Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 25(3): 616-623, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36303084

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine the associations between acculturation, dental anxiety, and dental utilization among Hispanics/Latinos living in the US. A proxy measure of dental anxiety was available for 7539 adults who had not visited a dentist within the last year. All completed the Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (SASH). Bivariate logistic regression and adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted. Approximately 22% of the sample was dentally anxious. Dental anxiety was significantly associated with SASH language scale score (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.02, 1.18, p = 0.04), years in US (OR 1.53, 95%CI 1.23, 1.91, p < 0.0001), and preferred Spanish language (OR 1.30, 95%CI 1.05, 1.63, p = 0.0192); lower acculturation corresponded to higher dental anxiety. Adjusting for sex, age, education, income, insurance, and oral health status, level of acculturation was associated with dental anxiety (AOR 0.87, 95%CI 0.75, 0.91, p = 0.009), but neither were associated with utilization. Acculturation may be an important predictor of dental anxiety for Hispanics/Latinos living in the US.


Subject(s)
Acculturation , Public Health , Adult , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Hispanic or Latino , Anxiety , Dental Care
2.
J Dent Res ; 96(3): 277-284, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28081371

ABSTRACT

Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by pain and reduced function in the temporomandibular joint and/or associated masticatory musculature. Prevalence in the United States is 5% and twice as high among women as men. We conducted a discovery genome-wide association study (GWAS) of TMD in 10,153 participants (769 cases, 9,384 controls) of the US Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). The most promising single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were tested in meta-analysis of 4 independent cohorts. One replication cohort was from the United States, and the others were from Germany, Finland, and Brazil, totaling 1,911 TMD cases and 6,903 controls. A locus near the sarcoglycan alpha ( SGCA), rs4794106, was suggestive in the discovery analysis ( P = 2.6 × 106) and replicated (i.e., 1-tailed P = 0.016) in the Brazilian cohort. In the discovery cohort, sex-stratified analysis identified 2 additional genome-wide significant loci in females. One lying upstream of the relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 2 ( RXP2) (chromosome 13, rs60249166, odds ratio [OR] = 0.65, P = 3.6 × 10-8) was replicated among females in the meta-analysis (1-tailed P = 0.052). The other (chromosome 17, rs1531554, OR = 0.68, P = 2.9 × 10-8) was replicated among females (1-tailed P = 0.002), as well as replicated in meta-analysis of both sexes (1-tailed P = 0.021). A novel locus at genome-wide level of significance (rs73460075, OR = 0.56, P = 3.8 × 10-8) in the intron of the dystrophin gene DMD (X chromosome), and a suggestive locus on chromosome 7 (rs73271865, P = 2.9 × 10-7) upstream of the Sp4 Transcription Factor ( SP4) gene were identified in the discovery cohort, but neither of these was replicated. The SGCA gene encodes SGCA, which is involved in the cellular structure of muscle fibers and, along with DMD, forms part of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex. Functional annotation suggested that several of these variants reside in loci that regulate processes relevant to TMD pathobiologic processes.


Subject(s)
Genome-Wide Association Study , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/genetics , Brazil/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Dystrophin , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Genetic Loci , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Germany/epidemiology , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Male , Phenotype , Prevalence , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled , Sarcoglycans , Sp4 Transcription Factor , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/epidemiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/ethnology , United States/epidemiology
3.
Int J Dent Hyg ; 14(4): 307-313, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26058748

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess oral cancer prevention and early detection curricula in Illinois associate-degree dental hygiene programmes and highlight global health applications. METHODS: An email invitation was sent to each Illinois associate-degree granting dental hygiene programme's oral cancer contact to participate in a survey via a SurveyMonkey™ link to a 21-item questionnaire. Questions elicited background information on each programme and inquired about curriculum and methods used for teaching oral cancer prevention and early detection. RESULTS: Eight of the 12 (67%) programmes responded. Three (37.5%) reported having a specific oral cancer curriculum. Five (62.5%) require students to perform examinations for signs and symptoms of oral cancer at each clinic visit. Variations exist across the programmes in the number of patients each student sees annually and the number of oral cancer examinations each student performs before graduation. Seven programmes (87.5%) conduct early detection screening in community settings. All programmes included risk assessment associated with tobacco. All other risk factors measured were treated inconsistently. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in training and experience were reported across Illinois dental hygiene programmes. Training is neither standardized nor uniformly comprehensive. Students' preparation for delivering prevention and early detection services to their patients could be strengthened to ensure competence including reflection of risk factors and behaviours in a global context. Regular review of curricular guidelines and programme content would help dental hygienists meet the expectations of the Crete Declaration on Oral Cancer Prevention.


Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms/prevention & control , Oral Hygiene/education , Curriculum , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Illinois/epidemiology , Male , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Program Evaluation , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J Public Health Dent ; 61(2): 114-9, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11474914

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A survey was conducted to better understand the training needs of faculty members without dental public health (DPH) specialty board certification who teach DPH to dental students. METHODS: An 11-item questionnaire was sent to 193 non-DPH diplomate faculty members at US dental schools who were dentists and at least one of the following: a member of the American Association of Dental Schools Community and Preventive Dentistry Section, a referral from an academic American Board of Dental Public Health diplomate, a DPH faculty listed on the school's Web pages, a DPH contact from the AADS Institutional Directory, or the school's dean if no other contact. RESULTS: A 70 percent response rate was obtained. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents taught at least one national board-related DPH topic. Among these faculty members, 67 percent have or are in training for the master of public health, 26 percent have completed or are in a DPH residency, and 63 percent desire training in one or more of the DPH topics. The majority (64%) does not plan to take the specialty exam, while 28 percent plan to take the exam within five years. About half reported no personal incentives to take the exam and 39 percent perceived no institutional incentives. CONCLUSIONS: These nondiplomate teachers of predoctoral DPH desire training, but appear to have barriers and perceive few benefits to achieving DPH board certification.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Certification , Faculty, Dental , Public Health Dentistry/education , Chi-Square Distribution , Community Dentistry/education , Cross-Sectional Studies , Curriculum , Education, Dental, Graduate , Educational Measurement , Humans , Internship and Residency , Motivation , Preventive Dentistry/education , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Staff Development , Statistics as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching
5.
Arch Environ Health ; 55(5): 336-46, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11063409

ABSTRACT

Latex hypersensitivity can pose a threat to anyone, but health-care providers are among the high-risk groups for developing latex hypersensitivity. Latex hypersensitivity likely results from health-care workers' increased use of gloves following implementation of universal precautions. It is also believed that the antigenic load of latex gloves causes an increase in latex hypersensitivity resulting from massive production of gloves. Although there are many studies on the prevalence of latex hypersensitivity among health-care workers, there appear to be discrepancies, which may affect the different apparent prevalence. Testing for latex hypersensitivity raises another problem. Latex allergens cannot be identified specifically; therefore, there is no standard test or testing solution that can identify hypersensitive persons. Although latex glove hypersensitivity was first identified in the late 1970s, there remain many uncertainties associated with it; as a result, there is a growing concern among health-care providers. The authors offer several precautions to avoid the development of latex hypersensitivity.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Latex Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Latex Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Latex Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Male , Occupational Health , Policy Making , Prevalence , Risk Factors , South Carolina/epidemiology
6.
J Public Health Dent ; 59(3): 198-200, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10649592

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to estimate and evaluate the prevalence for the United States of early childhood caries (ECC) among children 12 to 23 months of age. METHODS: The 1988-94 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) public-use data set was analyzed using SUDAAN. Two ECC case definitions were used. Definition #1 was restricted to the caries score called by the examiner. Definition #2 liberally included children identified by definition #1 and those possibly having questionable caries scores. RESULTS: The NHANES III six-year prevalence estimates of caries in the maxillary anterior incisors of children 12 to 23 months of age were 1.0 percent for definition #1 and 1.7 percent for definition #2. Mexican-American and economically disadvantaged children were disproportionally represented with ECC. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ECC among children 12 to 23 months of age is barely detectable at the national level. Alternative study designs and improved case definitions are needed for further advances in ECC.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/epidemiology , Chi-Square Distribution , DMF Index , Dental Caries/classification , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Incisor/pathology , Infant , Male , Maxilla , Mexican Americans/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology
7.
J Public Health Dent ; 58 Suppl 1: 94-100, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9661109

