Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of four instrumentation systems in curved root canals.

AIM: To compare the shaping ability of four instrumentation systems in curved molar root canals, using computerized microtomography (micro-CT). METHODOLOGY: Forty mesial roots of mandibular molars were submitted first to radiographic examination to determine their curvature and then to a micro-CT scan to analyse other initial morphological characteristics. The specimens were distributed into four experimental groups, according to the endodontic instrumentation system used (n = 10): Group R, Reciproc; Group PTN, ProTaper Next; Group WOG, WaveOne Gold; Group PDL, ProDesign Logic. After root canal instrumentation, the specimens were submitted to a second micro-CT scan, and the pre- and postoperative data were examined to evaluate the following parameters: volume of dentine removed (DR), increase in root canal volume (VI), untouched root canal surface area (UA), volume of accumulated hard tissue debris (AD) and structure model index (SMI). The data observed for these parameters after instrumentation were analysed using generalized linear models. R software was used for the analyses, and the level of significance adopted was 5%. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the instrumentation systems regarding the DR, VI, UA and AD parameters (P > 0.05). PTN and WOG systems were associated with greater increases in SMI than the PDL system (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The four systems evaluated were similar regarding the parameters analysed, with the exception of the SMI, with the rate of variation of this parameter being greater after using the PTN and WOG systems than after using the PDL system. These results indicate that the four systems perform similarly in terms of their shaping ability, but that the PTN and WOG systems produced more rounded preparations than the PDL system.

A comparison of mesial molar root canal preparations using two engine-driven instruments and the balanced-force technique.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two engine-driven, nickel-titanium instrument systems with hand files in the final shape of slight and moderately curved canals. A total of 72 mesial roots of extracted human mandibular molars were divided into three groups: ProFile .04 taper, Pow-R rotary systems, and Flex-R hand-filing technique. The roots were mounted and cross-sectioned at two different horizontal levels using a modified Bramante technique. Pre- and postinstrumented cross-sectional roots were imaged, recorded, and computer analyzed. Results showed that, at the middle third, in almost all groups, there was a tendency of cutting more toward the mesial side with only one exception: Pow-R cut more to the distal side (danger zone) (p < 0.02). At the apical third, Flex-R (p < 0.03) and ProFile (0.001) transported to the mesial side (danger zone) when the curvature increased. When the three techniques were compared analyzing each side and considering the two groups of curvature, at the middle third in the moderately curved-canal group, Flex-R cut statistically more than Pow-R toward the lingual side. The other comparisons showed no statistically significant difference. When the techniques were compared in relation with the degree of curvature, in the apical third, ProFile .04 cut statistically more toward the mesial side in the moderately curved canal group than in the slightly curved canal group. The other comparisons showed no statistically significant difference. Canal preparation time was shorter with hand instrumentation (p < .05) in a few instances.

A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of remaining gutta-percha/scaler on the walls of root canals when two engine-driven instruments (Quantec and ProFile) and two hand instruments (K-file and Hedström file) were used to remove these materials. The amount of apically extruded debris and the time required for treatment were also recorded. METHODOLOGY: One hundred extracted mandibular premolars were prepared using a modified step-back, flare technique and obturated with the lateral condensation technique. After repreparation with the test instruments, the specimens were cut transversally at the cervical, middle and apical thirds with steel discs and the three sections were split longitudinally. The amount of residual debris on the canal walls in each section was examined using a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: In all groups the cervical and middle thirds showed no debris. In the apical third, obturating material was observed in some specimens. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for incidence of debris, although the Hedström group showed a greater number of samples with remaining gutta-percha/sealer. When analysing dirty specimens only, there was a statistically significant difference between the four groups (P < 0.01) with the Hedström group having significantly less length of canal wall with remaining obturation material than the Quantec group. There was no significant difference amongst the groups for weight of extruded debris. However, there was a significant difference amongst the groups for mean treatment time with the Hedström file group requiring significantly less time than the Quantec group (P < 0.001); no significant differences were found between the other groups. Six instruments fractured in the Quantec group, four in the ProFile group, two in the Hedström group and two in the K-type group. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that overall, all instruments may leave filling material inside the root canal. During retreatment there is a risk of instrument breakage, especially rotary instruments.