Clinical indicators for diabetic eyecare delivered by optometrists in Australia: a Delphi study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Valid and updated clinical indicators can serve as important tools in assessing and improving eyecare delivery. BACKGROUND: Indicators for diabetic eyecare in Australia were previously developed from guidelines published before 2013 and then used to assess the appropriateness of care delivery through a nationwide patient record card audit (the iCareTrack study). To reflect emerging evidence and contemporary practice, this study aimed to update clinical indicators for optometric care for people with type 2 diabetes in Australia. METHODS: Forty-five candidate indicators, including existing iCareTrack and new indicators derived from nine high-quality evidence-based guidelines, were generated. A two-round modified Delphi process where expert panel members rated the impact, acceptability, and feasibility of the indicators on a 9-point scale and voted for inclusion or exclusion of the candidate indicators was used. Consensus on inclusion was reached when the median scores for impact, acceptability, and feasibility were ≥7 and >75% of experts voted for inclusion. RESULTS: Thirty-two clinical indicators with high acceptability, impact and feasibility ratings (all median scores: 9) were developed. The final indicators were related to history taking (n = 12), physical examination (n = 8), recall period (n = 5), referral (n = 5), and patient education/communication (n = 2). Most (14 of 15) iCareTrack indicators were retained either in the original format or with modifications. New indicators included documenting the type of diabetes, serum lipid level, pregnancy, systemic medications, nephropathy, Indigenous status, general practitioner details, pupil examination, intraocular pressure, optical coherence tomography, diabetic retinopathy grading, recall period for high-risk diabetic patients without retinopathy, referral of high-risk proliferative retinopathy, communication with the general practitioner, and patient education. CONCLUSION: A set of 32 updated diabetic eyecare clinical indicators was developed based on contemporary evidence and expert consensus. These updated indicators inform the development of programs to assess and enhance the eyecare delivery for people with diabetes in Australia.

Visualisation of peripheral retinal degenerations and anomalies with ocular imaging.

PURPOSE: Certain peripheral retinal degenerations pose a significant risk to vision and require prompt detection and management. Other historically "benign" peripheral lesions are being recognised as clinically significant due to their associations with ocular and systemic disorders. Assessment and documentation of these entities however can be difficult due to challenges in visualisation of the peripheral retina. This review addresses this by providing a series of clinical examples of these entities visualised with a variety of ocular imaging technologies. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Embase, Medline, and Google Scholar. We identified and analysed all papers referring to peripheral retinal degenerations and the peripheral retina, as well as reference lists of retrieved articles until August 2019. RESULTS: Using ocular imaging technologies including ultra-widefield imaging and peripheral optical coherence tomography, we comprehensively describe current evidence and knowledge of a number of peripheral retinal degenerations and anomalies including microcystoid, pavingstone, lattice, snail track, snowflake and reticular pigmentary degenerations, peripheral drusen, white without pressure, retinal holes and vitreoretinal tufts. A summary of these entities is also provided as a short and easily interpretable chairside guide to facilitate the translation of this evidence base into clinical practice. CONCLUSION: While ocular technologies are useful in visualising peripheral retinal degenerations, the current evidence is fragmented throughout the literature and there is a paucity of information on imaging of "benign" peripheral lesions. This review facilitates a multimodal imaging approach to evaluating peripheral lesions.

Ocular ischaemia: signs, symptoms, and clinical considerations for primary eye care practitioners.

Ischaemic stroke is a major disease burden as well as a leading cause of death. Early signs of ischaemic stroke can manifest in the eye, placing primary eyecare practitioners in an important position to identify patients at risk of ischaemic stroke and initiate suitable referral pathways. The vascular supply to the brain is reviewed with reference to vision including the various retinal signs and ocular symptoms associated with transient ischaemic attacks and ischaemic stroke. Using a range of clinical cases, the diverse clinical presentations of retinal embolic events, as well as other forms of vascular occlusion, are highlighted and the underlying pathophysiology is discussed. A succinct scheme for the assessment and management of ischaemic events for primary eye care practitioners is provided.

Evaluation of the initial implementation of a nationwide diabetic retinopathy screening programme in primary care: a multimethod study.

OBJECTIVES: The Australian Government funded a nationwide diabetic retinopathy screening programme to improve visual outcomes for people with diabetes. This study examined the benefits and barriers of the programme, image interpretation pathways and assessed the characteristics of people who had their fundus photos graded by a telereading service which was available as a part of the programme. DESIGN: Multimethod: survey and retrospective review of referral forms. SETTING: Twenty-two primary healthcare facilities from urban, regional, rural and remote areas of Australia, and one telereading service operated by a referral-only eye clinic in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven primary healthcare workers out of 110 contacted completed a survey, and 145 patient referrals were reviewed. RESULTS: Manifest qualitative content analysis showed that primary healthcare workers reported that the benefits of the screening programme included improved patient outcomes and increased awareness and knowledge of diabetic retinopathy. Barriers related to staffing issues and limited referral pathways. Image grading was performed by a variety of primary healthcare workers, with one responder indicating the utilisation of a diabetic retinopathy reading service. Of the people with fundus photos graded by the reading service, 26.2% were reported to have diabetes. Overall, 12.3% of eyes were diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy. Photo quality was rated as excellent in 46.2% of photos. Referral to an optometrist for diabetic retinopathy was recommended in 4.1% of cases, and to an ophthalmologist in 6.9% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide diabetic retinopathy screening programme was perceived to increase access to diabetic retinopathy screening in regional, rural and remote areas of Australia. The telereading service has diagnosed diabetic retinopathy and other ocular pathologies in images it has received. Key barriers, such as access to ophthalmologists and optometrists, must be overcome to improve visual outcomes.