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the representation of academically based diplomates of the American Board of Dental Public Health (ABDPH) and to identify their perceptions on the training of dental public health predoctoral faculty. METHODS: Data were collected by a mailed, self-administered, 13-item questionnaire. The population was the 48 diplomates of the ABDPH as of March 1997 associated with academic institutions. RESULTS: Twenty of the 55 US dental schools had a diplomate of the ABDPH with a mean of 1.8 diplomates per school with a diplomate. An average of 4.5 full-time faculty members per school were associated with teaching dental public health. A master's degree in public health (MPH) was the most frequently suggested educational requirement for dental public health faculty. Continuing education courses were training needs perceived for dental public health faculty. The lack of time, money, and incentives, along with perceived rigidity of requirements for board certification, were reported as major barriers for faculty becoming dental public health board certified. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous challenges confront the development of a strong dental public health presence in US dental schools. These challenges include, among others, insufficient numbers of academic dental public health specialists and insufficient motivations to encourage promising candidates to pursue specialty status.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Certification , Faculty, Dental , Public Health Dentistry/education , Education, Dental, Continuing , Education, Dental, Graduate/standards , Faculty, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Motivation , Public Health Administration/education , Public Health Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Schools, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Staff Development , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching , Time Factors
8.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 26(1 Suppl): 117-9, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9671209

ABSTRACT

Early childhood caries (ECC) is among the most prevalent health problems of low-income infants and toddlers, yet little attention and few resources have been allocated to understanding this disease. Since dental caries in infants and toddlers cannot be exclusively ascribed to feeding practices, other concepts regarding its etiology and prevention need to be examined. Furthermore, the establishment of evidence-based policies regarding this basic health problem is critical for the dissemination of consistent standards of care to health care providers and government agencies. To accomplish these objectives, the scientific community, organizations concerned with children's health and the political process need to be energized to find resources and energy to solve this public health challenge.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/prevention & control , Child , Child Welfare , Child, Preschool , Community-Institutional Relations , Dental Care for Children , Dental Caries/etiology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Feeding Methods , Government Agencies , Health Care Rationing , Health Policy , Health Resources , Humans , Infant , Infant Welfare , Poverty , Prevalence
9.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 127(3): 335-43, 1996 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8819780

ABSTRACT

This article provides estimates of dental caries and dental sealant use among U.S. children and adolescents, obtained from Phase 1 (1988-1991) of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. More than 60 percent of children under the age of 10 years had a caries-free primary dentition; among children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years, about 55 percent had a caries-free permanent dentition. The highest percentages of dental caries among children and adolescents continue to be distributed disproportionally among about 25 percent of the U.S. population. Fewer than one in five U.S. children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years had one or more sealed permanent teeth.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/epidemiology , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Black People , Child , Child, Preschool , DMF Index , Dental Health Surveys , Dental Restoration, Permanent/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mexican Americans/statistics & numerical data , Tooth, Deciduous , United States/epidemiology , White People
10.
J Dent Res ; 75 Spec No: 631-41, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8594087

ABSTRACT

The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-Phase 1, conducted from 1988 to 1991 in the United States, included an assessment of dental caries in US children and adolescents and provided the opportunity for differences in dental caries status to be viewed by a ge, sex, race, and race-ethnicity. The measurement of dental caries in children and adolescents from 2-17 years of age included the number of decayed, missing, and filled permanent tooth surfaces and teeth, and the number of decayed, and filled primary tooth surfaces and teeth. Additionally, a brief visual inspection for the presence or absence of early childhood caries in the maxillary incisors was conducted for children 12-23 months of age. The survey yielded weighted estimates for 1988-1991 for over 58 million US children and adolescents 1 to 17 years of age. For infants aged 12-23 months, 0.8% were scored positive for early childhood caries. Over 60% (62.1%) of the children aged 2-9 years were caries-free in their primary dentition. Over half (54.7%) of the children 5-17 years were caries-free in their permanent dentition. The occurrence of caries in the permanent dentition is clustered: A quarter of the children and adolescents ages 5 to 17 with at least one permanent tooth accounted for about 80% of the caries experienced in permanent teeth. Differences in caries experience were found among race and race-ethnicity subpopulations, and caries patterns for the primary and permanent dentition were dissimilar. Further analyses are needed to explore other potential determinants of caries in children.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , DMF Index , Dental Caries/ethnology , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incisor , Infant , Male , Observer Variation , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Tooth, Deciduous , United States/epidemiology
11.
J Dent Res ; 75 Spec No: 642-51, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8594088

