from 2.40 to 60.0 micrograms/mL (ETE), and from 9.0 to 160.0 micrograms/mL (GEST). Correlation coefficients obtained were from 0.9999 to 0.9990. Coefficients of variation for samples containing ETE-LEVO were 0.47% and 0.38%, respectively. For samples with ETE-GEST they were 0.39% and 0.44%, respectively. The average recovery for samples with ETE-LEVO was 103.46% and 100.78%, respectively. For samples containing ETE-GEST it was 100.89% and 101.03%, respectively.