An evidence-based approach to the routine use of optical coherence tomography.

Optical coherence tomography is an imaging technology that has revolutionised the detection, assessment and management of ocular disease. It is now a mainstream technology in clinical practice and is performed by non-specialised personnel in some settings. This article provides a clinical perspective on the implications of that movement and describes best practice using multimodal imaging and an evidence-based approach. Practical, illustrative guides on the interpretation of optical coherence tomography are provided for three major diseases of the ocular fundus, in which optical coherence tomography is often crucial to management: age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. Topics discussed include: cross-sectional and longitudinal signs in ocular disease, so-called 'red-green' disease whereby clinicians rely on machine/statistical comparisons for diagnosis in managing treatment-naïve patients, and the utility of optical coherence tomography angiography and machine learning.

Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations with Self-tonometry in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects: A Clinical Trial.

SIGNIFICANCE: This article shows that self-tonometry can provide robust measures of diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) and also detect changes to IOP in response to treatment within a short period of monitoring. These advances in IOP monitoring may contribute to improved management of glaucoma patients and suspects. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the utility of rebound self-tonometry performed over several weeks for detecting diurnal IOP fluctuations in glaucoma patients and suspects and also initial response to topical treatment in glaucoma patients. METHODS: Forty patients were recruited following glaucoma-specific examination. Subsequent to successful training with the iCare HOME tonometer, patients were instructed to measure IOP, in a sitting position, four times a day over 4 to 6 weeks. Date, time, laterality, and IOP downloaded from the tonometer and clinical examination data, including applanation IOP and corneal thickness, were analyzed. A user satisfaction survey was also administered at study completion. t Test and analysis of variance were used to compare groups and IOP across days. Pearson correlation was used to compare measurements to Goldmann applanation tonometry and IOP measurements from the first day/s to the overall mean IOP. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (18 suspects and 9 glaucoma patients) completed data collection. Patients self-measured IOP on 118 (±29) occasions for 40 (±7.4) days. Two dominant patterns of fluctuation were revealed: peak IOP upon awakening (n = 11) and at midday (n = 13). Diurnal IOP measured in the first 7 days showed strong correlation to diurnal IOP across the entire study period (r = 0.82, P < .0001). Within 24 hours of treatment commencement (latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution), IOP reduced from 23.9 (±5.2) to 16.1 (±2.6) mmHg. Overall, patients rated the instrument as easy to use, although difficulties with correct alignment were expressed. CONCLUSIONS: Rebound self-tonometry demonstrated utility for measuring diurnal IOP fluctuations in most patients, hence enhancing management of patient with or at risk of developing glaucoma.

Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of stereoscopic nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging to detect ocular pathologic features other than diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) compared with dilated retinal examination by retinal specialist ophthalmologists. DESIGN: Clinic-based comparative instrument study and retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty Joslin Diabetes Center outpatients (560 eyes) with type 1 or type 2 DM. METHODS: Nonsimultaneous stereoscopic nonmydriatic digital retinal images (640 x 480 pixels) of three 45 degrees retinal fields were acquired and graded for clinical level of DR and other ocular pathologic features by certified readers according to Joslin Vision Network (JVN) protocol. Retrospective chart review compared findings from JVN digital images with findings from dilated retinal examination by retinal specialists performed within an average of 39.6 days of digital imaging. An independent senior retinal specialist adjudicated disagreements by review of 7 standard field 35-mm Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol fundus photographs and JVN images. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection of non-DR ocular pathologic features by digital imaging as compared with clinical examination. RESULTS: Nonmydriatic digital evaluation identified at least 1 non-DR ocular finding in 40.7% of patients (114/280). Non-diabetes mellitus ocular pathologic features identified by digital images, clinical examination, or both included cataract (n = 100); age-related maculopathy (n = 52); suspicion of glaucoma (n = 18); choroidal lesions (n = 18); evidence of systemic disorder (e.g., hypertension or renal disease; n = 15); epiretinal membrane (n = 11); chorioretinal atrophy, scar, or both (n = 6); retinal emboli (n = 3); retinitis pigmentosa (n = 1); and asteroid hyalosis (n = 1). Agreement of nonmydriatic imaging with clinical examination for presence and absence of these findings was 95.4%, 91.3%, 98.2%, 98.6%, 98.2%, 99.6%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Kappa values for all non-DR lesions demonstrated near perfect agreement (kappa> or =0.80) except for age-related maculopathy (kappa = 0.71) and choroidal lesions (kappa = 0.73), where agreement was substantial. Overall, only 55 eyes (9.8%) were ungradable for level of DR and 85 eyes (15.2%) were ungradable for macular edema. CONCLUSIONS: Joslin Vision Network nonmydriatic digital imaging demonstrated excellent agreement with dilated ophthalmic examination by retinal specialists in the detection of ocular disease other than DR, suggesting a potential role for this technology in evaluating non-DR disorders and highlighting the extent of findings other than retinopathy in patients with diabetes.

Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the Joslin Vision Network (JVN) for follow-up annual retinal examination for level of diabetic retinopathy (DR). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with no or mild nonproliferative DR (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] level < or = 35) and no diabetic macular edema (DME) at dilated retinal examination 11 or more months earlier were imaged. Patients then had dilated retinal examination and color 35-mm seven standard field stereoscopic photography (ETDRS photographs) and completed a satisfaction survey. Level of DR determined from JVN images, clinical examination, and ETDRS photographs was compared. RESULTS: Two (1.9%) eyes had JVN images ungradable for level of DR. In the 102 gradable eyes (98.1%), JVN diagnosis exactly matched clinical examination for level of DR in 82 eyes (77.9%) and was within one level of DR in all eyes (100%). Three eyes (2.9%) had JVN images ungradable for DME; one of these eyes had DME by clinical examination. JVN diagnosis matched clinical examination for DME in all eyes (101) gradable by JVN. Fifty patients (96.1%) reported JVN imaging improved their understanding of eye disease, 100% were satisfied with JVN, and forty-eight (92.3%) would consider replacing dilated examination by their eye doctor with JVN imaging. CONCLUSIONS: JVN digital imaging closely matched clinical examination for level of DR and DME, would have resulted in no patients receiving less stringent follow-up, and was well accepted by patients. JVN digital imaging may be a suitable alternative for annual dilated retinal examination for determining level of DR or DME and appropriate follow-up comprehensive ophthalmic examination.

A telemedicine program for diabetic retinopathy in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center--the Joslin Vision Network Eye Health Care Model.

PURPOSE: To extend access to diabetic eye care and characterize the extent of diabetic retinopathy {DR) and other ocular findings using the Joslin Vision Network (JVN). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. METHODS: Outpatients at the Togus VA Medical Center with diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, or impaired glucose tolerance underwent JVN protocol imaging. Images were transmitted to the Joslin Diabetes Center for grading and recommended treatment plan. RESULTS: The study included 1,219 patients (2,437 eyes); 1,536 eyes (63.0%) had no (DR), 389 (16.0%) had mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR), 105 (4.3%) moderate NPDR, 35 (1.4%) severe NPDR, 20 (0.8%) very severe NPDR, and 21 (0.9%) had proliferative DR (PDR). Regarding diabetic macular edema (DME), 1,907 eyes (78.3%) had no DME, 34 (1.4%) had early DME, and 16 (0.7%) had clinically significant macular edema (CSME). Of all patients, 354 (29.0%) had either no DR or mild NPDR in both eyes, no evidence of DME, and no significant nondiabetic findings; 679 (55.7%) had no DR in either eye, and 229 (18.8%) had mild NPDR in the more severe eye. Of the 908 patients (74.5%) with either no DR or mild NPDR in the more severe eye, 533 (58.7%) had at least one nondiabetic ocular finding necessitating referral. Finally, 320 eyes (13.1%) were ungradable for both DR and DME and 160 (6.6%) were ungradable for DME alone. CONCLUSION: In a non-ophthalmic setting, JVN identifies the severity of DR and nondiabetic ocular conditions, permitting appropriate triage for eye care.

Use of Joslin Vision Network digital-video nonmydriatic retinal imaging to assess diabetic retinopathy in a clinical program.

PURPOSE: To incorporate a nonmydriatic, digital-video retinal imaging system into a Diabetes Outpatient Intensive Treatment Program and to evaluate the system's ability to assess diabetic retinopathy (DR), determine follow-up, and appropriately refer to retinal specialist ophthalmologists. METHODS: Fundus images were obtained according to Joslin Vision Network (JVN) protocol and evaluated by certified JVN readers. Patients with significant retinal disease underwent evaluation by retinal specialists. RESULTS: A total of 268 (51.0%) of 525 imaged patients had comprehensive eye examination by a retinal specialist owing to referable JVN-assessed clinical level of DR, nondiabetic ocular disease, ungradeable images, last eye examination >/=12 months prior, or patient request for examination. JVN diagnosis of a clinical level of DR agreed exactly with clinical findings in 388 eyes (72.5%) or within one level in 478 eyes (89.3%). JVN referral based on most severe diagnosis in either eye matched retinal specialist-recommended follow-up in 248/268 of patients (92.5%). A total of 136/525 (25.9%) of JVN patients had nondiabetic ocular abnormalities requiring referral. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended follow-up from JVN imaging compared favorably to clinical examination by a retinal specialist. Nondiabetic ocular pathology was identified. JVN assessment of DR level compares favorably to clinical practice, potentially improving access to eye care and enhancing diabetes management.