ABSTRACT

Dental public health policy planning requires accurate and current information about the extent of caries in the United States population. These data are available from the caries examination from Phase 1 of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which found that 94% of adults in the United States show evidence of past or present coronal caries. Among the dentate, the mean number of decayed and filled coronal surfaces per person was 21.5. Dentate females had a lower number of untreated coronal tooth surfaces with caries (1.5), but a higher mean number of treated and untreated surfaces per person (22.7) than males, with scores of 2.1 and 20.2, respectively. Estimates for race-ethnicity groups were standarized by age and gender to control for population differences among them. Dentate non-Hispanic blacks (11.9) and Mexican-Americans (14.1) had half the number of decayed and filled coronal surfaces as non-Hispanic whites (24.3), but more untreated surfaces (non-Hispanic whites, 1.5; non-Hispanic blacks, 3.4; Mexican-Americans, 2.8). Mexican-Americans were most likely to be dentate, had the highest average number of teeth, and had 25% fewer decayed, missing, and filled coronal surfaces (37.6) than non-Hispanic blacks (49.2) and non-Hispanic whites (51.0). Root caries affected 22.5% of the dentate population. Blacks had the most treated and untreated root surfaces with caries (1.6), close to the value for Mexican-Americans (1.4). The score for non-Hispanic whites was 1.1. Untreated root caries is most common in dentate non-Hispanic blacks (1.5), followed by Mexican-Americans (1.2), with non-Hispanic whites (0.6) having the fewest untreated carious root surfaces. Race-ethnicity groups were disparate with respect to dental caries; effort is needed to treat active caries common in some population subgroups.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Aged , Cluster Analysis , DMF Index , Dental Caries/ethnology , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Root Caries/epidemiology , Sampling Studies , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology
12.
J Dent Res ; 75 Spec No: 696-705, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8594093

ABSTRACT

Traumatic injuries to the teeth are among the most serious of dental conditions, yet little is known about the prevalence of tooth or dental trauma at the national level. The National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) modified existing indices for specific use in national epidemiologic studies of tooth trauma among both children and adults. The NIDR index was developed not only to track the status of the tooth from sound (no evidence of trauma) through missing due to trauma, but also to reflect selected sequelae of trauma. The index is based on clinical, non-radiographic evidence of tooth inujury and treatment received in the eight permanent incisors, including a positive history of injury obtained from the subject. The trauma assessment index was applied immediately following the caries examination for dentate participants ages 6-50 years old (n=7,707) in Phase 1 of the NHANES III oral examination. This article reports the first national overall and age-specific population-based prevalence of dental trauma among gender, racial, and ethnic groups. There is a higher prevalence of incisal trauma, of both maxillary and mandibular incisors, in males than females, in both the younger and older age groups. The prevalence of incisal trauma of both maxillary and mandibular incisors in whites and blacks in both younger and older age categories is similar. The study found that half of the individuals with trauma had only one incisor tooth classified as having trauma. Males and older age groups showed larger numbers of traumatized teeth. Further study and examination of methodological issues are desirable for additional understanding of incisal trauma in the general population .


Subject(s)
Incisor/injuries , Tooth Injuries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , DMF Index , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Observer Variation , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Tooth Injuries/ethnology , Trauma Severity Indices , United States/epidemiology
13.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 149(7): 786-91, 1995 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7795770

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide information on baby bottle use in the United States because of the important consequences, including early childhood caries, associated with inappropriate feeding practices. METHODS: Data from the child supplement to the 1991 National Health Interview Survey were examined. Information was collected on one randomly selected child from each family with children in the survey; data were weighted to represent the corresponding US population. Questions about the "ever use" and "still use" of baby bottles, and selected sociodemographic and health behavior variables were assessed. RESULTS: About 95% of children 6 months to 5 years old have ever used a baby bottle. Nearly one fifth of the children in this age range were put to bed with a bottle that had contents other than water. More than 8% of children 2 to 5 years old still use the bottle. Bivariate and multivariate analyses showed differences in bottle practices by education level of the adult caretaker, dental visits, Hispanic background, race, and geographic region. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of feeding with a baby bottle requires pediatricians and other health care professionals to help reduce the risks to health.


