Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(9)2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731174

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronary bifurcation lesions are commonly encountered during coronary angiography. The management of bifurcation lesions remains challenging, with various bifurcation techniques being available and outcomes varying depending on the Medina classification and operator experience. Methods: We present a short case series and the outcomes of a new bifurcation technique for the management of simple Medina '0,0,1' and '0,0,1' bifurcation lesions using the kissing balloon-stent technique (kissing BS). Results: We retrospectively identified 8 patients who underwent bifurcation stenting using the kissing Balloon-Stent technique, along with their clinical and angiographic follow-up outcomes. We also describe the benefits and limitations of the technique, delineate the potential mechanisms of target lesion failure, and outline appropriate patient selection. Conclusions: Kissing Balloon-Stent technique is a simple single stent technique that is safe and feasible in select patients with Medina '0,0,1' and '0,0,1' bifurcation lesions.

2.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J ; 19(1): 55-60, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37600449

ABSTRACT

We report a case of recurrent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to a previously implanted under-expanded stent with in-stent thrombosis refractory to traditional interventional techniques. We underscore the utility of bail-out shockwave intravascular lithotripsy to tackle previously under-expanded stents in this acute setting.


Subject(s)
Lithotripsy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Stents , Lithotripsy/adverse effects
4.
J Clin Med ; 11(14)2022 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35887912

ABSTRACT

Sympathetic nervous system activation in patients with heart failure is one of the main pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with the worse outcomes. Pharmacotherapies targeting neurohormonal activation have been at the center of heart failure management. Despite the advancement of therapies and the available treatments, heart failure continues to have an overall poor prognosis. Renal denervation was originally developed to lower systemic blood pressure in patients with poorly controlled hypertension, by modulating sympathetic outflow. However, more recently, multiple studies have investigated the effect of renal denervation in heart failure patients with both preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fractions (HFrEF). This paper provides an overview of the potential effect of renal denervation in altering the various pathophysiologic, sympathetically mediated pathways that contribute to heart failure, and reviews the literature that supports its future use in those patients.

5.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 44: 10-13, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35779995

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has been well characterized as a safe and effective method for plaque modification in the treatment of de-novo, calcific coronary artery disease. In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major challenge in coronary revascularization, especially "multilayer" ISR. The use of IVL in ISR remains off-label and has been described in case reports and small case series. We report the single-center experience using IVL for the treatment of ISR, including multilayer ISR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study. All intracoronary percutaneous interventions requiring lithotripsy use, between May 2021 and December 2021, were reviewed. We selected only the cases involving IVL use for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Baseline characteristics of patients were obtained from chart review. Procedural details and outcomes were obtained from reports and from a detailed review of procedural images. RESULTS: A total of 13 ISR lesions were treated with IVL, of which 5 were in cases of multilayer ISR. Procedural success was observed in 11 lesions. Three patients had recurrent angina during a mean follow-up of 133 days. None of the patients had hard outcomes of myocardial infarction or cardiac death during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: IVL is feasible and safe for ISR treatment including multilayer ISR. IVL is associated with good immediate procedural success, and a low rate of short-term adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Coronary Restenosis , Lithotripsy , Humans , Coronary Restenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Restenosis/etiology , Coronary Restenosis/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Constriction, Pathologic , Stents/adverse effects
6.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 42: 17-25, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35398009

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of temporary-permanent pacemaker (TPP) in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We also sought to identify key predictors of permanent pacemaker (PPM) within 30 days of TAVR in this population. BACKGROUND: RBBB is a well-recognized risk factor for PPM post TAVR. TPP provides stable transient pacing and reduces the need for critical care beds. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 371 patients who underwent TAVR at our institution. All patients with pre-existing RBBB had TPP placed prior to TAVR (n = 37). The primary outcome was the need for critical care beds. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of PPM within 30 days of TAVR. RESULTS: 67 patients required PPM within 30 days of TAVR, and 56 implanted before discharge. 51% (19 out of 37) of TPP group required PPM before discharge compared to 11% (37 out of 334) of No TPP (p < 0.001), yet TPP group spent significantly fewer hours in a critical care bed (19 vs 28 h, p = 0.01). Length of membranous septum (LMS) <8.49 mm was the strongest independent predictor of PPM within 30 days of TAVR (RAUC of 0.80, Sensitivity 0.7 and Specificity 0.8) and 98% of patients with LMS < 7 mm required PPM within 30 days. CONCLUSION: TPP-TAVR is a well-defined multidisciplinary protocol that reduces the need for critical care beds in patients with pre-existing RBBB referred for TAVR. Additionally, LMS is the strongest predictor of PPM implantation in this population. CONDENSED ABSTRACT (100 WORDS): This study evaluated the use of temporary-permanent pacemakers (TPP) in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). TPP-TAVR provided stable pacing allowing for early mobilization and reduced the need for critical care beds. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified length of membranous septum (LMS) <8.49 mm in patients with RBBB as the strongest independent predictor of PPM need within 30 days of TAVR. 98% of patients with RBBB and LMS < 7 mm required PPM at 30 days regardless of other characteristics including valve type and size.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Bundle-Branch Block/diagnosis , Bundle-Branch Block/etiology , Bundle-Branch Block/therapy , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/adverse effects , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
7.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 20(3): 215-222, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35341445

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery perforation is a serious complication during percutaneous coronary intervention that results in significant increase in morbidity and mortality. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art overview of the contemporary management of coronary perforation and the possible scenarios that operators may run into during percutaneous coronary interventions. AREA COVERED: Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify the most recently published articles covering this topic. EXPERT OPINION: As part of this review, we also provide an expert commentary discussing the nuances in the recognition and management of coronary artery perforation, in addition to future directions, and improvements in technology that could make the management of coronary perforation safer and more effective.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Injuries , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Vascular System Injuries , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/surgery , Heart Injuries/etiology , Heart Injuries/therapy , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Stents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vascular System Injuries/etiology , Vascular System Injuries/therapy
8.
Am J Cardiol ; 151: 114-117, 2021 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052015

ABSTRACT

With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, resources have been reallocated and elective cases have been deferred to minimize the spread of the disease, altering the workflow of cardiac catheterization laboratories across the country. This has in turn affected the training experience of cardiology fellows, including diminished procedure numbers and a narrow breadth of cases as they approach the end of their training before joining independent practice. It has also taken a toll on the emotional well-being of fellows as they see their colleagues, loved ones, patients or even themselves struggling with COVID-19, with some succumbing to it. The aim of this opinion piece is to focus attention on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellows and their training, challenges faced as they transition to practicing in the real world in the near future and share the lessons learned thus far. We believe that this is an important contribution and would be of interest not only to cardiology fellows-in-training and cardiologists but also trainees in other procedural specialties.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiology/education , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Pandemics , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...