Subject(s)
Bottle Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Bottle Feeding/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Ethnicity , Feeding Behavior , Humans , Infant , Logistic Models , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
14.
J Public Health Dent ; 55(1): 28-33, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7776288

ABSTRACT

The homeless are a diverse group who present the dental profession with a number of difficult challenges in the delivery of oral health services. Utilization of dental services by the homeless is low when provided in traditional settings and access is limited. The purpose of this case study is to review program planning issues focusing on the unique aspects of establishing dental programs for the shelter-based homeless. This paper is based on experiences in developing a dental program for homeless persons in Boston. The establishment of a portable dental program in 1988 for persons residing in shelters in the greater Boston area involved many administrative and clinical considerations. These factors included determination of needs and barriers to dental care, resource identification and development, program planning and implementation, evaluation, and the development of constituency support. The diversity of the homeless population in combination with the variation of space and medical resources at different shelter sites dictates flexibility in the development of programs to address the oral health needs of the homeless.


Subject(s)
Dental Health Services , Ill-Housed Persons , Adult , Boston , Child , Dental Equipment , Dental Health Services/organization & administration , Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Dental Staff , Female , Health Planning , Health Resources , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Infection Control , Male , Mobile Health Units , Organizational Objectives , Personnel Selection , Program Development , Program Evaluation
15.
J Public Health Dent ; 55(1): 34-6, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7776290

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Information about the oral health status of the homeless is limited. The purpose of this study is to characterize the dental caries status among users of a dental treatment and referral program at homeless shelters in Boston, MA. METHODS: Persons attending the program during a one-year period were assessed for evidence of dental caries experience by a single examiner. DMFT counts were abstracted from patient records. RESULTS: The population examined (n = 73) was 66 percent male with a mean age of 36 years. The racial composition was 51 percent African-American, 34 percent Caucasian, and 14 percent Hispanic. The 70 dentate people examined had a mean DFT of 11.1 (SD = 6.1). The mean percent of DFT that was DT per person was 55.7 percent. Untreated caries was detected in 91.4 percent of those examined. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show evidence of previous dental services utilization by these homeless individuals, but demonstrate a high need for preventive and restorative dental therapy.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/epidemiology , Ill-Housed Persons , Adult , Black People , Boston/epidemiology , DMF Index , Dental Restoration, Permanent/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New England/epidemiology , Tooth Loss/epidemiology , White People
16.
Spec Care Dentist ; 14(3): 123-7, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7871473

ABSTRACT

The aging of the United States population and the contribution of tooth loss to oral health make it important to describe tooth loss among the elderly in this country. Data from the National Survey of Oral Health in US Employed Adults and Seniors: 1985-1986, conducted by the National Institute of Dental Research, were analyzed to examine the prevalence and demographic correlates of tooth loss among the elderly. Results show that there were important differences in tooth loss among subgroups of the elderly sample (overall n = 5,649 persons aged 65+ years attending senior centers). The oldest seniors and those with the least education or income were the most likely to be edentulous. The oldest dentulous seniors, blacks, those with the least education or income, and those who lived in New England or the Northeast had the fewest number of teeth present. These findings suggest that efforts to reduce tooth loss among the elderly should target those with the least education and income.


Subject(s)
Mouth, Edentulous/epidemiology , Tooth Loss/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Sectional Studies , Demography , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Income , Linear Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prevalence , Residence Characteristics , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
17.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 20(6): 313-21, 1992 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1464224

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this analysis is to compare three different statistical models for predicting children likely to be at risk of developing dental caries over a 3-yr period. Data are based on 4117 children who participated in the University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study, a longitudinal study conducted in the Aiken, South Carolina, and Portland, Maine areas. The three models differed with respect to either the types of variables included or the definition of disease outcome. The two "Prediction" models included both risk factor variables thought to cause dental caries and indicator variables that are associated with dental caries, but are not thought to be causal for the disease. The "Etiologic" model included only etiologic factors as variables. A dichotomous outcome measure--none or any 3-yr increment, was used in the "Any Risk Etiologic model" and the "Any Risk Prediction Model". Another outcome, based on a gradient measure of disease, was used in the "High Risk Prediction Model". The variables that are significant in these models vary across grades and sites, but are more consistent among the Etiologic model than the Predictor models. However, among the three sets of models, the Any Risk Prediction Models have the highest sensitivity and positive predictive values, whereas the High Risk Prediction Models have the highest specificity and negative predictive values. Considerations in determining model preference are discussed.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/epidemiology , Models, Statistical , Child , Cohort Studies , DMF Index , Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Dental Caries/etiology , Dental Caries Susceptibility , Dental Plaque/epidemiology , Education , Fluorides/therapeutic use , Forecasting , Humans , Lactobacillus/isolation & purification , Logistic Models , Maine/epidemiology , North Carolina , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , South Carolina/epidemiology , Toothbrushing/statistics & numerical data , Universities
18.
J Public Health Dent ; 52(2): 64-8, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1564693

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of nursing caries has been found to be high in populations of Native American children, unlike other US population groups. Comparisons among studies are difficult because a variety of operational definitions of the syndrome have been used. This study had two goals. First, a retrospective dental record audit was conducted for a Native American population attending Head Start in 1977-78, to compare the prevalence rates of nursing caries obtained by using different nursing caries classification schemes. Second, we studied the relationship of prior nursing caries to current high caries level determined by a clinical exam in the same children approximately ten years later (N = 88). As expected, different classification schemes yielded different prevalence rates. Classification of nursing caries by buccal or lingual caries in the maxillary incisors found 45 percent of the children with the disorder, vs 61 percent if measured by three or more carious maxillary incisors, or 76 percent if two or more carious maxillary incisors. Nursing caries in these Head Start children, defined by caries on the buccal or lingual surfaces of the maxillary incisors, showed no increased risk of greater than or equal to 5 DMFT at age 15. The Head Start children classified as having nursing caries by two or more, or three or more, decayed maxillary anterior teeth had relative risks (RR) of 1.6 (95% Cl 1.1, 2.4) and 1.4 (95% Cl 1.0, 1.9) for high caries (DMFT greater than or equal to 5) ten years later, whereas the RR for children with a dmft greater than or equal to 5 was 2.4 (95% Cl 1.4, 4.3).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Bottle Feeding/statistics & numerical data , DMF Index , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Indians, North American , Tooth, Deciduous , Adolescent , Arizona/epidemiology , Bottle Feeding/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Dental Caries/etiology , Dental Restoration, Permanent/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Factors
20.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 17(5): 237-9, 1989 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2791512

ABSTRACT

On the basis of extensive clinical experience, a classification scheme for nursing-bottle syndrome (NBS) has been empirically constructed to reflect the progression and severity of the disease. Patients who do not have NBS are assigned a score of zero. Patients with NBS are given a score of 1 if they have caries on the facial or lingual surface of at least one of the primary maxillary incisors and optionally the primary maxillary first molars, a 2 if the buccal surface of one or both of the primary mandibular first molars are also involved, or a 3 if specific multiple surfaces are involved. The feeding pattern classification is as follows: 0 = non abusive, 1 = mildly, 2 = moderately, and 3 = severely abusive. The scoring depends upon the number of feeding times/day, the frequency with which the bottle or breast feeding is given during the might, and the duration of the feeding pattern (in months). Eighty-six cases were reviewed for classification. A chi-square test of a two-way contingency table showed a strong and significant relationship between disease severity and degree of feeding abuse. The findings support the validity of the classification schemes, illustrate the general pattern of NBS progression, and indicate that disease severity is a function of specific combinations of factors.


Subject(s)
Bottle Feeding/adverse effects , Dental Caries/etiology , Severity of Illness Index , Chi-Square Distribution , Child, Preschool , Feeding Behavior , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Kuwait , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...